Risk, Protection, and Adjustment among Youth with Incarcerated and Non-Resident Parents: A Mixed-Methods Study
- 544 Downloads
Parental incarceration has been increasingly recognized as a significant threat to the development and well-being of millions of American children and youth. After decades of documenting problems among youth with incarcerated parents, researchers have now started to emphasize the critical need for research on heterogeneity and competence in this population. Towards this end, we used a mixed-methods approach to identify different subgroups of youth with incarcerated and non-resident parents (n = 26) and to explore potential patterns of individual and family factors across groups. Cluster analysis suggested four different subgroups of youth that varied in the extent to which they exhibited behavior problems and competence. The majority of youth were classified as “adjusted” or “striving”, with comparatively few categorized as either “thriving” or “vulnerable”. Thematic analysis of qualitative data suggested that groups varied in terms of the extent to which they experienced economic and residential instability and challenges related to their social location, as well as caregiver positive expressiveness, agency, and social support. Results further indicated that although parental incarceration may be a part of an overall profile of risk, it does not appear to consistently distinguish youth separated from parents for different reasons in terms of patterns of adjustment and competence.
KeywordsParental incarceration Nonresident parents Risk factors Protective factors Adjustment
This paper is based on data from a pilot study funded by the Institute of Society, Culture, and Environment (ISCE) at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). The authors would like to thank the children and caregivers who participated in this study as well as the community-based organization that helped us recruit participants. We are also grateful to Amanda Capannola, Macy Halladay, Rachel Harr, and Lexi Jantz for their research assistance and to Amy Rauer for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
E. I. J.: Contributed to study design, conducted quantitative and qualitative data analyses, and wrote the paper. J. A.: designed and executed the study, contributed to the qualitative analyses, and collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. C. M.: conducted qualitative analyses and edited drafts of the paper.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Virginia Tech and the University of Tennessee.
Informed consent and assent were obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
- Besemer, S., & Murray, J. (2016). Incarceration and development of delinquency. In T. P. Beauchaine & S. P. Hinshaw (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Externalizing Spectrum Disorders (pp. 323–346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bowen, G. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5. http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/backissues/5_3/pdf/bowen.pdf.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Coddington, R. (1999). Coddington Life Events Scales (CLES) technical manual. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Collins, P. (2005). Black women and motherhood. In S. Hardy & C. Wiedmer (Eds.), Motherhood and space. Configurations of the maternal through politics, home, and the body (pp. 149–159). NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Dion, J., Matte-Gagné, C., Daigneault, I., Blackburn, M., Hébert, M., McDuff, P., Auclair, J., Veillette, S. & Perron, M. (2016). A prospective study of the impact of child maltreatment and friend support on psychological distress trajectory: From adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189, 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2001). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Gillespie, M. A. (1984). The myth of the strong Black woman. In A. M. Jaggar & P. S. Rothenberg (Eds.), Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of relations between women and men (pp. 32–35). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Kampfner, C. J. (1995). Post-traumatic stress reactions in children of imprisoned mothers. In K. Gabel & D. Johnston (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 89–100). New York, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Macia, L. (2015). Using clustering as a tool: Mixed methods in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1083–1094.Google Scholar
- Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development.. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Mooi, E. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). A concise guide to market research. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
- Murphey, D., & Cooper, P. M. (2015). Parents behind bars: What happens to their children? Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
- Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Collateral costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
- Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. E. A., Jeličić, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of Positive Youth Development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poehlmann, J., & Eddy, J. M. (2010). A research and intervention agenda for children and incarcerated parents. In J. Poehlmann & M. Eddy (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 311–341). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Poehlmann-Tynan, J. & Arditti, J. A. (in press). Developmental and family perspectives on parental incarceration. In C. Wildeman, A. Haskins & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), Minimizing collateral damage: Interdisciplinary perspectives and interventions to diminish the consequences of mass incarceration for children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Siegel, J. (2011). Disrupted childhoods: Children of women in prison. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100.Google Scholar
- Thomas, S. S., Smith, V. C., & Muhammad, B. M. (2016). Mass incarceration: Perpetuating the “habits of survival” and race identities of Black women caregivers to children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Criminal Justice and Law Review, 5, 95–115.Google Scholar
- Wallace, M. (1990). Black macho and the myth of the superwoman. New York, NY: The Dial Press.Google Scholar