Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1914–1928 | Cite as

Risk, Protection, and Adjustment among Youth with Incarcerated and Non-Resident Parents: A Mixed-Methods Study

  • Elizabeth I. Johnson
  • Joyce A. Arditti
  • Casey M. McGregor
Original Paper

Abstract

Parental incarceration has been increasingly recognized as a significant threat to the development and well-being of millions of American children and youth. After decades of documenting problems among youth with incarcerated parents, researchers have now started to emphasize the critical need for research on heterogeneity and competence in this population. Towards this end, we used a mixed-methods approach to identify different subgroups of youth with incarcerated and non-resident parents (n = 26) and to explore potential patterns of individual and family factors across groups. Cluster analysis suggested four different subgroups of youth that varied in the extent to which they exhibited behavior problems and competence. The majority of youth were classified as “adjusted” or “striving”, with comparatively few categorized as either “thriving” or “vulnerable”. Thematic analysis of qualitative data suggested that groups varied in terms of the extent to which they experienced economic and residential instability and challenges related to their social location, as well as caregiver positive expressiveness, agency, and social support. Results further indicated that although parental incarceration may be a part of an overall profile of risk, it does not appear to consistently distinguish youth separated from parents for different reasons in terms of patterns of adjustment and competence.

Keywords

Parental incarceration Nonresident parents Risk factors Protective factors Adjustment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on data from a pilot study funded by the Institute of Society, Culture, and Environment (ISCE) at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). The authors would like to thank the children and caregivers who participated in this study as well as the community-based organization that helped us recruit participants. We are also grateful to Amanda Capannola, Macy Halladay, Rachel Harr, and Lexi Jantz for their research assistance and to Amy Rauer for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author Contributions

E. I. J.: Contributed to study design, conducted quantitative and qualitative data analyses, and wrote the paper. J. A.: designed and executed the study, contributed to the qualitative analyses, and collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. C. M.: conducted qualitative analyses and edited drafts of the paper.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Virginia Tech and the University of Tennessee.

Informed Consent

Informed consent and assent were obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. Aaron, L., & Dallaire, D. (2010). Parental incarceration and multiple risk experiences: Effects on family processes and children’s delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1471–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, E. K., & Robbins, D. E. (2013). A latent class analysis of resilient development among early adolescents living in public housing. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arditti, J. A. (2015). Family process perspective on the heterogeneous effects of maternal incarceration on child wellbeing: The trouble with differences. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arditti, J. A. (2016). A family stress-proximal process model for understanding the effects of parental incarceration on children and their families. Couple and Family Psychology: Research & Practice, 5, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arditti, J., Burton, L., & Neeves-Botelho, S. (2010). Maternal distress and parenting in the context of cumulative disadvantage. Family Process, 49, 142–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, J. O., & Jones, W. H. (1995). The Parental Stress Scale: Initial psychometric evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Besemer, S., & Murray, J. (2016). Incarceration and development of delinquency. In T. P. Beauchaine & S. P. Hinshaw (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Externalizing Spectrum Disorders (pp. 323–346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boss, P. (2002). Family stress management: A contextual approach. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen, G. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5. http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/backissues/5_3/pdf/bowen.pdf.
  12. Brand, A., & Johnson, J. (1982). Note on the reliability of the Life Events Checklist. Psychological Reports, 50, 1274–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Cho, R. M. (2011). Understanding the mechanism behind maternal imprisonment and adolescent school dropout. Family Relations, 60, 272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2002). A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coddington, R. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coddington, R. (1999). Coddington Life Events Scales (CLES) technical manual. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.Google Scholar
  19. Collins, P. (2005). Black women and motherhood. In S. Hardy & C. Wiedmer (Eds.), Motherhood and space. Configurations of the maternal through politics, home, and the body (pp. 149–159). NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., Elder, Jr., G. H., Lorenz, F. O., Simons, R. L., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63, 526–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1994). Maternal depression and child development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 73–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dallaire, D., Zeman, J., & Thrash, T. (2014). Children’s experiences of maternal incarceration-specific risks: Predictions to psychological maladaptation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dion, J., Matte-Gagné, C., Daigneault, I., Blackburn, M., Hébert, M., McDuff, P., Auclair, J., Veillette, S. & Perron, M. (2016). A prospective study of the impact of child maltreatment and friend support on psychological distress trajectory: From adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189, 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2001). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research.Google Scholar
  25. Geller, A., Cooper, C. E., Garfinkel, I., Schwartz-Soicher, O., & Mincy, R. B. (2012). Beyond absenteeism: Father incarceration and child development. Demography, 49, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillespie, M. A. (1984). The myth of the strong Black woman. In A. M. Jaggar & P. S. Rothenberg (Eds.), Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of relations between women and men (pp. 32–35). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Giordano, P. C. (2010). Legacies of crime: A follow-up of the children of highly delinquent girls and boys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giordano, P. C., & Copp, J. E. (2015). “Packages” of risk: Implications for determining the effect of maternal incarceration on child wellbeing. Criminology and Public Policy, 14, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C. M., & Heyward, D. (2011). Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hagan, M. J., Sulik, M. J., & Lieberman, A. F. (2016). Traumatic life events and psychopathology in a high risk, ethnically diverse sample of young children: A person-centered approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 833–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halevi, G., Djalovski, A., Vengrober, A., & Feldman, R. (2016). Risk and resilience trajectories in war-exposed children across the first decade of life. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 1183–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanlon, T. E., Carswell, S. B., & Rose, M. (2007). Research on caretaking of children of incarcerated parents: Findings and their service delivery implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 384–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haskins, A. R. (2016). Beyond boys’ bad behavior: Paternal incarceration and cognitive development in middle adulthood. Social Forces, 95, 861–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henry, D., Dymnicki, A. B., Mohatt, N., Allen, J., & Kelly, J. G. (2015). Clustering methods and qualitative data: A mixed-methods approach for prevention research with small samples. Prevention Science, 16, 1007–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henry, D. B., Tolan, P. H., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2005). Cluster analysis in family psychology research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huebner, B. M., & Gustafson, R. (2007). The effect of maternal incarceration on adult offspring involvement in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, E. I., & Easterling, B. (2012). Understanding unique effects of parental incarceration on child well-being: Challenges, progress, and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson, E. I., & Easterling, B. (2015). Coping with confinement: Adolescents’ experiences with parental incarceration. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 244–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kampfner, C. J. (1995). Post-traumatic stress reactions in children of imprisoned mothers. In K. Gabel & D. Johnston (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 89–100). New York, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  40. Kjellstrand, J. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2011). Parental incarceration during childhood, family context, and youth problem behavior across adolescence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. V. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewin-Bizan, S., Doyle Lynche, A., Fay, K., Schmid, K., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Trajectories of positive and negative behaviors from early- to middle-adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 751–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O’Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 561–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Macia, L. (2015). Using clustering as a tool: Mixed methods in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1083–1094.Google Scholar
  45. Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development.. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. Martinez-Torteya, C., Miller-Graff, L. E., Howell, K. H., & Figge, C. (2017). Profiles of adaptation among child victims of suspected maltreatment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46, 840–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, K. M. (2007). Risk and resilience among African American children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 15, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milligan, G. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a dataset. Psychometrika, 50, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mooi, E. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). A concise guide to market research. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Mowbray, C. T., Bybee, D., Oyserman, D., Allen-Meares, P., MacFarlane, P., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Diversity of outcomes among adolescent children of mothers with mental illness. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murphey, D., & Cooper, P. M. (2015). Parents behind bars: What happens to their children? Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  54. Murray, J., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. (2012). Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance. Criminology, 50, 255–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Parental imprisonment: Long-lasting effects on boys’ internalizing problems through the life course. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2008). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and resiliency, in their own words. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1119–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oldehinkel, A. J., Ormel, J., Verhulst, F. C., & Nederhof, E. (2014). Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: A matter of both risk and resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1067–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patterson, J. M. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pearlin, L., Schieman, S., Fazio, E. M., & Meersman, S. C. (2005). Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Collateral costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
  62. Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. E. A., Jeličić, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of Positive Youth Development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Phillips, S., & Gates, T. (2011). A conceptual framework for understanding the stigmatization of children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Poehlmann, J., Eddy, J. M., Dallaire, D. H., Zeman, J. L., Myers, B. J., & Burraston, B. (2013). Relationship processes and resilience in children with incarcerated parents. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Poehlmann, J., & Eddy, J. M. (2010). A research and intervention agenda for children and incarcerated parents. In J. Poehlmann & M. Eddy (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 311–341). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  66. Poehlmann-Tynan, J. & Arditti, J. A. (in press). Developmental and family perspectives on parental incarceration. In C. Wildeman, A. Haskins & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), Minimizing collateral damage: Interdisciplinary perspectives and interventions to diminish the consequences of mass incarceration for children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  67. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodriguez, A. J., & Margolin, G. (2015). Parental incarceration, transnational migration, and military deployment: Family process mechanisms of youth adjustment to temporary parent absence. Child and Family Psychology Review, 18, 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sampson, R. J. (2011). The incarceration ledger: Toward a new era in assessing societal consequences. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sharp, S. F., & Marcus-Mendoza, S. T. (2001). It’s a family affair: Incarcerated women and their families. Women and Criminal Justice, 12, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Siegel, J. (2011). Disrupted childhoods: Children of women in prison. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100.Google Scholar
  73. Thomas, S. S., Smith, V. C., & Muhammad, B. M. (2016). Mass incarceration: Perpetuating the “habits of survival” and race identities of Black women caregivers to children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Criminal Justice and Law Review, 5, 95–115.Google Scholar
  74. Turanovic, J. J., Rodrigues, N., & Pratt, T. C. (2012). The collateral consequences of incarceration revisited: A qualitative analysis of the effects on caregivers of children of incarcerated parents. Criminology, 50, 913–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Turney, K. (2017). The unequal consequences of mass incarceration for children. Demography, 54, 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Turney, K., & Wildeman, C. (2015). Detrimental for some? Heterogeneous effects of maternal incarceration on child wellbeing. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Unger, M., Liebenberg, L., Dudding, P., Armstrong, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wallace, M. (1990). Black macho and the myth of the superwoman. New York, NY: The Dial Press.Google Scholar
  79. Ward, J. H. Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilbur, M. A. B., Marani, J. E., Appugliese, D., Woods, R., Siegel, J. A., Cabral, H. J., & Frank, D. A. (2007). Socioemotional effects of fathers’ incarceration on low-income, urban, school-aged children. Pediatrics, 120, e678–e685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wildeman, C. (2010). Paternal incarceration and children’s physically aggressive behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Social Forces, 89, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wildeman, C., Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2013). Misidentifying the effects of parental imprisonment? A comment on Johnson and Easterling (2012). Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Woods-Giscombé, C. L. (2010). Superwoman schema: African American women’s views on stress, strength, and health. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 668–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth I. Johnson
    • 1
  • Joyce A. Arditti
    • 2
  • Casey M. McGregor
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations