Advertisement

Estimating preferences for the performing arts from referendum votes

  • Katharina E. HoferEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The value of the performing arts to the population can be elicited from referendum outcomes. The analyses typically rely on the (strong) assumption of full voter turnout. I show theoretically that when turnout is ignored, coefficients of variables related positively (negatively) to turnout yield upward (downward)-biased coefficients. For an empirical application, I use the example of a 2009 referendum in the Swiss canton of St.Gallen regarding the public financing of the local theater. Taking into account the turnout decision yields statistically but not economically different estimates. Bayesian model averaging suggests that income, old age, political orientation, and travel time to the theater are most closely related to the vote outcome. The analysis is complemented by comparing voter characteristics from post-ballot surveys with municipal characteristics. Voters tend to exhibit characteristics which are positive drivers of support for the referendum. This suggests that support for cultural spending among voters might be larger than among the overall population.

Keywords

Public spending Referendum United voting theory Performing arts 

JEL Classification

Z110 Z180 H20 H40 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for comments received from Niklas Potrafke and Lukas Schmid, as well as participants at the International Conference on Cultural Economics 2016 in Valladolid.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bechtel, M. M., Hangartner, D., & Schmid, L. (2015). Does compulsory voting increase support for left policy? Evidence from Swiss referendums. American Journal of Political Science, 60, 752–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benito, B., Bastida, F., & Vicente, C. (2013). Municipal elections and cultural expenditure. Journal of Cultural Economics, 37(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Citrin, J., Schickler, E., & Sides, J. (2003). What if everyone voted? Simulating the impact of increased turnout in senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalle Nogare, C., & Galizzi, M. M. (2011). The political economy of cultural spending: Evidence from Italian cities. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(3), 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frey, B. S. (2013). Arts & economics: Analysis & cultural policy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1995). Public expenditure on the arts and direct democracy: The use of referenda in Switzerland. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Getzner, M. (2002). Determinants of public cultural expenditures: An exploratory time series analysis for Austria. Journal of Cultural Economics, 26(4), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Getzner, M. (2004). Voter preferences and public support for the performing arts: A case study for Austria. Empirica, 31(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hand, C. (2018). Do the arts make you happy? A quantile regression approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42(2), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, T. B. (1997). The willingness-to-pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansford, T. G., & Gomez, B. T. (2010). Estimating the electoral effects of voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 104(2), 268–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leininger, A., & Heyne, L. (2017). How representative are referendums? Evidence from 20 years of Swiss referendums. Electoral Studies, 48, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zerembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mellander, C., Florida, R., Rentfrow, P. J., & Potter, J. (2018). The geography of music preferences. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42(4), 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Navrud, S., & Ready, R. C. (2002). Valuing cultural heritage: Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Potrafke, N. (2013). Evidence on the political principal-agent problem from voting on public finance for concert halls. Constitutional Political Economy, 24(3), 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rushton, M. (2005). Support for earmarked public spending on culture: Evidence from a referendum in metropolitan Detroit. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(4), 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanders, M. S. (1998). Unified models of turnout and vote choice for two-candidate and three-candidate elections. Political Analysis, 7(1), 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneider, F., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1983). Private demand for public subsidies to the arts: A study in voting and expenditure theory. In W. S. Hendon & J. L. Shanahan (Eds.), Economics of cultural decisions (pp. 192–206). Cambridge: Abt Books.Google Scholar
  22. Schulze, G. G., & Ursprung, H. W. (2000). La donna e mobile—or is she? Voter preferences and public support for the performing arts. Public Choice, 102(1–2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Staatskanzlei St.Gallen (2009). Volksabstimmung vom, 27. September 2009. Kanton St.Gallen.Google Scholar
  24. Throsby, C. D. (1984). The measurement of willingness-to-pay for mixed goods. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46(4), 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Throsby, C. D., & Withers, G. A. (1986). Strategic bias and demand for public goods: Theory and an application to the arts. Journal of Public Economics, 31(3), 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trechsel, A. H., & Sciarini, P. (1998). Direct democracy in Switzerland: Do elites matter? European Journal of Political Research, 33(1), 99–124.Google Scholar
  27. Wheatley, D., & Bickerton, C. (2017). Subjective well-being and engagement in arts, culture and sport. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SEW-HSGUniversity of St.GallenSt.GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations