The Impact of Child Care Subsidies on Mothers’ Education Outcomes
The federal child care subsidy program reduces child care costs for eligible low-income families to facilitate parental employment and educational attainment. Using national data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), this study is the first to ask whether subsidies induce an increase in maternal education level over time, and if so, whether this increase is steeper for mothers who use subsidies to increase their education when their children are younger. After matching subsidy recipients with subsidy-eligible non-recipients on a range of background variables, we assess whether mothers increase their education levels in response to entry into the subsidy program at two different points in a child’s early years: first when children are 2 years old and then when children are in preschool. Results suggest that subsidy receipt promotes mothers’ educational attainment, with the largest impacts for mothers who receive subsidies when their children are younger (2 years old vs preschool-age) and for subgroups of mothers who have low baseline levels of education (high school or below) and who are not initially enrolled in school.
KeywordsChild care subsidies Maternal education Low-income
We are grateful for feedback received on earlier versions of this manuscript from Drs. Christ Herbst, Rebecca Ryan, and William Gormley, and conference participants at the Association for Public Policy and Management (APPAM) 2017 Fall Research Conference the Society for Research in Educational Effectiveness (SREE) Spring 2018 Conference, and the 2018 National Research Conference on Early Childhood (NRCEC). None of the above bear any responsibility for the contents.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
The study does not analyze primary data collected by the authors. All procedures performed by the authors and NCES are in accordance with ethical standards.
Because the study relies on nationally representative secondary data informed consent is not applicable. The authors followed all protocols and procedures in procuring and accessing the data. See https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/licenses.asp.
- Adams, G. C., Spaulding, S., & Heller, C. (2015). Bridging the gap: Exploring the intersection of workforce development and child care. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital revisited. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed., pp. 15–28). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Blau, D. M. (2001). The Child care problem: An economic analysis. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theory (5th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Chevalier, A., & Feinstein, L. (2006). Sheepskin or Prozac: The causal effect of education on mental health. IZA Discussion Paper, 2231.Google Scholar
- Child Care Aware of America. (2017). Parents and the high cost of child care. Arlington, VA: Child Care Aware of America. Retrieved from http://usa.childcareaware.org/advocacy-public-policy/resources/research/costofcare.
- Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Income effects across the life span: Integration and interpretation. In G. J. Duncan & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 596–610). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G. J., Huston, A. C., & Weisner, T. S. (2007). Higher ground: New hope for the working poor and their children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., Kalil, A., & Ziol-Guest, K. (2012). The importance of early childhood poverty. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 87–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23261304.
- Feinstein, L., Sabates, R., Anderson, T. M., Sorhaindo, A., & Hammond, C. (2006). What are the effects of education on health? In: Proceedings of the Copenhagen symposium: Measuring the effects of education on health and civic engagement (pp. 171–354). Paris, France.Google Scholar
- Friedlander, D., & Burtless, G. (1996). Five years after: The long-term effects of welfare-to-work programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Gault, B., Noll, E., & Reichlin, L. (2017). The Family-friendly campus imperative: Supporting success among community college students with children. Washington, DC: Association of Community College Trustees (ACCT).Google Scholar
- Gennetian, L. A., Magnuson, K., & Morris, P. A. (2008). From statistical associations to causation: What developmentalists can learn from instrumental variables techniques coupled with experimental data. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.1241.Google Scholar
- Gueron, J. M., & Pauly, E. (1991). From welfare to work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ha, Y., Joshi, P., Hardy, E., & Giapponi, K. (2014). The impact of eligibility reassessment process on the stability of child care subsidy receipt and child care arrangement. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis & Management Conference, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, G., Freedman, S., Genetian, L., Michalopoulos, C., Walter, J., Adams-Ciardullo, D., Mcgroder, S., Zaslow, M., … & Ricchetti, B. (2001). How effective are different welfare-to-work approaches? Five-year adult and child impacts for eleven programs. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
- Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
- Henly, J. R., Sandstrom, H., Claessens, A., Pilarz, A. R., Gelatt, J., Kim, J., et al. (2015). Determinants of subsidy stability and child care continuity. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Herbst, C. M. (2013). Universal child care, maternal employment, and children’s long-run outcomes: Evidence from the U.S. Lanham Act of 1940 (No. 7846). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2374627.
- Hoff-Ginsberg, E., & Tardif, T. (1995). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4, pp. 161–187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Jencks, C., Bartlett, S., Corcoran, M., Crouse, J., Eaglesfield, D., Jackson, G., et al. (1979). Who gets ahead. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Johnson, A. D., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2011). Who uses child care subsidies? Comparing recipients to eligible non-recipients on family background characteristics and child care preferences. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.014.Google Scholar
- Kruvelis, M., Reichlin Cruse, L., & Gault, B. (2017). Single mothers in college: Growing enrollment, financial challenges, and the benefits of attainment. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Leadbeater, B. J. (1996). School outcomes for minority-group adolescent mothers at 28 to 36 months postpartum: a longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6(4), 629–648.Google Scholar
- Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2016). Education pays, 2016: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society (Trends in Higher Education Series). College Board Advocacy & Policy Center.Google Scholar
- Magnuson, K. (2003). The effect of increases in welfare mothers’ education on their young children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion Paper no. 1274–03.Google Scholar
- Magnuson, K., Sexton, H. R., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Huston, A. C. (2009). Increases in maternal education and young children’s language skills. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 319–350. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23096260.
- Minton, S., Blatt, L., Tran, V., Stevens, K., & Giannarelli, L. (2017). The CCDF policies database book of tables: Key cross-state variations in CCDF policies as of October 1, 2016. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Moore, Q., & Schmidt, L. (2007). Do maternal investments in human capital affect children’s cognitive development? Unpublished manuscript, Williams College, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
- Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., & Levy, F. (1995). The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination (No. w5076). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Najarian, M., Snow, K., Lennon, J., Kinsey, S., & Mulligan, G. (2010). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), preschool-kindergarten 2007 psychometric report. Washington, DC: US Dept of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute for Education Sciences.Google Scholar
- Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K. G. (2009). How large are returns to schooling? Hint: Money isn’t everything (No. w15339). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Rogers, I., & Emmett, P. (2003). The effect of maternal smoking status, educational level and age on food and nutrient intakes in preschool children: Results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57(7), 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601619.Google Scholar
- Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. The Annals of Statistics, 6(1), 34–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2958688.
- Schochet, O. & Johnson, A. D. (2018). Associations between low-income mothers’ educational attainment and children’s early cognitive, socio-emotional, and health outcomes. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy and Management Fall Research Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Schulman, K., & Blank, H. (2017). Persistent gaps: State child care assistance policies. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.Google Scholar
- Small, M. L. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sommer, T. E., Chase-Lansdale, P. L., Brooks-Gunn, J., Gardner, M., Rauner, D. M., & Freel, K. (2012). Early childhood education centers and mothers’ postsecondary attainment: A new conceptual framework for a dual-generation education intervention. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–40.Google Scholar
- Spasojevic, J. (2003). Effects of education on adult health in Sweden: Results from a natural experiment (Ph.D. dissertation). New York: City University of New York Graduate Center.Google Scholar
- Tekin, E. (2014). Childcare subsidy policy: What it can and cannot accomplish. IZA World of Labor.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care. (2016a). FY 2015 Preliminary Data Table 1: Average monthly adjusted number of families and children served. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care. (2016b). FY 2015 Preliminary Data Table 10: Reasons for receiving care, average monthly percentage of families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care. (2017). Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Fiscal year 2015 state spending from all appropriation years. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.Google Scholar
- Waldfogel, J. (2006). What children need. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar