Advertisement

Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

Complement selection and wh-scope in Japanese

  • Tomoyuki YoshidaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Lahiri (Questions and answers in embedded contexts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002) shows that the semantic categories <propositions> , <questions> , and <utterances> play a crucial role for complement selection in Spanish. This paper argues that Lahiri’s analysis can be directly applied to Japanese. In the course of discussion, the behavior of the sequence of complementizers (-no-ka-to) is examined in detail. It is suggested that we can analyze Japanese verbs and s-selection in a parallel way with Lahiri’s analysis of Spanish verbs if we extend Saito’s (J Jpn Linguist 26:85–100, 2010; Beyond functional sequence: the cartography of syntactic structures, vol 10, pp 255–274, 2015) analysis of the Japanese complementizer -to. It is also suggested that the behavior of verbs selecting commands as their complement can be captured if an additional semantic category <commands> is postulated. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the distinction between a question and a report of a question is crucial for wh-scope interpretation. In particular, a question CP ceases to constitute an island for wh-scope interpretation when it is embedded as part of a report. This observation suggests that an account of wh-island effects along the line of minimality effects cannot be employed to explain the interpretation of wh-phrases embedded in a report of a question.

Keywords

Complementizers Complement selection Question particles Semantic categories Wh-scope 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Shigeru Miyagawa, Atsushi Oho, Hiroaki Saito, Mike Kleindl and Satomi Nomura for comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. I would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their invaluable and helpful comments. Special thanks to Daniel Quintero for his help with Spanish data. All errors are mine.

References

  1. Anand, Pranav. 2006. De De Se. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Chiba, Shuji. 1979. On interrogative particles -kai and -dai. Journal of Tsuda College 11: 153–156.Google Scholar
  3. Chierchia, Gennaro, and Raymond Turner. 1988. Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 261–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Deguchi, Masanori, and Yoshihisa Kitagawa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 32, ed. Masako Hirotani, 75–90. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  6. Fujita, Yasuyuki. 2000. Kokugo inyoo koobun no kenkyuu [A study of the quotative structure in Japanese]. Osaka: Izumi Shoin.Google Scholar
  7. Fukui, Naoki. 1988. LF extraction of naze: Some theoretical implications. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 503–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heim, Irene. 1994. Interrogative semantics and Kartunen’s semantics for know. In The Israel Association for theoretical linguistics 1, ed. Rhonna Buchalla and Anitta Mittwoch, 128–144. Jerusalem: Akademon.Google Scholar
  9. Higginbotham, James. 1991. Belief and logical form. Mind and Language 6: 344–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2003. Intonation and interface conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Kaufmann, Magdalena. 2012. Interpreting imperatives. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kuno, Susumu. 1988. Blended quasi-direct discourse in Japanese. In Papers from the second international workshop on Japanese syntax, ed. William Poser, 75–102. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Lahiri, Utpal. 2002. Questions and answers in embedded contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Larson, Richard, and Paul Ludlow. 1993. Interpreted logical forms. Synthese 95: 305–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lasnik, Howard, and Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper-government. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 235–289.Google Scholar
  18. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1998. On islands. Ms, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ochi, Masao. 1997. Move or attract? In The proceedings of the sixteenth West Coast conference on formal linguistics, eds. Emily Curtis, James Lyle, and Gabriel Webster, 319–333. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Oshima, David Y., and Shin-ichiro Sano. 2012. On the characteristics of Japanese reported discourse: A study with special reference to elliptic quotation. In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, ed. Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid van Alphen, 145–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Plann, Susan. 1982. Indirect questions in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 297–312.Google Scholar
  23. Postal, Paul. 1974. On certain ambiguities. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 367–424.Google Scholar
  24. Rivero, María-Luisa. 1978. Topicalization and wh movement in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 513–517.Google Scholar
  25. Rivero, María-Luisa. 1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 363–393.Google Scholar
  26. Rivero, María-Luisa. 1994. On indirect questions, commands, and Spanish quotative que. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 547–554.Google Scholar
  27. Rizzi, Luizi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saito, Mamoru. 2010. On the nature of the complementizer to. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 26: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saito, Mamoru. 2015. Cartography and selection: Case studies in Japanese. In Beyond functional sequence: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 10, ed. Ur Shlonsky, 255–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Saito, Mamoru, and Tomoko Haraguchi. 2012. Deriving the cartography of the Japanese right periphery: The case of sentence-final discourse particles. Iberia 4: 104–123.Google Scholar
  31. Shimoyama, Junko. 2006. Indeterminate phrase quantification in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 14: 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Suñer, Margarita. 1993. About indirect questions and semi-questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 45–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takahashi, Daiko. 1993. Movement of wh-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11: 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tanaka, Hidekazu. 1999. LF wh-island and the minimal scope principle. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17: 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomason, Richmond. 1980. A model theory for propositional attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uchibori, Asako. 1997. Opacity and subjunctive complements in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean linguistics 6, ed. Ho-min Sohn and John Haig, 339–414. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Wh-in situ, subjacency, and chain formation. MIT occasional papers in linguistics 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working papers in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  38. Watanabe, Akira. 2001. Wh-in situ langauges. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 203–225. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamakoshi, Kyoko. 1997. Doubly filled COPM in Spanish and the cooccurrence of a question particle and a complementizer in Japanese. Ms, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  40. Yoshida, Tomoyuki. 1999. LF subjacency effects revisited. In Papers on morphology and syntax, circle two, ed. Vivian Lin, Cornelia Krause, Benjamin Bruening, and Karlos Arregi, 1–34. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  41. Zwicky, Arnold. 1971. In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 223–233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and LinguisticsInternational Christian UniversityMitakaJapan

Personalised recommendations