A Pilot Study of One-Session Treatment for Specific Phobias in Children with ASD Traits
- 4 Downloads
One-Session Treatment (OST), a three-hour treatment which includes psychoeducation, exposure, participant modeling, cognitive challenges, and positive reinforcement, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of childhood phobias. Several comorbid anxiety conditions such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder have been shown to have little or no negative effects on treatment outcomes for OST whereas others such as Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder have been shown to compromise treatment outcomes. This study sought to examine the initial efficacy of OST for children with a behavioral profile demonstrating specific traits of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). We undertook this exploratory study to determine the feasibility and potential efficacy of this brief treatment with these youth.
Two variations of the treatment were trialed. In the OST condition, the child alone received treatment with minimal parental involvement. In the Augmented OST condition, two clinicians were assigned to each family: one clinician worked with the child and the other with the parent. Families in both treatments returned for follow-up assessments one-week, 6-months, and 1-year later.
A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant reductions in phobia severity as well as increases in overall functioning for both forms of treatment.
These results suggest that OST may be an effective intervention for children with ASD traits who evince SPs. Future controlled studies will need to examine the efficacy of this brief intervention with carefully diagnosed youth with ASD as well as explore specific components that make it effective for these children.
KeywordsSpecific phobia Autism spectrum One-session treatment
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH59308; PI Thomas Ollendick); National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH074777; PI Thomas Ollendick).
AM: Proposed analyses for the data, collaborated on conducting analyses and writing of the paper. SRR: Collaborated on conducting analyses and writing the paper. TO: Collaborated on designing and conducting initial clinical trials from which the data came, and collaborated on the writing of the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The data presented in this study were approved by the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent/assent was obtained from all participants in the study. All participants provided both verbal and written consent/assent after having the contents of both these forms summarized out loud and being given the opportunity to ask questions.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
- Baio, J., Wiggins, L., Christensen, D. L., Maenner, M. J., Daniels, J., Warren, Z., & Durkin, M. S. (2018). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dadds, M. R., Rapee, R. M., & Barrett, P. M. (1994). Behavioral observation. In T. H. Ollendick, N. K. King, & W. Yule (Eds). International handbook of phobic and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 349–364). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hagopian, L. P., Lilly, M., & Davis, T. E. (2017). Behavioral treatments for anxiety in minimally verbal children with ASD. In Anxiety in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder (pp. 193–210). Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hersen, M., & Bellack, A. S. (Eds). (1976). Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook (Vol. 65). Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Lieb, R., Miché, M., Gloster, A. T., Beesdo-Baum, K., Meyer, A. H., & Wittchen, H. U. (2016). Impact of specific phobia on the risk of onset of mental disorders: a 10-year prospective-longitudinal community study of adolescents and young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 33(7), 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (2003). Autism diagnostic observation schedule: ADOS. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Ollendick, T. H., Halldorsdottir, T., Fraire, M. G., Austin, K. E., Noguchi, R. J., Lewis, K. M., & Whitmore, M. J. (2015). Specific phobias in youth: a randomized controlled trial comparing one-session treatment to a parent-augmented one-session treatment. Behavior Therapy, 46(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ollendick, T. H., Öst, L. G., Reuterskiöld, L., Costa, N., Cederlund, R., Sirbu, C., & Jarrett, M. A. (2009). One-session treatment of specific phobias in youth: a randomized clinical trial in the United States and Sweden. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. 29, 30.Google Scholar
- Rudy, B. M., & Davis III, T. E. (2012). Interventions for specific phobia in special populations. In Intensive one-session treatment of specific phobias (pp. 177–193). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Silverman, W. K., Albano, A. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Manual for the ADIS-IV-C/P. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar