Parenting in Chinese Immigrant Families: A Critical Review of Consistent and Inconsistent Findings
- 19 Downloads
Due to the fast growing population of Chinese immigrants in the Western countries, parenting in Chinese immigrant families has gained increasing attention in research. This paper identifies the consistent and inconsistent findings among contemporary studies on the parenting in immigrant Chinese families from three aspects, including parental beliefs and values, parental expectations, and parenting practices.
This paper presents a critical review of 30 relevant empirical studies published during 2007–2017. These studies were searched systematically searched from four databases—A+ Education, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), ProQuest, and PsycINFO are to identify relevant articles.
Research inconsistency is shown in three places, including the inconsistency: (1) between the studies describing parenting in Chinese immigrant families as a collection of characteristics and the studies describing parenting as a changing process, (2) within the studies that define parenting in Chinese immigrant families as a collection of characteristics, and (3) within the studies that conceptualize parenting as a changing process.
The study finds that the different nature of data, research settings, and data collection methods are the main possible reasons for the inconsistent or even contradictory findings. Despite the research inconsistency, categorizing parenting into cultural groups and perceiving parenting as a collection of static characteristics are the two major limitations of these studies. To overcome these limitations, this paper argues for breaking stereotypes and investigating parenting as a dynamic process instead of a collection of static traits.
KeywordsImmigrant Chinese Parenting Cultural diversity Family education
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
- Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market. Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432.Google Scholar
- Cabrera, N. J., Fitzgerald, H. E., Bradley, R. H., & Roggman, L. (2014). The ecology of father–child relationships: an expanded model. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(4), 336–354.Google Scholar
- Chan, A. (2017). Transnational parenting practices of Chinese immigrant families in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
- *Chan, A., & Ritchie, J. (2016). Parents, participation, partnership: problematising New Zealand early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116660954
- Chua, A. (2011). Battle hymn of the tiger mother. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fleer, M. (2014). A digital turn: post-developmental methodologies for researching with young children. In M. Fleer & A. Ridgway (Eds), Visual methodologies and digital tools for researching with young children (pp. 3–11). Cham: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- *Fung, J. J., & Lau, A. S. (2009). Punitive discipline and child behavior problems in Chinese-American immigrant families: the moderating effects of indigenous child-rearing ideologies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(6), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409343749.Google Scholar
- Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 20(9), 1408–1416.Google Scholar
- Gibson, W. (2010). Qualitative research as a method of inquiry in education. In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 54–64). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- *Guo, K. (2012). Chinese immigrants in New Zealand early childhood settings: perspectives and experiences. Early Childhood Folio, 16(1), 5–9.Google Scholar
- Hartas, D. (2010). The epistemological context of quantitative and qualitative research. In D. Hartas. (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 33–53). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Havighurst, S., Wilson, K., Harley, A., Kehoe, C., Efron, D., & Prior, M. (2013). “Tuning into kids”: reducing young children’s behavior problems using an emotion coaching parenting program. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-012-0322-1.Google Scholar
- *Hunt, J. H., & Hu, B. Y. (2011). Theoretical factors affecting parental roles in children’s mathematical learning in American and Chinese-born mothers. School Community Journal, 21(2), 119–142.Google Scholar
- *Klein, A. (2008). From Mao to Memphis: Chinese immigrant fathers’ involvement with their children’s education. School Community Journal, 18(2), 91–118.Google Scholar
- Lee, M.-H. (2010). Confucian traditions in modern east Asia: their destinies and prospects. Oriens Extremus, 49(1), 237–247.Google Scholar
- Leung, L. C. (2014). Confucian welfare: a barrier to the gender mainstreaming of domestic violence policy in Hong Kong. In S. S. & P. G. (Eds), Gender and Welfare States in East Asia (pp. 114–136). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- *Liang, S. (2015). What strategies do Chinese immigrant parents use to send their children to high-performing public school districts? School Community Journal, 25(2), 135–152.Google Scholar
- Lu, X. (2016). Ideological contestation over parenting styles: Dr. Spock vs. Amy Chua. China Media Research, 12(1), 25.Google Scholar
- Ma, J. (2017b). A cultural-historical study of children’s role adjustment during the transition to school within a bi-cultural context. Australia: Monash University.Google Scholar
- *Poureslami, I., Nimmon, L., Ng, K., Cho, S., Foster, S., & Hertzman, C. (2013). Bridging immigrants and refugees with early childhood development services: partnership research in the development of an effective service model. Early Child Development and Care, 183(12), 1924–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.763252.Google Scholar
- Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd edn). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- *Sims, J., & Coley, R. L. (2015). Independent contributions of mothers’ and fathers’ language and literacy practices: associations with children’s kindergarten skills across linguistically diverse households. Early Education and Development, 27(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1091973.Google Scholar
- Veresov, N. (2010). Introducing cultural historical theory: main concepts and principles of genetic research methodology. Cultural-historical psychology, 2010(4), 83–90.Google Scholar
- Veresov, N. (2014). Method, methodology and methodological thinking. In M. Fleer & A. Ridgway (Eds), Visual methodologies and digital tools for researching with young children (pp. 215–228). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). Genesis of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: the history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 97–119). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The problem of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: the history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1–26). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
- *Wang, D. (2008). Family-school relations as social capital: Chinese parents in the United States. School Community Journal, 18(2), 119–146.Google Scholar
- *Wang, Q. (2013). Chinese socialization and emotion talk between mothers and children in native and immigrant Chinese families. Asian. American Journal of Psychology, 4(3), 185–192.Google Scholar
- *Yamamoto, Y., Li, J., & Liu, J. L. (2016). Does socioeconomic status matter for Chinese immigrants’ academic socialization? Family environment, parental engagement, and preschoolers’ outcomes. Research in. Human Development, 13(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1194706.Google Scholar