Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 3200–3217 | Cite as

Development and Validation of the Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale: Measuring Effective Parenting Strategies

  • Jessica J. L. KirkmanEmail author
  • Mark R. Dadds
  • David J. Hawes
Original Paper
  • 798 Downloads

Abstract

The current study aimed to develop and evaluate a measure of parenting knowledge, the Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale (KOPSS); specifically, to establish the scales internal reliability, ensure a clinically appropriate length, provide a community sample for future comparison, demonstrate adequate test–retest reliability and convergent validity, and to compare the scale to dysfunctional discipline styles. A total of n = 865 parents were involved in the development and evaluation of the scale. In Study 1, data was collected from n = 229 parents and Rasch analyses revealed seven items did not fit the measurement model. Study 2 involved a further sample of community families (n = 346) and revealed the scale could be further shortened to 16 items. Study 3 revealed the scale has good test–retest reliability over a one-week period (r = .88, p < .001). Study 4 demonstrated convergent validity through a comparison to the Knowledge of Effective Parenting Scale (r = .583, p = .009). Study 5 utilised a sample of community families (n = 190), revealing the scale was negatively correlated with hostile and lax discipline (r = −.29, p < .001; r = −.15, p < .05). Lastly, Study 6 showed scores on the KOPSS significantly improved following clinic-based and Internet-based Behavioural Parent Training. The KOPSS was found to be a valid and reliable measure of parenting knowledge of effective parenting strategies, which can be used to evaluate knowledge acquisition in parenting programs, and test the role of knowledge in behaviour change.

Keywords

Parenting knowledge Parenting competence Effective parenting Child behaviour 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Partnership Grant APP1056878 with Royal Far West 2013–2017).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Development and Validation of the Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale: Measuring Effective Parenting Strategies

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

J. J. L. K. declares that she has no conflict of interest. M. R. D. and D. J. H. own copyright and benefit financially from the sales of the clinic-based manualised parent training program referred to in study six.

