Do Attachment Styles and Family Functioning Predict Adolescents’ Problematic Internet Use? A Relative Weight Analysis
The increased use of Internet in the last decade has led to problematic behaviour that can affect people’s individual and social functioning, especially among younger individuals. This study aimed to explore the relation between problematic Internet use (PIU), attachment style, and perception of family functioning in adolescence.
Participants were 306 Italian adolescents (62.7% females and 37.3% males) aged from 15 to 18 years (M = 16.07, SD = 0.91). Participants completed the following measures: the Young’s Internet Addiction Test (Y-IAT), the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ), and the Family Assessment Device (FAD).
The results of regression and relative weight analyses showed that family functioning and attachment styles were important predictors of adolescent PIU. In particular, a greater perception of family members as being interested in and placing value on each other’s activities and concerns (i.e., affective involvement) and a greater perception that tasks were clearly and equitably assigned to family members (i.e., roles) were associated with less PIU. In contrast, a greater anxious-preoccupied attachment was associated with a greater risk of PIU.
In line with these results, it would be recommendable the development of family-focused prevention programs for all adolescents at risk of PIU before they develop a full Internet addiction. Further research on this topic is needed to develop a specific, autonomous, and comprehensive diagnostic process for PIU to avoid conceptual and treatment overlap between PIU and other kinds of addictive behaviors.
KeywordsProblematic internet use Addiction Attachment styles Family functioning Adolescents
We thank Diane Williams, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
M.C. designed and executed the study, assisted with the data analyses, and wrote the paper. D.B. and S.M. analyzed the data and collaborated in the writing of the manuscript. F.D. and C.C. collaborated in the design and writing of the study. A.G. collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. LUMSA University of Rome provided IRB approval for this study.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Atwood, R. M., Beckert, T. E., & Rhodes, M. R. (2017). Adolescent problematic digital behaviors associated with mobile devices. North American Journal of Psychology, 19, 659–684.Google Scholar
- Barni, D. (2015). Relative importance analysis for the study of the family: Accepting the challenge of correlated predictors. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22, 235–250.Google Scholar
- Bartholomew, K., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Methods of assessing adult attachment. Attachment theory and close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 25–45). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. 6th ed. (pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
- Campanella, M., Mucci, F., Baroni, S., Nardi, L., & Marazziti, D. (2015). Prevalence of internet addiction: A pilot study in a group of Italian high-school students. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 12, 90–93.Google Scholar
- Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 17–52). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
- Laghi, F., Schneider, B. H., Vitoroulis, I., Coplan, R. J., Baiocco, R., Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Hudek, N., Koszycki, D., Miller, S., & Flament, M. (2013). Knowing when not to use the Internet: Shyness and adolescents’ on-line and off-line interactions with friends. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, S., Kim, J. Y., & Cho, C. B. (2008). Prevalence of internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence, 43, 895–909.Google Scholar
- Schimmenti, A., Guglielmucci, F., Barbasio, C., & Granieri, A. (2012). Attachment disorganization and dissociation in virtual worlds: A study on problematic internet use among players of online role playing games. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9, 195–202.Google Scholar
- Sun, P., Johnson, C. A., Palmer, P., Arpawong, T. E., Unger, J. B., Xie, B., & Sussman, S. (2012). Concurrent and predictive relationships between compulsive internet use and substance use: Findings from vocational high school students in China and the USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar