Emotion Regulation in Families of Children with Behavior Problems and Nonclinical Comparisons
The current study compared parents’ emotion regulation (ER) in clinical (those with a child with externalizing behavioral problems) and low-risk comparison families. Additionally, mediation models were explored with parent ER predicting child behavior problems through child ER. Participants were 60 families with children (71.7% boys; 73% Caucasian) ages 2 through 8 years (M = 4.62; SD = 1.69) from a rural population in the United States: 34 clinical families referred for parent training and 26 nonclinical families. A blocking design was used to balance the two groups on key demographic characteristics. Parents’ and children’s ER was assessed using parent-report surveys and structured behavioral observations. Analyses indicated higher rates of parental emotion dysregulation (specifically, more difficulty when upset with achieving goal-directed behaviors, p = .01, d = 0.67; controlling impulses, p = .01, d = 0.64; limited use of ER strategies, p = .02, d = 0.62; and more negative verbalizations to their child during the observed task, p < .01, d = 0.73) and child emotion dysregulation (specifically, more difficulty as reported by parents, p < .01, d = −2.42) in the clinical group. Mediational analyses indicated there were indirect paths from parental ER to children’s behavioral problems through child ER. Findings from this research suggest a need to measure and target ER in both parents and their children when working with families who are referred for treatment of child behavior problems.
KeywordsEmotion regulation Child behavior problems Externalizing disorders Parent–child relationships
The present manuscript is based off of the first author’s master’s thesis conducted at West Virginia University.
Author L.Q.: designed and executed the study, conducted the data analyses, wrote the paper, and edited the final manuscript. Author N.W.: collaborated with the design and study execution, aided in writing of the study, and edited the final paper. Author C.M.: designed the study, assisted with writing the paper, and edited the final manuscript. Author A.G.: assisted with running and interpreting the data analyses, writing the paper, and editing the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of West Virginia University’s research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-aged forms & profiles. Burlington, VA: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
- Calkins, S. D., & Hill, A. (2006). Caregiver influences on emerging emotion regulation: Biological and environmental transactions in early development. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 229–248). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dishion, T. J., French, D. C., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Manual of developmental psychopathology (pp. 421–471). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., & Morris, A. S. (2002). Children’s emotion-related regulation. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 189–229). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., Duke, M., & Boggs, S. R. (2005). Manual for the parent-child interaction coding system. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg child behavior inventory and Sutter-Eyberg behavior inventory- revised: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Macklem, G. L. (2008). Practitioner’s guide to emotion regulation in school-aged children. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Mazursky-Horowitz, H., Felton, J. W., MacPherson, L., Ehrlich, K. B., Cassidy, J., Lejuez, C. W., & Chronis-Tuscano, A. (2015). Maternal emotion regulation mediates the association between adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and parenting. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 121–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., & Capaldi, D. M. (1991). Antisocial parents: Unskilled and vulnerable. In P. A. Cowan (Ed.), Family transitions (pp. 195–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Richerson, L. A. (2008). Behavioral, cognitive, and affective predictors of child conduct problems in the context of parent-child interactions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68, 8410.Google Scholar
- Stegge, H., & Terwogt, M. M. (2007). Awareness and regulation of emotion in typical and atypical development. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 269–286). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. In N. A. Fox (Ed.), The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioral considerations (pp. 25–52). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Wallace, N. M., Quetsch, L. B., Robinson, C., Gentzler, A. L., & McNeil, C. B. (2015). Emotion regulation difficulties in caregivers and children: Transmission, influences, and implications for parent-training approaches. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research, volume 109 (pp. 27–46). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Walton, A., & Flouri, E. (2010). Contextual risk, maternal parenting and adolescent externalizing behavior problems: The role of emotion regulation. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36, 275–284.Google Scholar
- Zisser, A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2010). Treating oppositional behavior in children using parent-child interaction therapy. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents. 2nd edn (pp. 179–193). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar