Membrane potential resonance in non-oscillatory neurons interacts with synaptic connectivity to produce network oscillations
Several neuron types have been shown to exhibit (subthreshold) membrane potential resonance (MPR), defined as the occurrence of a peak in their voltage amplitude response to oscillatory input currents at a preferred (resonant) frequency. MPR has been investigated both experimentally and theoretically. However, whether MPR is simply an epiphenomenon or it plays a functional role for the generation of neuronal network oscillations and how the latent time scales present in individual, non-oscillatory cells affect the properties of the oscillatory networks in which they are embedded are open questions. We address these issues by investigating a minimal network model consisting of (i) a non-oscillatory linear resonator (band-pass filter) with 2D dynamics, (ii) a passive cell (low-pass filter) with 1D linear dynamics, and (iii) nonlinear graded synaptic connections (excitatory or inhibitory) with instantaneous dynamics. We demonstrate that (i) the network oscillations crucially depend on the presence of MPR in the resonator, (ii) they are amplified by the network connectivity, (iii) they develop relaxation oscillations for high enough levels of mutual inhibition/excitation, and (iv) the network frequency monotonically depends on the resonators resonant frequency. We explain these phenomena using a reduced adapted version of the classical phase-plane analysis that helps uncovering the type of effective network nonlinearities that contribute to the generation of network oscillations. We extend our results to networks having cells with 2D dynamics. Our results have direct implications for network models of firing rate type and other biological oscillatory networks (e.g, biochemical, genetic).
KeywordsPreferred frequency response Latent time scales Inhibitory networks Neuronal filters
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation grant DMS-1608077 (HGR) and the Universidad Nacional del Sur grant PGI 24/L096 (AB). The authors thank Eran Stark for useful comments and discussions. HGR is grateful to the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at NYU and the Department of Mathematics at Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina.
- Beer, R. (1995). On the dynamics of small continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 471–511.Google Scholar
- Burden, R.L., & Faires, J.D. (1980). Numerical analysis. Boston: PWS Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- D’angelo, E., Nieus, T., Maffei, A., Armano, S., Rossi, P., Taglietti, V., Fontana, A., Naldi, G. (2001). Theta-frequency bursting and resonance in cerebellar granule cells: Experimental evidence and modeling of a slow K+ - dependent mechanism. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dayan, P., & Abbott, L.F. (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gastrein, P., Campanac, E., Gasselin, C., Cudmore, R.H., Bialowas, A., Carlier, E., Fronzaroli-Molinieres, L., Ankri, N., Debanne, D. (2011). The role of hyperpolarization-activated cationic current in spike-time precision and intrinsic resonance in cortical neurons in vitro. The Journal of Physiology, 589, 3753–3773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Remme, W.H., Donato, R., Mikiel-Hunter, J., Ballestero, J.A., Foster, S., Rinzel, J., McAlpine, D. (2014). Subthreshold resonance properties contribute to the efficient coding of auditory spatial cues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E2339–E2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G., Pervouchine, D., Gillies, M.J., Acker, C.D., White, J.A., Buhl, E.H., Whittington, M.A., Kopell, N. (2005). Slow and fast inhibition and h-current interact to create a theta rhythm in a model of CA1 interneuron networks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G. (2014a). Frequency preference response to oscillatory inputs in two-dimensional neural models: a geometric approach to subthreshold amplitude and phase resonance. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 4, 11.Google Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G., & Nadim, F. (2014b). Frequency preference in two-dimensional neural models: a linear analysis of the interaction between resonant and amplifying currents. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 37, 9–28.Google Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G. (2017a). Resonance modulation, annihilation and generation of antiresonance and antiphasonance in 3d neuronal systems: interplay of resonant and amplifying currents with slow dynamics. J. Comp. Neurosci., 43, 35–63.Google Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G. (2017b). The shaping of intrinsic membrane potential oscillations: positive/negative feedback, ionic resonance/amplification, nonlinearities and time scales. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 42, 133–166.Google Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G. (2017c). Spiking resonances in models with the same slow resonant and fast amplifying currents but different subthreshold dynamic properties. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 43, 243–271.Google Scholar
- Rotstein, H.G., Ito, T., stark, E. (2017d). Inhibition based theta spiking resonance in a hippocampal network. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 615, 11.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, S.L., Dorsett, C.R., Iyengar, A.K., Frölich, F. (2016). Interaction of intrinsic and synaptic currents mediate network resonance driven by layer V pyramidal cells. Cereb. Cortex, page https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw242.