References

  1. Arnold, D. S., O’Leary, S. G., Wolff, L. S., & Acker, M. M. (1993). The parenting scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5, 137–144.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brestan, E. V., & Eyberg, S. M. (1998). Effective psychosocial treatments of conduct-disordered children and adolescents: 29 years, 82 studies, and 5,272 kids. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 180–189.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2702_5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Comer, J. S., Chow, C., Chan, P. T., Cooper-Vince, C., & Wilson, L. A. S. (2013). Psychosocial treatment efficacy for disruptive behaviour problems in very young children: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(1), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dadds, M. R., & Hawes, D. (2006). Integrative family intervention for child conduct disorders. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eyberg, S. M., & Boggs, S. R. (1998). Parent-child interaction therapy: A psychosocial intervention for the treatment of young conduct-disordered children. In J. M. Briesmeister & C. S. Schaefer (Eds.), Handbook of parent training: Parents as co-therapists for children’s behavior problems. 2nd ed. (pp. 61–97). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 215–237.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701820117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fry, E. (1977). Fry’s readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21(3), 242–252.Google Scholar
  9. Gardener, F., Burton, J., & Klimes, I. (2006). Randomised controlled trial of a parenting intervention in the voluntary sector for reducing child conduct problems: Outcomes and mechanisms of change. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 1123–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01668.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glogower, F., & Sloop, E. W. (1976). Two strategies for group training of parents as effective behavior modifiers. Behavior Therapy, 7, 177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(76)80273-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, D. J., Warner-Rogers, J. E., & Hecht, D. B. (1998). Implementing and evaluating an individualized behavioral intervention program for maltreating families: Clinical and research issues. In J. R. Lutzker (Ed.), Handbook of child abuse research and treatment (pp. 133–158). New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2005). Oppositional and conduct problems. In J. Hudson & R. Rapee (Eds.), Current thinking on psychopathology and the family (pp. 73–91). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hautmann, C., Eichelberger, I., Hanisch, C., Pluck, J., Walter, D., & Dopfner, M. (2010). The severely impaired do profit most: Short-term and long-term predictors of therapeutic change for a parent management training under routine care conditions for children with externalizing problem behavior. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 419–430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-009-0072-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Holtrop, K., Parra-Cardona, J. R., & Forgatch, M. S. (2014). Examining the process of change in an evidence-based parent training intervention: A qualitative study grounded in the experiences of participants. Prevention Science, 15, 745–756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0401-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudson, A. M. (1982). Training parents of developmentally handicapped children: A component analysis. Behavior Therapy, 13, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., Read, J. P., Palfai, T. P., & Wood, M. D. (2004). Mapping the continuum of alcohol problems in college students: A Rasch model analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirkman, J. L., Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2016a). An open trial for an e-health treatment for child behavior disorders I: Social acceptability, engagement, and therapeutic process. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 1(4), 196–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2016.1230481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirkman, J. L., Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2016b). An open trial for an e-health treatment for child behavior disorders II—Outcomes and clinical implications. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 1(4), 213–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2016.1230482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamoureux, E. L., Pallant, J. F., Pesudovs, K., Hassell, J. B., & Keeffe, J. E. (2006). The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: An evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sceince, 47, 4732–4741.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, E. L., Wilsie, C. C., & Brestan-Knight, E. (2011). Using parent-child interaction therapy to develop a pre-parent education module. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1254–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.02.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leijten, P., Raaijmakers, M. A. J., de Castro, B. O., & Matthys, W. (2013). Does socioeconomic status matter? A meta-analysis on parent training effectiveness for disruptive child behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(3), 384–392.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.769169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundahl, B., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, C. (2006). A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 86–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. McLoughlin, C. S. (1985). Utility and efficacy of knowledge of behavioral principles as applied to children. Psychological Reports, 56, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon, R. J., Forehand, R. L., & Griest, D. L. (1981). Effects of knowledge of social learning principles on enhancing treatment outcome and generalization in a parent training program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 526–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Michelson, D., Davenport, C., Dretzke, J., Barlow, J., & Day, C. (2013). Do evidence-based interventions work when tested in the “real world” A systematic review and meta-analysis of parent management training for the treatment of child disruptive behaviour. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16, 18–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-013-0128-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Morawska, A., Sanders, M. R., & Winter, L. (2007). The Knowledge of Effective Parenting Scale. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: The School of Psychology, The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  27. O’Dell, S. L., Tarler-Benlolo, L., & Flynn, J. M. (1979). An instrument to measure knowledge of behavioral principles as applied to children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 10, 29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(79)90033-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pallant, J. F., Miller, R. L., & Tennant, A. (2006). Evaluation of the Edinburgh post natal depression scale using Rasch analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 6(28), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-6-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pallant, J. F., & Miller, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466506X96931.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rhoades, K. A., & O'Leary, S. G. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the parenting scale. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 137–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1537441070127415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanders, M. R. (2012). Development, evaluations, and multinational dissemination of the triple p-positive parenting program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 345–379.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanders, M. R., & James, J. E. (1983). The modification of parent behavior: A review of generalization and maintenance. Behavior Modification, 7, 3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455830071001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Schleider, J. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2015). Using Mechanical Turk to study family processes and youth mental health: A test of feasibility. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3235–3246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0126-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, R. M. (2000). Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2, 199–218.Google Scholar
  35. Spritzer, A., Webster-Stratton, C., & Hollinsworth, T. (1991). Coping with conduct-problem children: Parents gaining knowledge and control. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 413–427.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2004_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tennant, A., McKenna, S. P., & Hagell, P. (2004). Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value in Health, 7, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tiano, J. D., & McNeil, C. B. (2014). Mothers’ and fathers’ knowledge of behavioral principles as applied to children: Data from a normative sample. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Alphen, A., Halfens, R., Hasman, A., & Imbos, T. (1994). Likert or Rasch? Nothing is more applicable than good theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winter, L., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2012a). The effect of behavioral family intervention on knowledge of effective parenting strategies. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 881–890.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9548-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winter, L., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. (2012b). The knowledge of effective parenting scale (KEPS): A tool for public health approaches to universal parenting programs. Journal of Primary Prevention, 33, 85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-012-0268-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica J. L. Kirkman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark R. Dadds
    • 2
  • David J. Hawes
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyThe University of SydneyCamperdownAustralia

Personalised recommendations