Perspectives on Factors Impacting Youth’s Reentry into Residential Care: An Exploratory Study
Multiple placements in therapeutic residential care is expensive, and is associated with poor outcomes; thus, identifying barriers to successful reintegration into the home and community school settings is essential for developing appropriate post-discharge supports, and reducing societal costs. Participants were seven youth (four female; three White/Caucasian, one Black/African American, one Hispanic/Latino, two multi-racial) recently readmitted to a therapeutic residential care program and five of their primary caregivers (four female; four White/Caucasian, one Black/African American). Through semi-structured interviews with caregivers and youth, this exploratory study investigated (1) the perceptions of preparedness for the youth’s successful transition from therapeutic residential care to the home setting, (2) the post-discharge factors that contributed to the youth’s return to care, and (3) the lessons learned about the youth’s transition from therapeutic residential care to home. The results of this exploratory, qualitative study revealed rich information about youth and their caregivers’ perspectives about their experiences prior to returning to care, such as the importance of healthy relationships (family and peers), transition planning, and post-discharge supports at the individual, family, and school levels.
KeywordsTherapeutic residential care for youth Voices of caregivers and youth Multiple placements Aftercare Transition home
The development and preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education, through Grants R324B110001 and R324A120260 to the University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W.D.R.M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed.). (Vol 1, pp. 993–1028). Hoboken, NJ, US: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dregan, A., & Gulliford, M. C. (2012). Foster care, residential care and public care placement patterns are associated with adult life trajectories: Population-based cohort study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0458-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duppong Hurley, K., Trout, A., Chmelka, M. B., Burns, B. J., Epstein, M. H., Thompson, R. W., & Daly, D. L. (2009). The changing mental health needs of youth admitted to residential group home care: Comparing mental health status at admission in 1995 and 2004. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426608330791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenbaum, P. E., Dedrick, R. F., Friedman, R. M., Kutash, K., Brown, E. C., Lardieri, S. P., & Pugh, A. M. (1996). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669600400301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffith, A. K., Smith, G., Huefner, J. C., Epstein, M. H., Thompson, R., Singh, N. N., & Leslie, L. K. (2012). Youth at entry to residential treatment: Understanding psychotropic medication use. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2028–2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harder, A. T., Kalverboer, M. E., & Knorth, E. J. (2011). They have left the building: A review on aftercare services’ outcomes for adolescents following residential youth care. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 14, 86–104.Google Scholar
- James, S., Charlemagne, S. J., Gilman, A. B., Alemi, Q., Smith, R. L., Tharayil, P. R., & Freeman, K. (2010). Post discharge services and psychiatric rehospitalization among children and youth. Administration and policy in mental health and mental. Health Services Research, 37, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-009-0263-6.Google Scholar
- Larzelere, R. E., Daly, D. L., Davis, J. L., Chmelka, M. B., & Handwerk, M. L. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Girls and Boys Town’s family home program. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 130–149.Google Scholar
- Lee, B. R., Chmelka, M. B., & Thompson, R. (2010). Does what happen in group care stay in group care? The relationship between problem behaviour trajectories during care and post-placement functioning. Child & Family Social Work, 15, 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00669.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lyons, J. S., & McCulloch, J. R. (2006). Monitoring and managing outcomes in residential treatment: Practice-based evidence in search of evidence-based practice. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000190468.78200.4e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, T. D., Smith, T. R., Duppong Hurley, K., Epstein, M. H., Thompson, R. W., & Tonniges, T. F. (2013). Association between psychopathology and physical health problems among youth in residential treatment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426612450187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pecora, P. J., & English, D. J. (2016). Elements of effective practice for children and youth served by therapeutic residential care. Retrieved from: http://www.casey.org/residential-care.
- Preyde, M., Frensch, K., Cameron, G., White, S., Penny, R., & Lazure, K. (2011). Long-term outcomes of children and youth accessing residential or intensive home-based treatment: Three year follow up. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9442-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Psychiatric Residential Treatment Network of Services (2013). The truth about the costs of quality residential mental health treatment. Retrieved from http://pasadenavilla.com/2013/08/23/the-truth-about-the-costs-of-quality-residential-mental-health-treatment/.
- QSR International. (2012). NVivo qualitative data analysis Software. Victoria, Australia: Doncaster. Version 10.Google Scholar
- Scholte, R. H. & Aken, van, M. (2006). Peer relations in adolescence. In S. Jackson, L. Goossens (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent development (pp. 175–199). New York, NY: University Press.Google Scholar
- Trout, A. L., Hagaman, J. L., Chmelka, M. B., Gehringer, R., Epstein, M. H., & Reid, R. (2008). The academic, behavioral, and mental health status of children and youth at entry to residential care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 25, 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865710802533654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trout, A. L., Lambert, M. C., Epstein, M. H., Tyler, P., Thompson, R. W., Stewart, M., & Daly, D. L. (2013). Comparison of On the Way Home after care supports to traditional care following discharge from a residential setting: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Child Welfare, 92, 27–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trout, A. L., Lambert, M. C., Nelson, T. D., Epstein, M. H., & Thompson, R. W. (2015). Prevalence of physical health issues of youth with school identified disabilities in residential settings: A brief report. Disability and Health Journal, 8, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar