Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 36, Issue 9, pp 1823–1835 | Cite as

In vitro survival of follicles in prepubertal ewe ovarian cortex cryopreserved by slow freezing or non-equilibrium vitrification

  • Yann LocatelliEmail author
  • L. Calais
  • N. Duffard
  • L. Lardic
  • D. Monniaux
  • P. Piver
  • P. Mermillod
  • M. J. Bertoldo
Fertility Preservation
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Vitrification is a well-accepted fertility preservation procedure for cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos but little is known regarding ovarian tissue, for which slow freezing is the current convention. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficiency of non-equilibrium vitrification compared to conventional slow freezing for ovarian cortex cryopreservation.

Methods

Using prepubertal sheep ovaries, the capacity of the tissue to sustain folliculogenesis following cryopreservation and in vitro culture was evaluated. Ovarian cortex fragments were cultured in wells for 9 days, immediately or after cryopreservation by conventional slow freezing or non-equilibrium vitrification in straws. During culture, follicular populations within cortex were evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry for PCNA and TUNEL. Steroidogenic activity of the tissue was monitored by assay for progesterone and estradiol in spent media.

Results

No significant differences in follicle morphology, PCNA, or TUNEL labeling were observed between cryopreservation methods at the initiation of culture. Similar decreases in the proportion of primordial follicle population, and increases in the proportion of growing follicles, were observed following culture of fresh or cryopreserved ovarian tissue regardless of cryopreservation method. At the end of culture, PCNA and TUNEL-positive follicles were not statistically altered by slow freezing or vitrification in comparison to fresh cultured fragments.

Conclusions

Overall, for both cryopreservation methods, the cryopreserved tissue showed equal capacity to fresh tissue for supporting basal folliculogenesis in vitro. Taken together, these data confirm that both non-equilibrium vitrification and slow-freezing methods are both efficient for the cryopreservation of sheep ovarian cortex fragments.

Keywords

Fertility preservation Ovarian cortex Cryopreservation Vitrification In vitro folliculogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Thierry Delpuech for the collection of ovaries at slaughterhouse, Dr. Charlène Rico for the help with setup of culture conditions, and Corinne Laclie and Anne-Lyse Lainé from Laboratoire Phénotypage-Endocrinologie for the P4 assay.

Author contributions

YL designed and performed the experiments and analysis, wrote the manuscript, and secured the funding. LC performed the experiments and analysis and contributed to first draft of the manuscript. ND performed the experiments and LL performed the assay for estradiol. DM, PP, and PM contributed to experimental design and revised the manuscript. MJB performed the experiments and analysis, wrote, and revised the manuscript.

Funding

Dr. Michael J. Bertoldo, Laure Calais, and the laboratories involved in the present study were supported by a grant from “Région Centre” (CRYOVAIRE, Grant number no. 320000268).

References

  1. 1.
    Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:902–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wallace WHB, Kelsey TW. Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Apr 22];5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811725/
  3. 3.
    Donnez J, Dolmans M-M. Fertility preservation in women. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:735–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Vos M, Smitz J, Woodruff TK. Fertility preservation in women with cancer. Lancet. 2014;384:1302–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gosden RG, Baird DT, Wade JC, Webb R. Restoration of fertility to oophorectomized sheep by ovarian autografts stored at-196°C. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donnez J, Dolmans M, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C, Squifflet J, et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet. 2004;364:1405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donnez J, Dolmans M-M. Ovarian cortex transplantation: 60 reported live births brings the success and worldwide expansion of the technique towards routine clinical practice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jensen AK, Macklon KT, Fedder J, Ernst E, Humaidan P, Andersen CY. 86 successful births and 9 ongoing pregnancies worldwide in women transplanted with frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: focus on birth and perinatal outcome in 40 of these children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson RA, Wallace WHB. Fertility preservation in girls and young women. Clin Endocrinol. 2011;75:409–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gavish Z, Spector I, Peer G, Schlatt S, Wistuba J, Roness H, et al. Follicle activation is a significant and immediate cause of follicle loss after ovarian tissue transplantation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gavish Z, Peer G, Hadassa R, Yoram C, Meirow D. Follicle activation and “burn-out” contribute to post-transplantation follicle loss in ovarian tissue grafts: the effect of graft thickness. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:989–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt KT, Rosendahl M, Ernst E, Loft A, Andersen AN, Dueholm M, et al. Autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in 12 women with chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure: the Danish experience. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kagawa N, Silber S, Kuwayama M. Successful vitrification of bovine and human ovarian tissue. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;18:568–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Migishima F, Suzukimigishima R, Quintero R, Yokoyama M, Behr B. Successful pregnancies after transplantation of frozen–thawed mouse ovaries into chimeric mice that received lethal-dose radiation. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1080–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bordes A, Lornage J, Demirci B, Franck M, Courbiere B, Guerin JF, et al. Normal gestations and live births after orthotopic autograft of vitrified–warmed hemi-ovaries into ewes. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2745–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suzuki N, Yoshioka N, Takae S, Sugishita Y, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, et al. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:608–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang HJ, Moon JH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Optimal condition of vitrification method for cryopreservation of human ovarian cortical tissues. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 37:1092–101.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keros V, Xella S, Hultenby K, Pettersson K, Sheikhi M, Volpe A, et al. Vitrification versus controlled-rate freezing in cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1670–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amorim CA, Curaba M, Van Langendonckt A, Dolmans M-M, Donnez J. Vitrification as an alternative means of cryopreserving ovarian tissue. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23:160–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amorim CA, Dolmans M-M, David A, Jaeger J, Vanacker J, Camboni A, et al. Vitrification and xenografting of human ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1291–1298.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou X-H, Wu Y-J, Shi J, Xia Y, Zheng S-S. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue: comparison of novel direct cover vitrification and conventional vitrification. Cryobiology. 2010;60:101–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shi Q, Xie Y, Wang Y, Li S. Vitrification versus slow freezing for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-anlaysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Jul 7];7. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09005-7
  23. 23.
    Dalman A, Deheshkar Gooneh Farahani NS, Totonchi M, Pirjani R, Ebrahimi B, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M. Slow freezing versus vitrification technique for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: an evaluation of histological changes, WNT signaling pathway and apoptotic genes expression. Cryobiology. 2017;79:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fabbri R, Vicenti R, Macciocca M, Martino NA, Dell’Aquila ME, Pasquinelli G, et al. Morphological, ultrastructural and functional imaging of frozen/thawed and vitrified/warmed human ovarian tissue retrieved from oncological patients. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1838–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donfack NJ, Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha RMP, Bruno JB, Lima LF, et al. In vivo and in vitro strategies to support caprine preantral follicle development after ovarian tissue vitrification. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018;30:1055–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nikiforov D, Russo V, Nardinocchi D, Bernabò N, Mattioli M, Barboni B. Innovative multi-protectoral approach increases survival rate after vitrification of ovarian tissue and isolated follicles with improved results in comparison with conventional method. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11:65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Canépa S, Lainé A-L, Bluteau A, Fagu C, Flon C, Monniaux D. Validation d’une méthode immunoenzymatique pour le dosage de la progestérone dans le plasma des ovins et des bovins. Cah Techn Inra. 2008;64:19–30.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McDonald JH. Introduction - Handbook of Biological Statistics [Internet]. Handb Biol Stat. 3rd Ed. 2014. Available from: http://www.biostathandbook.com/
  29. 29.
    Bertoldo MJ, Bernard J, Duffard N, Tsikis G, Alves S, Calais L, et al. Inhibitors of c-Jun phosphorylation impede ovine primordial follicle activation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:338–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertoldo MJ, Walters KA, Ledger WL, Gilchrist RB, Mermillod P, Locatelli Y. In-vitro regulation of primordial follicle activation: challenges for fertility preservation strategies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Donfack NJ, Alves KA, Alves BG, Rocha RMP, Bruno JB, Lobo CH, et al. Xenotransplantation of goat ovary as an alternative to analyse follicles after vitrification. Reprod Domest Anim. 2019;54:216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Reinsberg J, Montag M, van der Ven K, Dorn C, et al. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue: comparison of rapid and conventional freezing. Cryobiology. 2007;55:261–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Isachenko V, Lapidus I, Isachenko E, Krivokharchenko A, Kreienberg R, Woriedh M, et al. Human ovarian tissue vitrification versus conventional freezing: morphological, endocrinological, and molecular biological evaluation. Reproduction. 2009;138:319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim JY. Control of ovarian primordial follicle activation. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012;39:10–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Carvalho AA, Faustino LR, Silva CMG, Castro SV, Luz HKM, Rossetto R, et al. Influence of vitrification techniques and solutions on the morphology and survival of preantral follicles after in vitro culture of caprine ovarian tissue. Theriogenology. 2011;76:933–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bandeira FT, Carvalho AA, Castro SV, Lima LF, Viana DA, Evangelista J, et al. Two methods of vitrification followed by in vitro culture of the ovine ovary: evaluation of the follicular development and ovarian extracellular matrix. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50:177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Adib S, Valojerdi MR, Alikhani M. Evaluation of apoptotic markers and tissue histology indicate a slight advantage of slow freezing method over vitrification for sheep ovarian tissues. Cryo-Letters. 2018;39:313–21.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vatanparast M, Khalili MA, Yari N, Omidi M, Mohsenzadeh M. Evaluation of sheep ovarian tissue cryopreservation with slow freezing or vitrification after chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane transplantation. Cryobiology. 2018;81:178–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bertoldo MJ, Duffard N, Bernard J, Frapsauce C, Calais L, Rico C, et al. Effects of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) supplementation during culture of the sheep ovarian cortex. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;149:124–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wandji SA, Srsen V, Nathanielsz PW, Eppig JJ, Fortune JE. Initiation of growth of baboon primordial follicles in vitro. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1997;12:1993–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Silva JRV, van den Hurk R, de Matos MHT, dos Santos RR, Pessoa C, de Moraes MO, et al. Influences of FSH and EGF on primordial follicles during in vitro culture of caprine ovarian cortical tissue. Theriogenology. 2004;61:1691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Merdassi G, Mazoyer C, Guerin JF, Saad A, Salle B, Lornage J. Examination of viability and quality of ovarian tissue after cryopreservation using simple laboratory methods in ewe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Faustino LR, Carvalho AA, Silva CMG, Rossetto R, Lopes CAP, van Tilburg MF, et al. Assessment of DNA damage in goat preantral follicles after vitrification of the ovarian cortex. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27:440–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tingen CM, Bristol-Gould SK, Kiesewetter SE, Wellington JT, Shea L, Woodruff TK. Prepubertal primordial follicle loss in mice is not due to classical apoptotic pathways1. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Isachenko E, Isachenko V, Rahimi G, Nawroth F. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue by direct plunging into liquid nitrogen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;108:186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boland NI, Humpherson PG, Leese HJ, Gosden RG. Pattern of lactate production and steroidogenesis during growth and maturation of mouse ovarian follicles in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liebenthron J, Köster M, Drengner C, Reinsberg J, van der Ven H, Montag M. The impact of culture conditions on early follicle recruitment and growth from human ovarian cortex biopsies in vitro. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:483–491.e5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Asadi E, Najafi A, Moeini A, Pirjani R, Hassanzadeh G, Mikaeili S, et al. Ovarian tissue culture in the presence of VEGF and fetuin stimulates follicle growth and steroidogenesis. J Endocrinol. 2017;232:205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Xu M, Banc A, Woodruff TK, Shea LD. Secondary follicle growth and oocyte maturation by culture in alginate hydrogel following cryopreservation of the ovary or individual follicles. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xu M, Barrett SL, West-Farrell E, Kondapalli LA, Kiesewetter SE, Shea LD, et al. In vitro grown human ovarian follicles from cancer patients support oocyte growth. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2531–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DMJZ, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de la RéserveZoologique de la Haute ToucheObterreFrance
  2. 2.INRA UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRANouzillyFrance
  3. 3.Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Mère-EnfantCHU de LimogesLimogesFrance
  4. 4.Fertility and Research Centre, School of Women’s and Children’s HealthUniversity of New South Wales SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.School of Medical SciencesUniversity of New South Wales SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations