Excessive Force and Students with Disabilities: Legal and Practice Considerations
Examine pertinent case law involving the use of “excessive force” with children and youth with disabilities. In addition, legal implications for school personnel, based on these rulings, will be discussed and alternatives to using force will be explored.
One-hundred thirty cases from the Special Ed Connection database were included for review and examined for the purpose of identifying patterns in special education litigation of “excessive force” spanning 1997 to May 2018.
The majority of the cases were heard in states covered by the 11th circuit (24 cases); autism was the most prevalent category involved (36 cases); the majority of cases were brought before the court for excessive force under the 14th Amendment (92 cases); and schools were the prevailing party for 60% of cases while a total of 92 cases were decided under the 14th Amendment.
Case law typically examined whether the force applied was proportionate to the incident at hand; presence of injury; and whether the force used served a pedagogical purpose or was arbitrarily punitive in nature. Means to reduce the use of force may include frameworks like PBIS and Ci3T, and the use of restorative practices, staff training in verbal de-escalation, and the use of explicit instruction to teach conflict resolution skills are highly recommended.
KeywordsExcessive force Public schools Discipline Litigation Prevention
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Avery v. City of Hoover et al. 65 IDELR 289 (N.D. AL. 2015).Google Scholar
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder among children aged 8 years—Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1–23. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/ss/ss6706a1.htm.
- Colvin, G., & Scott, T. M. (2015). Managing the cycle of acting out behavior in the classroom. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Diliberti, M., Jackson, M., & Kemp, J. (2017). Crime, violence, discipline, and safety in U.S. public schools: Findings from the school survey on crime and safety: 2015–16 (NCES 2017-122). Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- DOE v. State Of Hawaii Department Of Education, 334 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 2003).Google Scholar
- Kowalski, D. V et al. 810 F.3d 403 (6th Cir. 2016).Google Scholar
- Eason v. Clark County School District et al. 303 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2002).Google Scholar
- FindLaw. (2018). Use of physical force on students. Retrieved November 15, from students. http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/use-of-physical-force-onstudents.html.
- Ennis, R. P., Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L. & Dunlap, K. (in press). Mapping the literature base on the use of behavior-specific praise in PK-12 settings: strategies for increasing praise delivery and improving student outcomes. Behavioral Disorders.Google Scholar
- Evanovich, L. L., Martinez, S., Haynes, R. D., & Kern, L. (in press). Proactive circles: a practical guide to the implementation of a restorative practice. Preventing School Failure.Google Scholar
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004). FindLaw. (2018). Use of physical force on students. http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/use-of-physical-force-onstudents.html.
- Gottlieb v. Laurel Highlands School District, F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
- Gray, L., & Lewis, L. (2015). Public school safety and discipline: 2013–14 (NCES 2015- 51). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982).Google Scholar
- Hatfield v. O’Neill, 534 F. App’x 838 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
- Hayenga, v. Nampa School District NO. 131, 123 F. App’x 783 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
- J. A. v. Seminole County School Board. (2005). 105 LRP 58370. Middle District of Florida: U.S. District Court.Google Scholar
- Jackson on Behalf of Z. J. v. City of Middletown, No. 3: 11-CV-00725 (JAM), 2017 WL 2218304 (D. Conn. May 19, 2017).Google Scholar
- James, R., & Richards, C. K. (2011, Winter). School liability: Excessive force. School Safety, 12–15.Google Scholar
- Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., & Menzies, H. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Matheson, A. S., & Shriver, M. D. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 202–219.Google Scholar
- Ortega, O. H. v. Volusia County School Board & Biying H. U. 50 IDELR 255 (M. D. FL. 2008).Google Scholar
- Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009).Google Scholar
- Peterson v. Baker et al. 504 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
- Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001). State v. Williams, 521 S.W.3d 689 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).Google Scholar
- State of Missouri v. Charles Williams (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District June 27, 2017). 2017 USA FindLaw ED 104649.Google Scholar
- Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C. § 794.Google Scholar
- Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Algozzine, R., Barrett, S., Lewis, T., Anderson, C., Simonsen, B. (2010). School-wide positive behavior support: Implementers’ blueprint and self-assessment. Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
- Urbonya, K. R. (2010). Public school officials’ use of physical force as a fourth amendment seizure using physical force implicates a student’s constitutional right to personal security: protecting students from the constitutional chasm between the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The George Washington Law Review, 69, 1–55.Google Scholar
- U.S. v. Wicomico Public Schools (2017). Settlement agreement between the United States of America and Wicomico County Public Schools. https://www.justice.gov/crt/case-document/wicomico-county-public-school-district-settlement-agreement.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2018a). 39th Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education. (2018b). 2015–16 Civil Rights Data Collection: School climate and safety. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education. (2016). 2013–14 Civil Rights Data Collection. Retrieved October 21, 2018, from https://ocrdata.ed.gov.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services; and National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, L. M. (2011). Students’ freedom from excessive force by public school officials: a Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment right. Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 21, 35–85.Google Scholar
- Weiss, C. P. (1996). Curbing violence or teaching it: criminal immunity for teachers who inflict corporal punishment. Washington University Law Review, 74, 1251–1289.Google Scholar
- Wise v. Pea Ridge School District, 855 F.2d 560 (8th Cir. 1988).Google Scholar
- Young v. Mariscal, No. 3: 16-CV-00678-VPC, 2017 WL2540575 (D. Nev. 2017).Google Scholar