Assessing Parental Attributions through an Implicit Measure: Development and Evaluation of the Noncompliance IAT
Assessing parental attributions can be challenging given the reticence of some caregivers to report information that may be considered controversial or pejorative. To address this issue, recent efforts have focused on expanding existing parenting assessment batteries to include implicit measures. One of the most common methods for implicit assessment, the Implicit Association Test (IAT), had not yet been adapted to assess parental attributions. Two studies evaluated the psychometric properties (including convergent, concurrent, incremental, and predictive validity) of the novel Noncompliance IAT (N-IAT).
Study 1 included a low-risk sample of mothers (N = 60) of preschoolers. Study 2 included a diverse and higher risk sample of mothers and fathers who were assessed at three time points: immediately before the birth of their first child (N = 202 women; N = 144 male partners) and then 6 and 18 months after the birth.
Findings from both studies supported the utility of the N-IAT as a measure of implicit parental attributions. The N-IAT demonstrated evidence of convergent and concurrent validity (e.g., significant correlations with explicit attribution measures and with measures of parenting) in both studies. The longitudinal design of Study 2 allowed for the evaluation of incremental and predictive validity; N-IAT scores before childbirth predicted later N-IAT scores, with indications that the N-IAT could demonstrate incremental validity related to child abuse risk. Study 2 also demonstrated moderate test stability for mothers and fathers.
These results suggest that the N-IAT may be a helpful adjunct to assessments of parental attribution.
KeywordsImplicit Association Test Parent attributions Noncompliance Analog tasks Psychometrics
The first study was based on the doctoral dissertation of the first author with funding support provided by the Department of Psychology at Yale University. The second study was supported by an award from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the second author (Award # R15HD071431). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.
S.M.R Designed and executed Study 1, completed data analyses for Study 1, developed the N-IAT, worked with CMR in revising the N-IAT, and collaborated with C.M.R in writing the manuscript. C.M.R conducted Study 2 and performed those analyses.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Study 1 was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Study 2 was approved by the University of Alabama Birmingham IRB.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.
- Abidin, R. R. (1990). Parenting stress index professional manual. 3rd edn. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
- Abidin, R. R. (1992). The determinants of parenting behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 21, 407–412.Google Scholar
- Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- Aspland, H., & Gardner, F. (2003). Observational measures of parent‐child interaction: an introductory review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 8, 136–143.Google Scholar
- Bavolek, S. J., & Keene, R. G. (2001). Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2): Administration and development handbook. Park City, UT: Family Development Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
- Bennett, D. S., Sullivan, M. W., & Lewis, M. (2006). Relations of parental report and observation of parenting to maltreatment history. Child Maltreatment, 11, 63–75.Google Scholar
- Bianchi, S. M. (2009). What gives when mothers are employed? Dual-earner and single earner two-parent families. In D. R. Crane & E. J. Hill (Eds), Handbook of families and work: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 305–330). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
- Black, D. A., Heyman, R. E., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2001). Risk factors for child physical abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 121–188.Google Scholar
- Bugental, D. B., & Happaney, K. (2002). Parental attributions. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (vol. 3, pp. 539–605). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Conners, N. A., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Deere, D., Ledet, T., & Edwards, M. C. (2006). Measuring the potential for child maltreatment: the reliability and validity of the Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 39–53.Google Scholar
- Costello, A. H., & McNeil, C. B. (2014). Differentiating parents with faking-good profiles from parents with valid scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Journal of Family Violence, 29, 79–88.Google Scholar
- Dadds, M. R., Mullins, M. J., McAllister, R. A., & Atkinson, E. (2003). Attributions, affect, and behavior in abuse-risk mothers: a laboratory study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 21–45.Google Scholar
- Derogatis, L., & Cleary, P. (1977). Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL90: a study in construct validation. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 33, 981–989.Google Scholar
- Dishion, T., & Granic, T. (2004). Naturalistic observation of relationship processes. In S. N. Haynes, E. N. Helby & M. Hersen (Eds), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (vol. 3, pp.143–161). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dix, T., Reinhold, D. P., & Zambarano, R. J. (1990). Mothers’ judgments in moments of anger. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 465–486.Google Scholar
- Farc, M. M., Crouch, J. L., Skowronski, J. J., & Milner, J. S. (2008). Hostility ratings by parents at risk for child abuse: impact of chronic and temporary schema activation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 177–193.Google Scholar
- Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: a logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147.Google Scholar
- Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.Google Scholar
- Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.Google Scholar
- Haskett, M. E., Scott, S. S., Willoughby, M., Ahern, L., & Nears, K. (2006). The Parent Opinion Questionnaire and child vignettes for use with abusive parents: assessment of psychometric properties. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 137–151.Google Scholar
- Holden, G. W. (2015). Parenting: A dynamic perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Julian, T. W., McKenry, P. C., & McKelvey, M. W. (1994). Cultural variations in parenting: perceptions of Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, and Asian-American parents. Family Relations, 43, 30–37.Google Scholar
- Mash, E. J., & Johnston, C. (1990). Determinants of parenting stress: illustrations from families of hyperactive children and families of physically abuse children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 313–328.Google Scholar
- McElroy, E., & Rodriguez, C. M. (2008). Mothers of children with externalizing behavior problems: cognitive risk factors for abuse potential and discipline style and practices. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 774–784.Google Scholar
- Milner, J. S. (1986). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual. 2nd edn. Webster: Psyctec.Google Scholar
- Milner, J. S. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 547–583.Google Scholar
- Milner, J. S. (2000). Social information processing and child physical abuse: theory and research. In D. J. Hansen (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1998: Motivation and child maltreatment (vol. 46, pp. 39–84). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Montes, M. P., de Paul, J., & Milner, J. S. (2001). Evaluations, attributions, affect, and disciplinary choices in mothers at high and low risk for child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 1015–1036.Google Scholar
- Nelson, J. A., O’Brien, M., Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2013). Mothers’ and fathers’ negative responsibility attributions and perceptions of children’s problem behavior. Personal Relationships, 20, 719–727.Google Scholar
- Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: a methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265–292). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., & Fisher, P. A. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: bidirectional effects, causal models, and the search for parsimony. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Practical issues in parenting (vol. 5, pp. 59–88). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rabbitt, S. M. (2013). Noncompliance is in the eye of the beholder: the impact of a stress manipulation on maternal perceptions of child noncompliance. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C. M., Cook, A. E., & Jedrziewski, C. T. (2012). Reading between the lines: implicit assessment of the association of parental attributions and empathy with abuse risk. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 564–571.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C. M., Smith, T. L., & Silvia, P. J. (2016). Multimethod prediction of physical parent-child aggression risk in expectant mothers and fathers with social information processing theory. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 106–119.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C. M., & Tucker, M. C. (2015). Predicting physical child abuse risk beyond mental distress and social support: additive role of cognitive processes. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 24, 1780–1790.Google Scholar
- Smith Slep, A. M., & O'Leary, S. G. (1998). The effects of maternal attributions on parenting: an experimental analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 234–243.Google Scholar
- Yeung, W. J., Sandberg, J. F., Davi-Kean, P. E., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Children’s time with fathers in intact families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 136–154.Google Scholar