Advertisement

Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 55–105 | Cite as

Tonal (non-)transfer in Kunming Reduplication

  • Hui-shan LinEmail author
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss tonal reduplication in Kunming, which has received little attention in the formal linguistics literature. Based on first hand data, I show that tonal reduplication in Kunming is interesting in two respects. First, a Base tone is not always transferred to the RED (reduplicant); while a Hr (high register) Base tone (i.e., yinping 44, shangsheng 53) is transferred to the RED, the RED corresponding to a Lr (low register) Base tone (i.e., yangping 31, qusheng 11) surfaces with a non-correspondent high tone. I propose that the non-corresponding high tone comes from a floating tone that accompanies reduplication and is only realized on the RED corresponding to Lr Base tones, but not to Hr Base tones, because Hr Base tones are prominent and more easily preserved on the RED. Second, as far as yinping tone sandhi is concerned, though it applies normally on the Base and outside the BR complex, on the RED it unexpectedly underapplies when the RED carries a yinping tone copied from the Base. I propose that tone sandhi underapplies only on a copied yinping tone, and not elsewhere, because only underapplication of yinping tone sandhi in this case can help improve BR Identity.

Keywords

Kunming reduplication Tonal (non-)transfer Underapplication of tone sandhi Optimality Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my Kunming consultants, Liang-Zhu Huang 黃良珠, Yao-Hua Li 李耀華, Ju, Kong孔菊, and Xiao-Mei Wu 武笑梅, for their help with the language data. This paper could not appear without their help. Some ideas proposed here were presented to audiences at the 20th Annual International Conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences at Bunkyo Gakuin University, Japan, in 2018. I would like to thank the audiences there for their comments. I am also grateful to the three anonymous reviewers and the editors whose detailed and valuable comments have helped improve the content of this paper tremendously. All possible errors are my own responsibility. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan, with Project Number MOST 105-2410-H-003-096-.

References

  1. Alderete, John. 1999. Morphologically governed accent in optimality theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachussets, Amherst.Google Scholar
  2. Alderete, John. 2001. Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18: 201–253.Google Scholar
  3. Alderete, John, Jill Beckman, Laura Benua, Amalia Gnanadesikan, John J. McCarthy, and Suzanne Urbanczyk. 1999. Reduplication with fixed segmentism. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 327–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Variation, change and phonological theory, ed. Frans Hinskens, Roeland VanHout, and W. Leo Wetzels, 35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anttila, Arto. 2000. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. ROA#425. Rutgers Optimality Archive. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/425-1000/roa-425-anttila-2.pdf. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/425-1000/roa-425-anttila-2.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.
  6. Bao, Zhiming. 1999. On the nature of tone. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barry, J.G., P.J. Blamey, L.F.A. Martin, K.Y.S. Lee, T. Tang, Y.M. Yuen, et al. 2002. Tone discrimination in Cantonese-speaking children using a cochlear implant. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bickmore, Lee. 1995. Tone and stress in Lamba. Phonology 12: 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carleton, Troi, and Scott Myers. 1994. On tonal transfer. ROA 16. Rutgers Optimality Archive. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/16-0594/roa-16-carleton-2.rtf. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/16-0594/roa-16- carleton-2.rtf. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.
  10. Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930. A system of tone letters. La Maître Phonétique 45: 24–27.Google Scholar
  11. Chao, Y.R. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, Matthew. 2000. Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng, Robert L. 1973. Some notes on tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics 100: 5–25.Google Scholar
  14. Chiang, Min-Hua. 1998. Aspects of the phonology of Tongshi Hakka language. MA thesis, National Taiwan University.Google Scholar
  15. De Lacy, Paul. 1999. Tone and prominence. ROA#333. Rutgers Optimality Archive. http://roa.rutgers. edu/files/333-0799/333-0799-LACY-0-0.doc. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.
  16. De Lacy, Paul. 2002a. The interaction of tone and stress in optimality theory. Phonology 19 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Lacy, Paul. 2002b. The formal expression of markedness. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  18. Downing, Laura J. 2005. The emergence of the marked: Tone in some African reduplicative systems. In Studies on reduplication, ed. Bernhard Hurch, 89–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Feng, Guanjun. 2003. Lexical category specific constraints: Mandarin verb versus adjective reduplication. USC working papers in linguistics, 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. Goldsmith, John. 1987. Tone and accent, and getting the two together. In Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 88–104. CA: University of Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Gui, Ming Chao. 2000. Kunming Chinese. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
  22. Gui, Ming Chao. 2001. Yunnanese and Kunming Chinese: A study of the language communities, the phonological systems, and the phonological developments. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
  23. Hyman, Larry M., and Kenneth VanBik. 2004. Output problems in Hakha Lai—Or: What’s (not) Chinese about directional tone sandhi? Language and Linguistics 5 (4): 821–861.Google Scholar
  24. Inkelas, Sharon. 1998. The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study from dominance. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, ed. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 121–155. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1999. The phonological lexicon. In The handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. N. Tsujimura, 62–100. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Jiang-King, Ping. 1999. Sonority constraints on tonal distributions across Chinese dialects. In Proceedings of the 17th West Coast conference on formal linguistics, 332–46. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Li, Mingxing. 2004. Neutral tones in disyllabic sequences across Chinese dialects: An OT account. MA thesis, Tianjin University.Google Scholar
  31. Li, Zhiqiang. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of tone mapping in a constraint-based approach. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  32. Lin, Hui-shan. 2011. Special tonal alternations in Dongshi Hakka reduplication. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 9 (2): 1–60.Google Scholar
  33. Lin, Hui-shan. 2015. Chengdu reduplication: An OT analysis. Language and Linguistics 16 (6): 843–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin, Hui-shan. Forthcoming. The interaction of tone and prominence in Kunming. To appear in Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 45(1) (May 2019).Google Scholar
  35. Lu, Kailian. 1988. Kunming fangyan ciyu guankui [A glimpse of words in Kunming]. Yunnan Minzu Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) [Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University (Social Sciences Edition)] 2: 78–86.Google Scholar
  36. Lu, Kailian. 1990. Kunming fangyan zhi [Kunming dialect]. Yuxi Shifan XueYuan Xuebao [Journal of Yuxi Teachers’ College] 2 (3): 74–225.Google Scholar
  37. Mao, Yuling. 1997. Kunming hwa yindang [Recordings of Kunming]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press].Google Scholar
  38. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1993. Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Report no. RuCCS-TR-3. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
  39. McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in optimality theory, ed. Jill Beckman, Laura Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 249–384. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  40. Meredith, Scott. 1990. Issues in the phonology of prominence. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  41. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-based morphology and phonology: With special attention to Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  42. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1998. Cyclic and noncyclic phonological effects in a declarative grammar. In Yearbook of morphology 1997, ed. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 179–218. Amsterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1999. Sign-based morphology: A declarative theory of phonology–morphology interleaving. In The derivational residue in phonological optimality theory, ed. Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp, 247–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  44. Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Inkelas, Sharon. 2002. Reconsidering bracket erasure. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, ed. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 115–146. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-Franc, ois (1989). On coronal transparency. Phonology 6 (2): 317–348.Google Scholar
  46. Packard, Jerome L. 1998. A lexical phonology of Mandarin Chinese. In New approaches to Chinese word formation morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese, ed. Jerome L. Packard, 311–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pater, Joe. 2000. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17: 237–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pinson, Thomas, and Jacqueline Pinson. 2008. An introduction to Kunming Hua. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01383557/document. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01383557/document. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.
  49. Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1986. Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2004. A note on tonal markedness in Yoruba. Phonology 21: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Qu, Yanfeng. 1995. Adjective reduplications in Fuzhou: A morpho-phonological analysis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Selkirk, E.O. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In Papers in optimality theory, ed. J. Beckman, L.W. Dickey, and S. Urvanczyk, 439–470. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  54. Spaelti, Philip. 1997. Dimensions of variation in multi-pattern reduplication. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  55. Struijke, Caro. 2002. Existential faithfulness: A study of reduplicative TETU, feature movement, and dissimilation. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Ting, Pang-hsin. 1982. Some aspects of tonal development in Chinese dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 53: 629–644.Google Scholar
  57. Ting, Pang-hsin 1989. Hanyu shengdiao de yanbian [Diachronic change in Chinese tones]. In Proceedings of the Second International Sinology Conference, 395–408. Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  58. Wolf, Matthew. 2007. For an autosegmental theory of mutation. In University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 32: Papers in optimality theory III, ed. Leah Bateman, Michael O’Keefe, Ehren Reilly, and Adam Werle, 315–404. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
  59. Yip, Moira. 1980. The tonal phonology of Chinese. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  60. Yip, Moira. 2001. The complex interaction of tone and prominence. In Proceedings of NELS 31, 531–545. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Google Scholar
  61. Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang, Jie, and Yuwen Lai. 2007. Two aspects of productivity in Taiwanese double reduplication. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the international association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-15) and 19th annual North American conference on Chinese linguistics (NACCL-19), New York, May 25–27.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, Jie, and Yuwen Lai. 2008. Phonological knowledge beyond the lexicon in Taiwanese double reduplication. In Interfaces in Chinese phonology: Festschrift in honor of Matthew Chen on his 70th birthday, ed. Yuchau E. Hsiao, Hui-chuan Hsu, Lian-Hee Wee, and Dah-an Ho, 183–222. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, Ning. 1987. Kunming fangyan de chongdieshi [Reduplication patterns in Kunming dialect]. Fangyan 26–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations