Advertisement

On the ordering of elements in ideophonic echo-words versus prosaic dvandva compounds, with special reference to Korean and Japanese

  • Nahyun KwonEmail author
  • Keiko Masuda
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Building on Childs’s (Pragmat Soc 5(3):341–354, 2014) proposal that skewed phonotactic distributions provide a legitimate resource for expressiveness in ideophones, often described as iconic words, this study examines whether there are differences in element ordering between ideophonic echo-words and prosaic dvandva compounds, with special reference to Korean and Japanese. Measured against Cooper and Ross’s (in: Papers from the parasession on functionalism, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp 63–111, 1975) claimed-to-be-universal phonological constraints for the ordering of conjoined elements pertaining to element-initial consonants and vowels, the study reveals that both Korean and Japanese data comply with the constraints in general. However, in Korean, echo-words are significantly different from dvandva compounds in their compliance with the consonant constraint while they are not so with the vowel constraint. In reverse, echo-words and dvandva compounds in Japanese show a significant difference in their compliance with the vowel constraint but not with the consonant constraint. The findings provide quantitative evidence for the cross-linguistic applicability of the proposed phonological principles for element ordering and the language-specific phonotactic deviance of ideophones vis-à-vis the matrix language for the preferred ordering patterns.

Keywords

Ideophone Compound Korean Japanese Phonotactics Quantitative analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Phonetics Research Group (Akira Utsugi and Han Wang) and of the Onomatope Study Group (Marino Motoyama, Ming Chen, Mengying Jin, Yajing Feng) at Nagoya University for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper. N.K. acknowledges support from a postdoctoral fellowship for overseas researchers from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellows (#JP16F16729). K.M. gratefully acknowledges support from the Chuo University Leave Program for Special Research Projects.

References

  1. Akita, Kimi. 2008. Phonosemantic evidence for the mimetic stratum in the Japanese lexicon. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 34(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akita, Kimi. 2011. Toward a phonosemantic definition of iconic words. In Semblance and signification [Iconicity in language and literature 10], ed. Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer, and Christina Ljungberg, 3–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  3. Amanuma, Yasushi (ed.). 1974. Giongo/gitaigo jiten [A dictionary of mimetic words]. Tokyo: Tokyodo.Google Scholar
  4. Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco. 2010. Coordinating compounds. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(9): 863–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asano, Tsuruko (ed.). 1978. Giongo/gitaigo jiten [A dictionary of mimetic words]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
  6. Childs, Tucker G. 2014. Constraints on violating constraints: How languages reconcile the twin dicta of ‘Be different’ and ‘Be recognizably language’. Pragmatics and Society 5(3): 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, William E., and John. R. Ross. 1975. World order. In Papers from the parasession on functionalism, ed. Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy J. Vance, 63–111. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  8. Dienhart, John M. 1999. Stress in reduplicative compounds: Mish-mash or hocus-pocus? American Speech 74(1): 3–37.Google Scholar
  9. Diffloth, Gerard. 1994. I: big, a: small. In Sound symbolism, ed. Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala, 76–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. Ezra Pound among the Mawu: Ideophones and iconicity in Siwu. In Semblance and signification [Iconicity in language and literature 10], ed. Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer, and Christina Ljungberg, 39–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dingemanse, Mark, Will Schuerman, Eva Reinisch, Sylvia Tufvesson, and Holger Mitterer. 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92(2): e117–e133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emeneau, M.B. 1938. An echo-word motif in Dravidian folk-tales. Journal of the American Oriental Society 58(4): 553–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emeneau, M.B. 1969. Onomatopoetics in the Indian linguistic area. Language 45(2): 274–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foley, James. 1972. Rule precursors and phonological change by meta-rule. In Linguistic change and generative theory, ed. Robert P. Stockwell and Ronald K. S. Macaulay, 96–100. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Garrigues, Stephen. 1995. Mimetic parallels in Korean and Japanese. Studies in Language 19(2): 359–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamano, Shoko. 1998. The sound symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
  17. Hamano, Shoko. 2014. Nihongo no onomatope [Onomatopeia in Japanese: Sound symbolism and structure]. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
  18. Hayata, Teruhiro. 1977. Tsuigo-no on’inkaiso [On phonological hierarchies for binomials]. Bungaku Kenkyu 74: 123–152.Google Scholar
  19. Hida, Yoshifumi, and Hideko Asada. 2002. Gendai giongo gitaigo yōhō jiten [A usage dictionary of modern mimetic words]. Tokyo: Tokyodo.Google Scholar
  20. Hooper, Joan B. 1976. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jun, Jongho. 1994. Metrical weight consistency in Korean partial reduplication. Phonology 11(1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jung, Dong Hwan. 1991. Kwuke hapsengeuy uymikwankye yenkwu [A study of semantic relations of compound words in Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Konkuk University.Google Scholar
  23. Kakehi, Hisao, Ikuhiro Tamori, and Lawrence Schourup. 1996. Dictionary of iconic expressions in Japanese. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  24. Kasuya, Hideki, Hisayoshi Suzuki, and Ken’ichi Kido. 1968. Nenrei, seibetsu-ni-yoru nihongo go-boin-no picchi shuuhasuu-to horumanto shuuhasuu-no henka [Changes in pitch and first three formant frequencies of five Japanese vowels with age and sex of speakers]. Journal of Acoustic Society of Japan 24: 355–364.Google Scholar
  25. Kaist Raw Corpus. 1997. http://semanticweb.kaist.ac.kr/home/index.php/Corpus1. Accessed 10 May 2017.
  26. Kwon, Nahyun. 2015. The natural motivation of sound symbolism. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  27. Kwon, Nahyun. 2018. Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwon, Nahyun. to appear. “A theoretical extension of Ohala’s frequency code hypothesis.” In Sound symbolism in the history of thought, ed. Luca Nobile. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  29. Labrune, Laurence. 2006. Patterns of phonemic preferences in Japanese non-headed binary compounds: What waa-puro, are-kore and mecha-kucha have in common. Gengo Kenkyu 129: 3–41.Google Scholar
  30. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1982. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Larsen, Darrell, and Jeffrey Heinz. 2012. Neutral vowels in sound-symbolic vowel harmony in Korean. Phonology 29(3): 433–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, Jin-Seong. 1992. Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  33. Maduka, Omen N. 1988. Size and shape ideophones in Nembe: A phonosemantic analysis. Studies in African Linguistics 19(1): 93–113.Google Scholar
  34. Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8: 113–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. 2nd ed. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
  36. Murata, Tadao. 1984. Japanese sound hierarchy based on artificial onomatopoeia. Gengo Kenkyu 85: 68–90.Google Scholar
  37. Murata, Tadao. 1989. On English sound hierarchy—Based on the research in Britain —. Bulletin of the Kyushu Institute of Technology 37: 61–70.Google Scholar
  38. Murata, Tadao. 1990. On irreversible freezes. In Proceedings of the XIVth international congress of linguists, ed. Werner Bahner,‎ Joachim Schildt‎ and Dieter Viehweger, 2403–2406. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Nasu, Akio. 2015. The phonological lexicon and mimetic phonology. In Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology, ed. Haruo Kubozono, 253–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  40. Nihon kokugo daijiten, 2nd edition. 2000. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
  41. Oakeshott-Taylor, John. 1984. Phonetic factors in word order. Phonetica 41: 226–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound symbolism, ed. Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ono, Masahiro (ed.). 2007. Giongo/gitaigo 4500: Nihongo onomatope jiten [4500 mimetic words: A dictionary of Japanese onomatopoeia]. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
  44. Pinker, Steven, and David Birdsong. 1979. Speakers’ sensitivity to rules of frozen word order. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pordány, László. 1986. Irreversible binomials in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36(1/4): 151–179.Google Scholar
  46. Sapir, Edward. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Language sound structure, ed. Mark Aronoff and Richard Oehrle, 107–136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Shinohara, Kazuko, and Shigeto Kawahara. 2010. A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 36: 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sohn, H.-M. 1999. The Korean language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. The Korean Language Society. 1960. Sosacen [small dictionary]. Seoul: Jengumsa.Google Scholar
  52. The National Institute of the Korean Language. 2000. Compilation guidelines for the Great Standard Korean Dictionary II. http://www.korean.go.kr/front/reportData/reportDataView.do?report_seq=56 &mn_id=45. Accessed 26 Dec 2017.
  53. Ultan, Russell. 1978. Size-sound symbolism. In Universals of human language Vol. 2. Phonology, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 525–568. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wright, Saundra K., Jennifer Hay, and Tessa Bent. 2005. Ladies first? Phonology, frequency, and the naming conspiracy. Linguistics 43(3): 531–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamaguchi, Nakami (ed.). 2003. Kurashi no kotoba: Gion/gitaigo jiten [Language of life: A dictionary of mimetic words]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
  56. Yang, Byunggon. 1996. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 24(2): 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of HumanitiesJapan Society for the Promotion of Science/Nagoya UniversityNagoya-shiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of CommerceChuo UniversityHachioji-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations