Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Assessment of Parents’ Disciplinary Alternatives
- 43 Downloads
The majority of strategies designed to assess parental discipline practices typically focus on ineffective or adverse discipline options. When more comprehensive measures are utilized, parents are often expressly asked to report their use of nonphysical discipline options but such an approach signals to parents that they should report implementing such choices, thereby rendering it susceptible to social desirability.
Rather than cueing parents with possible discipline options, the Production of Discipline Alternatives (PDA) is a very brief parent-report coding scheme of the discipline options parents freely generate to an open-ended question after reading a short vignette. The current study investigated the inter-rater reliability and stability as well as concurrent and predictive validity from the coding of this brief qualitative prompt using three waves of longitudinal data collected from mothers and fathers (prenatally, child age 6 months, and child age 18 months).
Findings demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (between independent coders) and stability of discipline alternatives provided by parents across nearly two years. Concurrent and predictive validity were also observed; specifically, mothers and fathers who generated proportionally more physical discipline options were more likely to approve of physical discipline, to be inclined to punish perceived misbehavior, to prefer authoritarian parenting approaches, to evidence greater child abuse risk, and to report more frequent use of physical discipline.
The current findings imply the PDA may have research utility as well as potential value in screenings at primary and integrated care settings relevant for prevention and intervention efforts.
KeywordsDiscipline tactics Primary care screening Child abuse prevention Physical punishment Nonviolent discipline Corporal Punishment
We thank our participating families and participating Obstetrics/Gynecology clinics that facilitated recruitment. This research was supported by award number R15HD071431 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.
CR designed the procedure, analyzed the data, and led the writing of the paper; SMOW and MC jointly coded the data and contributed to writing the methods and results.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Alampay, L. P., Godwin, J., Lansford, J. E., Bombi, A. S., Bornstein, M. H., & Bacchini, D. (2017). Severity and justness do not moderate the relation between corporal punishment and negative child outcomes: a multicultural and longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bavolek, S. J., & Keene, R. G. (2001). Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2): Administration and development handbook. Park City: Family Development Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
- Eckenrode, J., Campa, M. I., Morris, P. A., Henderson, Jr, C. R., Bolger, K. E., Kitzman, H., & Olds, D. L. (2017). The prevention of child maltreatment through the Nurse Family Partnership Program: mediating effects in a long-term follow-up study. Child Maltreatment, 22, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holden, G. W., Coleman, S., & Schmidt, K. (1995). Why 3-year-old children get spanked: parent and child determinants as reported by college-educated mothers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 431–452.Google Scholar
- Howard, B. J. (1996). Advising parents on discipline: what works. Pediatrics, 98, 809–815.Google Scholar
- Kind, M. R. (2005). Parenting education in a public high school system. A primary prevention program. Journal of Psychohistory, 32, 344–362.Google Scholar
- Luster, T., & Youatt, J. (1989). The effects of pre-parenthood education on high school students. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
- Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual. 2nd edn. Webster: Psyctec.Google Scholar
- Plotkin, R. (1983). Cognitive mediation in disciplinary actions among mothers who have abused or neglected their children: Dispositional and environmental factors. University of Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
- Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice.. Upper Saddle River: Pearson & Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C. M., Silvia, P. J., & Gaskin, R. E. (2017). Predicting maternal and paternal parent-child aggression risk: Longitudinal multimethod investigation using Social Information Processing theory. Psychology of Violence. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000115.
- Scarr, S., Pinkerton, R., & Eisenberg, M. (1994). Parental discipline interview manual. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Zulauf, C. A., Sokolovsky, A. W., Grabell, A. S., & Olson, S. L. (2018). Early risk pathways to physical versus relational peer aggression: The interplay of externalizing behavior and corporal punishment varies by child sex. Aggressive Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21744.