Portuguese Version of the Parent Cognition Scale (PCS): Measuring Parental Attributions About Children’s Misbehavior
- 132 Downloads
The Parent Cognition Scale (PCS) is a self-report measure that assesses the level of dysfunction in parental attributional style, regarding child-responsible and parent-causal attributions for their children’s misbehavior. This study aims to validate the PCS to the Portuguese context and to examine the factorial structure of this instrument.
The PCS is composed of 30 items and organized in 2 subscales: dysfunctional child-responsible and dysfunctional parent-causal attributions. Using a convenience sampling strategy, data were collected from 445 participants (317 mothers and 128 fathers) with children aged 3–12 years.
Results replicated the original structure of the scale and indicated an acceptable fit of the first order model, allowing the use of the 2 subscales. The final scale demonstrated an invariance across parents’ gender and economic and social situation. Good levels of internal consistency indicated that the scale is an appropriate measure.
The Portuguese version of the instrument is suitable for mothers and fathers within distinct economic and social situations. Some relevant contributions of the present study are highlighted, namely the need of studying and assessing parental attributions in clinical samples and particularly with at-risk parents within economic and social disadvantage contexts.
KeywordsParent cognition Dysfunctional child-responsible attributions Dysfunctional parent-causal attributions Children’s adjustment Self-report measure
The authors would like to sincerely thank all the families who took part in this study.
Conceptualization: M.F., I.N., M.P. Methodology: M.F., I.N., M.P., M.S.R. Supervision: I.N., M.P., M.S.R. Preparation of the original draft: M.F. Review and editing of the manuscript: M.F., I.N., M.P., M.S.R.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Faculty of Psychology (Lisbon University) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Participants gave written consent; it included detailed information about the study’s aims and procedures, the confidentiality and anonymity of the answers.
- Beckerman, M., van Berkel, S. R., Mesman, J., & Alink, L. R. A. (2017). The role of negative parental attributions in the associations between daily stressors, maltreatment history, and harsh and abusive discipline. Child Abuse & Neglect, 64, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.12.015.Google Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H., & Lansford, J. E. (2009). Parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), The handbook of cross-cultural developmental science (pp. 259–277). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Comissão Nacional de Promoção dos Direitos e Proteção das Crianças e Jovens. (2018, may). Relatório de Avaliação da Atividade das Comissões de Proteção de Crianças e Jovens. Retrieved from https://www.cnpdpcj.gov.pt/cpcj/relatorios-de-avaliacao-da-atividade-estatistica.aspx
- Dix, T. H., & Grusec, J. E. (1985). Parental attribution processes in child socialization. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: Their psychological consequences for children (pp. 201–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fleitlich, B., Loureiro, M. J., Fonseca, A., & Gaspar, F. (2004). Questionário do SDQ versão traduzida e adaptada para a população portuguesa.Google Scholar
- Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x.Google Scholar
- Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationsNew York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, M., Woolfson, M. L., & Hunter, S. C. (2017). Parental attributions of control for child behavior and their relation to discipline practices in parents of children with and without developmental delays. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(6), 1713–1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0676-x.Google Scholar
- Johnston, C., Hommersen, P., & Seipp, C. M. (2009). Maternal attributions and child oppositional behavior: a longitudinal study of boys with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(1), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014065.Google Scholar
- Katzmann, J., Hautmann, C., Greimel, L., Imort, S., Pinior, J., Scholz, K., & Döpfner, M. (2015). Dysfunktionale attributionen von eltern und ihre bedeutung für ihr erziehungsverhalten und für expansives problemverhalten von kindern: eine psychometrische überprüfung und anwendung der deutschen fassung des fragebogens zu dysfunktionalen elterlichen attributionen (FDEA). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 44(4), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000333.Google Scholar
- Katzmann, J., Hautmann, C., Greimel, L., Imort, S., Pinior, J., Scholz, K., & Döpfner, M. (2017). Behavioral and nondirective guided self-help for parents of children with externalizing behavior: mediating mechanisms in a head-to-head comparison. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(4), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0195-z.Google Scholar
- Kawabata, Y., Alink, L. R. A., Tseng, W. L., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Crick, N. R. (2011). Maternal and paternal parenting styles associated with relational aggression in children and adolescents: a conceptual analysis and meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 31(4), 240–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.08.001.Google Scholar
- Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attributions. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3th ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction.. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., Mestre, M. V., Samper-García, P., Tur-Porcar, A., Morales Mesa, S. A., & Viveros, E. F. (2014). Parental expectations and prosocial behavior of adolescents from low-income backgrounds: a cross-cultural comparison between three countries—Argentina, Colombia, and Spain. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(9), 1471–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114542284.Google Scholar
- Milner, J. S. (2000). Social information processing and child physical abuse: theory and research. In D. J. Hansen (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 46. Motivation and child maltreatment (pp. 39–84). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157.Google Scholar
- Nix, R. L., Pinderhughes, E. E., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & McFadyen-Ketchum, S. A. (1999). The relation between mothers’ hostile attribution tendencies and children’s externalizing behavior problems: the mediating role of mothers’ harsh discipline practices. Child Development, 70(4), 896–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00065.Google Scholar
- Petrenko, C. L. M., Pandolfino, M. E., & Roddenbery, R. (2016). The association between parental attributions of misbehavior and parenting practices in caregivers raising children with prenatal alcohol exposure: a mixed-methods study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 59, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.005.Google Scholar
- Pinderhughes, E. E., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2000). Discipline responses: influences of parents’ socioeconomic status, ethnicity, beliefs about parenting, stress, and cognitive-emotional processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(3), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3184.108.40.2060.Google Scholar
- Robinson, C., Mandleco, B., Olsen, S., & Hart, C. (2001). The parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire (PSDQ. In B. F. Perlmutter, J. Touliatos & G. W. Holden (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques: Vol. 3. Instruments & Index (pp. 319–321). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. R., Pidgeon, A. M., Gravestock, F., Connors, M. D., Brown, S., & Young, R. W. (2004). Does parental attributional retraining and anger management enhance the effects of the triple P—positive parenting program with parents at risk of child maltreatment? Behavior Therapy, 35(3), 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80030-3.Google Scholar
- Sheeber, L. B., Johnston, C., Chen, M., Leve, C., Hops, H., & Davis, B. (2009). Mothers’ and fathers’ attributions for adolescent behavior: an examination in families of depressed, subdiagnostic, and nondepressed youth. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 871–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016758.Google Scholar
- Snyder, J., Cramer, A., Afrank, J., & Patterson, G. R. (2005). The contributions of ineffective discipline and parental hostile attributions of child misbehavior to the development of conduct problems at home and school. Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.11.Google Scholar
- Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar