Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 1182–1195 | Cite as

A Comparison of Hobbies and Organized Activities among Low Income Urban Adolescents

  • Davia B. SteinbergEmail author
  • Valerie A. Simon
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

Youths’ participation in organized activities has been repeatedly associated with better psychosocial adjustment. However, youth living in more disadvantaged contexts (e.g., lower-income, dangerous neighborhoods) have less access to organized activities. The current study aimed to compare hobbies and organized activities, in terms of their accessibility and associations with social functioning with peers, using a social ecological framework. We also examined the conditional effects of family and neighborhood disadvantage for the associations between activity engagement and peer functioning.

Methods

Participants were 91 predominantly African American, urban-dwelling middle school girls (Mage = 12.43) and their primary caregivers. Dyads completed separate interviews and questionnaires on activity engagement, family and neighborhood disadvantage, and social functioning with peers.

Results

Results suggest that hobbies are a distinct facet of activity engagement that might be more widely accessible than organized activities. Greater involvement in hobbies and organized activities showed unique associations with indices of better peer functioning. Moreover, some of these associations were stronger for youth living in more disadvantaged contexts.

Conclusions

This study advances the understanding of an important yet neglected topic within the adolescent development literature on activity research, namely differential access to opportunities among ethnic minority youth. Results suggest that hobby engagement is an important aspect of activity engagement with social benefits, especially for youth living in more disadvantaged contexts. Further investigation is warranted to understand the range of potential benefits of youths’ hobby involvement.

Keywords

Early adolescence Activity engagement Neighborhood disadvantage Low income Peer functioning. 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health to Valerie Simon (HD61230).

Author Contributions

D.B.S. collaborated with the design of the study, completed with the data analyses, and wrote the paper. V.A.S designed and executed the study, collaborated with the data analyses, writing, and editing of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study described received full IRB approval through Wayne State University and the sample was treated in compliance with APA ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aizer, A. (2004). Home alone: supervision after school and child behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1835–1848.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00022-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., Chango, J., & Szwedo, D. (2014). The adolescent relational dialectic and the peer roots of adult social functioning. Child Development, 85, 192–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA task force on socioeconomic status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, B. L., Eccles, J. S., & Stone, M. R. (2001). Whatever happened to the jock, the brain, and the princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 429–455.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558401165002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohnert, A. M., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohnert, A. M., Kane, P., & Garber, J. (2008). Organized activity participation and internalizing and externalizing symptoms: reciprocal relations during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 239–250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9195-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohnert, A. M., Richards, M., Kohl, K., & Randall, E. (2009). Relationships between discretionary time activities, emotional experiences, delinquency and depressive symptoms among urban African American adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 587–601.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9336-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohnert, A. M., Richards, M., Kolmodin, K. E., & Lakin, B. L. (2008). Young urban African American adolescents’ discretionary time activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 517–539.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00569.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brooks, R. (2003). Self-worth, resilience and hope: the search for islands of competence. http://www.cdl.org/articles/self-worth-resilience-and-hope-the-search-for-islands-of-competence/.
  11. Brooks, R. (2005). The search for islands of competence: a metaphor of hope and strength. http://www.drrobertbrooks.com/monthly_articles/0506.
  12. Brooks, B. A., Floyd, F., Robins, D. L., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59, 678–687.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (2008). The network of relationships invetory: Relationship qualities version. Unpublished measure, University of Texas at Dallas.  https://doi.org/10.13072/midss.387.
  14. Buhrmester, D., Furman, W., Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 991–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Busseri, M. A., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2009). Breadth and intensity: salient, separable, and developmentally significant dimensions of structured youth activity involvement. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 907–933.  https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X397017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cauce, A. M., Cruz, R., Corona, M., & Conger, R. (2011). The face of the future: risk and resilience in minority youth. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 57, 13–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7092-3_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coll, C. G., Crnic, K., Lamberty, G., Wasik, B. H., Jenkins, R., Garcia, H. V., & McAdoo, H. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coulton, C., & Irwin, M. (2009). Parental and community level correlates of participation in out-of-school activities among children living in low income neighborhoods. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 300–308. 1016/j.childyouth.2008.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Covay, E., & Carbonaro, W. (2010). After the bell: participation in extracurricular activities, classroom behavior, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 83, 20–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040709356565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Csıkszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Happiness and creativity: going with the flow. The Futurist, 31, 8–12.Google Scholar
  21. Darling, N. (2005). Participation in extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 493–505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-7266-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dekeyser, M., Raes, F., Leijssen, M., Leysen, S., & Dewulf, D. (2008). Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1235–1245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farb, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2012). Recent advances in research on school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Developmental Review, 32, 1–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: a framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review Public Health, 26, 399–419.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fredricks, J., & Eccles, J. (2006). Extracurricular involvement and adolescent adjustment: Impact of duration, number of activities, and breadth of participation. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 132–146.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads1003_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fredricks, J., & Eccles, J. (2008). Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: are there developmental benefits for African American and European American youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1029–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9309-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fredricks, J. A., & Simpkins, S. D. (2013). Organized out‐of‐school activities and peer relationships: theoretical perspectives and previous research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2013(140), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03599.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furman, W., Dunn, C., & Young, B. (2009). The role of peer and romantic relationships in adolescent affective development. In N. B. Allen & L. Sheeber (Eds.), Adolescent emotional development and the emergence of depressive disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ge, X., Natsuaki, M. N., & Conger, R. D. (2006). Trajectories of depressive symptoms and stressful life events among male and female adolescents in divorced and nondivorced families. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 253–273.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hafen, C. A., Laursen, B., & Delay, D. (2012). Transformations in friend relationships across the transition into adolescence. In B. Laursen & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Relationships pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood (pp. 69–89). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452240565.n4.Google Scholar
  34. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Klinker, C. D., Schipperijn, J., Christian, H., Kerr, J., Ersbøll, A. K., & Troelsen, J. (2014). Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children’s school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11, 8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-8.
  36. Larson, R., Richards, M., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents’ daily interactions with their families from ages 10–18: disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744–754.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laursen, B. & Collins, W. A. (Eds.) (2011). Relationship pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452240565.n4.Google Scholar
  38. Laursen, B., & Pursell, G. (2009). Conflict in peer relationships. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 267–286). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lin, T. H. (2010). A comparison of multiple imputation with EM algorithm and MCMC method for quality of life missing data. Quality & Quantity, 44, 227–287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9196-5.Google Scholar
  40. Lobel, A., Engels, R. C., Stone, L. L., Burk, W. J., & Granic, I. (2017). Video gaming and children’s psychosocial wellbeing: a longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 884–897.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0646-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Côté, S., Beers, M., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5, 113–118.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mahoney, J. L. (2000). School extracurricular activity participation as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. Child Development, 71, 502–516.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mahoney, J. L., Cairns, B. D., & Farmer, T. W. (2003). Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 409–418.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsh, H. W., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: the good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 464–511.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.4.051388703v7v7736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. Lessons from Research on Successful Children American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.205.Google Scholar
  46. Matheny, A. P., Wachs, T. D., Ludwig, J. L., & Phillips, K. (1995). Bringing order out of chaos: psychometric characteristics of the confusion, hubbub, and order scale. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 429–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(95)90028-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGee, R., Feehan, M., Williams, S., Partridge, F., Silva, P. A., & Kelly, J. (1990). DSM-III disorders in a large sample of adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 611–619.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199007000-00016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Trucker, C. J. (2001). Free-time activities in middle childhood: links with adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 72, 1764–1778.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meece, D., Pettit, G., Mize, J., & Hayes, M. (1998). What do young adolescents do when school let’s out? Discretionary time use and its relation to school adjustment. ERIC Reports. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/What+Do+Young+Adolescents+Do+When+School+Let%27s+Out%3f+Discretionary…-a0192423793.
  50. Mu, S. K., & Zhou, W. (2011). Handling missing data: expectation—maximization algorithm and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Advances in Psychological Science, 19, 1083–1090.  https://doi.org/10.17576/mjas-2017-2103-05.Google Scholar
  51. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1993). Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 561–570.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pedersen, S. (2005). Urban adolescents’ out-of-school activity profiles: associations with youth, family, and school transition characteristics. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 107–124.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Posner, J. K., & Vandell, D. L. (1999). After-school activities and the development of low-income urban children: a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 35, 868–879.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quane, J. M., & Rankin, B. (2006). Does it pay to participate? Neighborhood-based organizations and the social development of urban adolescents. Children & Youth Services Review, 28, 1229–1250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramey, H. L., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2012). Contexts of structured youth activities and positive youth development. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00219.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Randall, E. T., & Bohnert, A. M. (2009). Organized activity involvement, depressive symptoms, and social adjustment in adolescents: ethnicity and socioeconomic status as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1187–1198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9417-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Randall, E. T., & Bohnert, A. M. (2012). Understanding threshold effects of organized activity involvement in adolescents: sex and family income as moderators. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 107–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Randall, E. T., Bohnert, A. M., & Travers, L. V. (2015). Understanding affluent adolescent adjustment: the interplay of parental perfectionism, perceived parental pressure, and organized activity involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 41, 56–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richards, M. H., Larson, R., Miller, B. V., Luo, Z., Sims, B., Parrella, D. P., & McCauley, C. (2004). Risky and protective contexts and exposure to violence in urban African American young adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 138–148.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3301_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 258–276. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3090214.
  61. Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Baldwin, A., & Baldwin, C. (1993). Stability of intelligence from preschool to adolescence: the influence of social and family risk factors. Child Development, 64, 80–97.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02896.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, K. (1997). Who’s minding the kids? Washington, DC: Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  63. Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: a conceptual statement. Pacific Sociological Review, 25, 251–72.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1388726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th edn). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  65. Urban, J. B., Lewin-Bizan, S., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The role of neighborhood ecological assets and activity involvement in youth developmental outcomes: differential impacts of asset poor and asset rich neighborhoods. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 601–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2018). Federal Poverty Level (FPL). Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/federal-poverty-level-fpl/.
  67. Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., & Watts, T. W. (2015). Children’s organized activities. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 4; pp. 1–40). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Vander Stoep, A., McCauley, E., Flynn, C., & Stone, A. (2009). Thoughts of death and suicide in early adolescence. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 39, 599  https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2009.39.6.599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2011). Transformations in adolescent peer networks. In B. Laursen & W. A. Collins (eds.), Relationship pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood (pp. 135–154). New York: Sage. 10.4135/9781452240565.n7.Google Scholar
  70. Wu, N., Lester, P., Jiang, L., Weiss, R., Slocum, S. L., & Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (2005). Problematic substance use among adolescents in HIV-affected families. Center for Community Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Annual Meeting of the American. Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology & Merrill Palmer Skillman InstituteWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations