Advertisement

Finding a Place for Networks in Archaeology

  • Matthew A. PeeplesEmail author
Article

Abstract

Formal network analyses have a long history in archaeology but have recently seen a rapid florescence. Network models drawing on approaches from graph theory, social network analysis, and complexity science have been used to address a broad array of questions about the relationships among network structure, positions, and the attributes and outcomes for individuals and larger groups at a range of social scales. Current archaeological network research is both methodologically and theoretically diverse, but there are still many daunting challenges ahead for the formal exploration of social networks using archaeological data. If we can face these challenges, archaeologists are well positioned to contribute to long-standing debates in the broader sphere of network research on the nature of network theory, the relationships between networks and culture, and dynamics of social networks over the long term.

Keywords

Social network analysis Complex networks Graph theory Complexity science Relational sociology Material culture GIS Agent-based modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Tom Brughmans, Carl Knappett, Barbara Mills, and five anonymous reviewers for providing insightful and extremely useful comments on this article that helped me focus on the discussion and strengthen key arguments. Many of the themes presented here have come out of discussions with my colleagues and students including (in alphabetical order) Jim Allison, Wes Bernardini, Lewis Borck, Ron Breiger, Tom Brughmans, Jeff Clark, Erik Gjesfjeld, Claudine Gravel-Miguel, Barbara Mills, John Roberts, Jr., Caitlin Wichlacz, and everyone on the Southwest Social Networks project team. I also thank Gary Feinman and Linda Nicholas at the Journal of Archaeological Research for helping shepherd this article toward publication.

References Cited

  1. Alexander, M. C., and Danowski, J. A. (1990). Analysis of an ancient network: Personal communication and the study of social structure in a past society. Social Networks 12: 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amati, V., Shafie, T., and Brandes, U. (2017). Reconstructing archaeological networks with structural holes. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 25: 1–28.Google Scholar
  3. Asif, M. T., Mitrovic, N., Dauwels, J., and Jaillet, P. (2016). Matrix and tensor based methods for missing data estimation in large traffic networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17: 1816–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks, Perseus Publishing, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Barabási, A.-L., and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations 7: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, J. A., and Harary, F. (1983). Graph theory in network analysis. Social Networks 5: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley, R. A., and Maschner, H. D. (2003a). Avalanches of ideas. In Bentley, R. A., and Maschner, H. D. (eds.), Complex Systems and Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 61–73.Google Scholar
  9. Bentley, R. A., and Maschner, H. D. (eds.) (2003b). Complex Systems and Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  10. Bentley, R. A., and Shennan, S. J. (2003). Cultural transmission and stochastic network growth. American Antiquity 68: 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentley, R. A., and Shennan, S. J. (2005). Random copying and cultural evolution. Science 309: 877–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentley, R., Lake, M., and Shennan, S. (2005). Specialisation and wealth inequality in a model of a clustered economic network. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1346–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernardini, W. (2007). Jeddito yellow ware and Hopi social networks. Kiva 72: 295–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernardini, W., and Peeples, M. A. (2015). Sight communities: The social significance of shared visual landmarks. American Antiquity 80: 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., and Sydow, J. (2017). Network ethnography: A mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organizational Research Methods 20: 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bevan, A., and Wilson, A. (2013). Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 2415–2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Biggs, N., Lloyd, E. K., and Wilson, R. J. (1976). Graph Theory, 1736–1936, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Birch, J., and Hart, J. P. (2018). Social networks and Northern Iroquoian confederacy dynamics. American Antiquity 83: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blair, E. H. (2015). Making Mission Communities: Population Aggregation, Social Networks, and Communities of Practice at 17th Century Mission Santa Catalina de Guale, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  20. Blake, E. (2013). Social networks, path dependence, and the rise of ethnic groups in pre-Roman Italy. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blake, E. (2014). Social Networks and Regional Identity in Bronze Age Italy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Boissevain, J. (1979). Network analysis: A reappraisal. Current Anthropology 20: 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Borck, L. (2016). Lost Voices Found: An Archaeology of Contentious Politics in the Greater Southwest, AD 1100–1450, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  24. Borck, L., Mills, B. J., Peeples, M. A., and Clark, J. J. (2015). Are social networks survival networks? An example from the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Borgatti, S. P., and Halgin, D. S. (2011a). Analyzing affiliation networks. In Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 417–433.Google Scholar
  27. Borgatti, S. P., and Halgin, D. S. (2011b). On network theory. Organization Science 22: 1168–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., and Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323: 892–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bott, E. (1955). Urban families: Conjugal roles and social networks. Human Relations 8: 345–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bott, E. (1957). Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  31. Bowser, B. J., and Patton, J. Q. (2008). Learning and tramsmission of pottery style: Women’s life histories and communities of practice in the Ecuadorian Amazon. In Stark, M. T., Bowser, B. J., and Horne, L. (eds.), Cultural Transmission and Material Culture: Breaking Down Boundaries, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 105–129.Google Scholar
  32. Brandes, U., Robins, G., McCrainie, A. N., and Wasserman, S. (2013). What is network science? Network Science 1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Braun, D. P., and Plog, S. (1982). Evolution of “tribal” social networks: Theory and prehistoric North American evidence. American Antiquity 47: 504–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces 53: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Brint, S. (1992). Hidden meanings: Cultural content and context in Harrison White’s structural sociology. Sociological Theory 10: 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Broodbank, C. (2000). An Island Archaeology of the Early Cyclades, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Brughmans, T. (2010). Connecting the dots: Towards archaeological network analysis. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 29: 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Brughmans, T. (2012). Facebooking the past : A critical social network analysis approach for archaeology. In Chrysanthi, A., Flores, M. P., and Papadopoulos, C. (eds.), Thinking beyond the Tool: Archaeological Computing and the Interpretative Process, BAR International Series, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 191–203.Google Scholar
  39. Brughmans, T. (2013a). Networks of networks: A citation network analysis of the adoption, use and adaptation of formal network techniques in archaeology. Literary and Linguistic Computing, The Journal of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 28: 538–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Brughmans, T. (2013b). Thinking through networks: A review of formal network methods in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 20: 623–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Brughmans, T. (2014). The roots and shoots of archaeological network analysis: A citation analysis and review of the archaeological use of formal network methods. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 18–41.Google Scholar
  42. Brughmans, T., and Brandes, U. (2017). Visibility network patterns and methods for studying visual relational phenomena in archeology. Frontiers in the Digital Humanities 4: article 17.Google Scholar
  43. Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.) (2016). The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Brughmans, T., Keay, S., and Earl, G. (2014). Introducing exponential random graph models for visibility networks. Journal of Archaeological Science 49: 442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Brughmans, T., Keay, S., and Earl, G. (2015). Understanding inter-settlement visibility in Iron Age and Roman southern Spain with exponential random graph models for visibility networks. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 58–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Brughmans, T., and Peeples, M. A. (2017). Trends in archaeological network research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Historical Network Research 1: 1–24.Google Scholar
  47. Brughmans, T., and Poblome, J. (2016a). MERCURY: An agent-based model of tableware trade in the Roman east. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 19: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/19/1/3.html.
  48. Brughmans, T., and Poblome, J. (2016b). Pots in space: Understanding Roman pottery distribution from confronting exploratory and geographical network analyses. In Barker, E., Bouzarovski, S., Pelling, C., and Isaksen, L. (eds.), New Worlds from Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 255–280.Google Scholar
  49. Brughmans, T., and Poblome, J. (2016c). Roman bazaar or market economy? Explaining tableware distributions through computational modelling. Antiquity 350: 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Brughmans, T., Waal, M. S. de, Hofman, C. L., and Brandes, U. (2017). Exploring transformations in Caribbean indigenous social networks through visibility studies: The case of late pre-colonial landscapes in East-Guadeloupe (French West Indies). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 25: 1–45.Google Scholar
  51. Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Butts, C. T. (2009). Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325: 414–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Cegielski, W. H., and Rogers, J. D. (2016). Rethinking the role of agent-based modeling in archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 41: 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Chorley, R. J., and Haggett, P. (1967). Models in Geography, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  55. Clarke, D. L. (1968). Analytical Archaeology, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  56. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., and Newman, M. E. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 51: 661–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Cline, D., and Cline, E. (2015). Text messages, tablets, and social networks: The “small world” of the Amarna letters. In Mynářová, J., Onderka, P., and Pavúk, P. (eds.), There and Back Again—The Crossroads II, Charles University, Prague, pp.17–44.Google Scholar
  58. Cochrane, E. E., and Lipo, C. (2010). Phylogenetic analyses of Lapita decoration do not support branching evolution or regional population structure during colonization of Remote Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 365: 3889–3902.Google Scholar
  59. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Collar, A. (2007). Network theory and religious innovation. Mediterranean Historical Review 22: 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Collar, A. C. (2008). Networks and Religious Innovation in the Roman Empire, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History, University of Exeter, Exeter.Google Scholar
  62. Collar, A. C. (2015). Religious Networks in the Roman Empire: The Spread of New Ideas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  63. Collar, A., Coward, F., Brughmans, T., and Mills, B. J. (2015). Networks in archaeology: Phenomena, abstraction, representation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Collins-Elliott, S. A. (2017). Bayesian inference with Monte Carlo approximation: Measuring regional differentiation in ceramic and glass vessel assemblages in Republican Italy, ca. 200 BCE–20 CE. Journal of Archaeological Science 80: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Cong, J., and Liu, H. (2014). Approaching human language with complex networks. Physics of Life Reviews 11: 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Conolly, J., and Lake, M. (2006). Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Coward, F. (2010). Small worlds, material culture and ancient Near Eastern social networks. Proceedings of the British Academy 158: 449–479.Google Scholar
  68. Coward, F. (2013). Grounding the net: Social networks, material culture and geography in the Epipalaeolithic and early Neolithic of the Near East (~21–6,000 cal BCE). In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology. New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 247–280.Google Scholar
  69. Coward, F. (2016). Scaling up: Material culture as scaffold for the social brain. Quaternary International 405: 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Crabtree, S. A. (2015). Inferring Ancestral Pueblo social networks from simulation in the central Mesa Verde. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Crabtree, S. A., Vaughn, L. J., and Crabtree, N. T. (2017). Reconstructing Ancestral Pueblo food webs in the southwestern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 81: 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Crema, E. R. (2012). Modelling temporal uncertainty in archaeological analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19: 440–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. David, N., and Kramer, C. (2001). Ethnoarchaeology in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Davis, A., Gardner, B. B., and Gardner, M. R. (1941). Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  75. Dobres, M.-A., and Hoffman, C. R. (1994). Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 211–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Dolwick, J. S. (2009). ‘The social’ and beyond: Introducing actor-network theory. Journal of Maritime Archaeology 4: 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Doran, J. E., and Hodson, F. R. (1975). Mathematics and Computers in Archaeology, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  78. Dunne, J. A., Maschner, H., Betts, M. W., Huntly, N., Russell, R., Williams, R. J., and Wood, S. A. (2016). The roles and impacts of human hunter-gatherers in North Pacific marine food webs. Scientific Reports 6: 21179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Düring, M. (2016). How reliable are centrality measures for data collected from fragmentary and heterogeneous historical sources? A case study. In Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
  80. Earl, G., and Keay, S. (2007). Urban connectivity of Iberian and Roman towns in southern Spain: A network analysis approach. In Clark, J. T., and Haagenmeister, E. M. (eds.), Digital Discovery: Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA Conference, Fargo, 2006, Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp. 77–86.Google Scholar
  81. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Emirbayer, M., and Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology 99: 1411–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Evans, J. (1989). Neutron activation analysis and Romano-British pottery studies. In Henderson, J. (ed.), Scientific Analysis in Archaeology, Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 136–162.Google Scholar
  84. Evans, S., and Felder, K. (2014). Making the connection: Changing perspectives on social networks. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 9–17.Google Scholar
  85. Evans, T. (2016). Which network model should I use? Towards a quantitative comparison of spatial network models in archaeology. In Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 149–173.Google Scholar
  86. Everton, S. F. (2012). Disrupting Dark Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Faust, K. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks 19: 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Fentress, E., and Perkins, P. (1988). Counting African red slip ware. In Mastino, A. (ed.), L’Africa romana: Atti Del V Convegno Di Studio Sassari, 11–13 dicembre 1987, Università di Sassari, Sassari, pp. 205–214.Google Scholar
  89. Ferreira-Lopes, P., and Pinto-Puerto, F. (2018). GIS and graph models for social, temporal and spatial digital analysis in heritage: The case-study of ancient Kingdom of Seville Late Gothic production. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 9: e00074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Field, S., Frank, K. A., Schiller, K., Riegle-Crumb, C., and Muller, C. (2006). Identifying positions from affiliation networks: Preserving the duality of people and events. Social Networks 28: 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Freeman, L. C. (2000). Visualizing social networks. JoSS: Journal of Social Structure 1: https://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Freeman.html.
  92. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  93. Freeman, L. C. (2005). Graphic techniques for exploring social network data. In Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., and Wasserman, S. (eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Freund, K. P., and Batist, Z. (2014). Sardinian obsidian circulation and early maritime navigation in the Neolithic as shown through social network analysis. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 9: 364–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Gjesfjeld, E. (2015). Network analysis of archaeological data from hunter-gatherers: Methodological problems and potential solutions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Gjesfjeld, E., and Phillips, S. C. (2013). Evaluating adaptive network strategies with geochemical sourcing data: A case study from the Kuril Islands. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 281–306.Google Scholar
  97. Golitko, M., and Feinman, G. M. (2015). Procurement and distribution of pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican obsidian 900 BC–AD 1520: A social network analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 206–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Golitko, M., Meierhoff, J., Feinman, G. M., and Williams, P. R. (2012). Complexities of collapse: The evidence of Maya obsidian as revealed by social network graphical analysis. Antiquity 86: 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Golubiewski-Davis, K. (2018). From 3D scans to networks: Using swords to understand communities of central European Bronze Age smiths. Open Archaeology 4: 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Gosselain, O. P. (2000). Materializing identities: An African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Graham, S. (2005). Agent-based modelling, archaeology and social organisation: The robustness of Rome. The Archaeological Computing Newsletter 63: 1–6.Google Scholar
  102. Graham, S. (2006). Networks, agent-based models and the Antonine Itineraries: Implications for Roman archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 19: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Graham, S., and Weingart, S. (2015). The equifinality of archaeological networks: An agent-based exploratory lab approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 248–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Gravel-Miguel, C. (2016). Using species distribution modeling to contextualize Lower Magdalenian social networks visible through portable art stylistic similarities in the Cantabrian region (Spain). Quaternary International 412: 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Groenhuijzen, M. R., and Verhagen, P. (2016). Testing the robustness of local network metrics in research on archeological local transport networks. Frontiers in the Digital Humanities. 3: e00006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Habiba, Athenstädt, Jan C., Mills, B. J., and Brandes, U. (2018). Social networks and similarity of site assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 92: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Hage, P. (1977). Centrality in the Kula Ring. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 86: 27–36.Google Scholar
  109. Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1983). Structural Models in Anthropology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  110. Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1991). Exchange in Oceania: A Graph Theoretic Analysis, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  111. Hage, P., and Harary, F. (1996). Island Networks: Communication, Kinship and Classification Structures in Oceania, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  112. Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., and Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  113. Hart, J. P. (2012). The effects of geographical distances on pottery assemblage similarities: A case study from northern Iroquoia. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Hart, J. P., Birch, J., and St-Pierre, C. G. (2017). Effects of population dispersal on regional signaling networks: An example from northern Iroquoia. Science Advances 3: e1700497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Hart, J. P., and Engelbrecht, W. (2012). Northern Iroquoian ethnic evolution: A social network analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 19: 322–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Hart, J. P., Shafie, T., Birch, J., Dermarkar, S., and Williamson, R. F. (2016). Nation building and social signaling in southern Ontario: AD 1350–1650. PLoS One 11: e0156178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Hegmon, M. (2000). Advances in ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 129-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Hill, J. B., Peeples, M. A., Huntley, D. L., and Carmack, H. J. (2015). Spatializing social network analysis in the late precontact U.S. Southwest. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3: 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Hillier, B., and Hanson, J. (1989). The Social Logic of Space, Reprint edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  120. Hodder, I. (1978). Social organisation and human interaction: The development of some tentative hypotheses in terms of material culture. In Hodder, I. (ed.), The Spatial Organization of Culture, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 199–269.Google Scholar
  121. Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Hodder, I., and Mol, A. (2016). Network analysis and entanglement. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23: 1066–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Hunt, T. L. (1988). Graph theoretic network models for Lapita exchange: A trial application. In Kirch, P. V., and Hunt, T. L. (eds.), Archaeology of the Lapita Cultural Complex: A Critical Review, Research Reports No. 5, Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum, Seattle, pp. 135–155.Google Scholar
  124. Irwin, G. (1978). Pots and entrepots: A study of settlement, trade and the development of economic specialization in Papuan prehistory. World Archaeology 9: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Irwin-Williams, C. (1977). A network model for the analysis of prehistoric trade. In Earle, T. K., and Ericson, J. E. (eds.), Exchange Systems in Prehistory, Academic Press, New York, pp. 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Isaksen, L. (2007). Network analysis of transport vectors in Roman Baetica. In Clark, J. T., and Hagenmeister, E. M. (eds.), Digital Discovery: Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA Conference, Fargo, 2006, Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp. 64–76.Google Scholar
  127. Isaksen, L. (2008). The application of network analysis to ancient transport geography: A case study of Roman Baetica. Digital Medievalist 4: http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/4/isaksen.
  128. Isaksen, L. (2013). ‘O what a tangled web we weave’ – Towards a practice that does not deceive. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology. New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 43–70.Google Scholar
  129. Jelinek, A. J. (1960). An Archaeological Survey of the Middle Pecos River Valley and the Adjacent Llano Estacado, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  130. Jelinek, A. J. (1967). A Prehistoric Sequence in the Middle Pecos Valley, New Mexico, Anthropological Papers No. 31, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  131. Jenkins, D. (2001). A network analysis of Inka roads, administrative centers, and storage facilities. Ethnohistory 48: 655–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Jennings, B. (2016). Exploring late Bronze Age systems of bronzework production in Switzerland through network science. STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research 2: 90–112.Google Scholar
  133. Johnson, K. M. (2016). Ethnicity, Family, and Social Networks: A Multiscalar Bioarchaeological Investigation of Tiwanaku Colonial Organization in the Moquegua Valley, Peru, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
  134. Jørgensen, E. K. (2016). Typifying scientific output: A bibliometric analysis of archaeological publishing across the science/humanities spectrum (2009–2013). Danish Journal of Archaeology 4: 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Kandler, A., and Caccioli, F. (2016). Networks, homophily and the spread of innovations. In Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 175–197.Google Scholar
  136. Kendall, D. (1969). Incidence matrices, interval graphs and seriation in archeology. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 28: 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Kendall, D. G. (1971a). Maps from marriages: An application of non-metric multi-dimensional scaling to parish register data. In Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G., and Tăutu, P. (eds.), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, Proceedings of the Anglo-Romanian Conference, Mamaia 1970, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 303–318.Google Scholar
  138. Kendall, D. G. (1971b). Seriation from abundance matrices. In Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G., and Tăutu, P. (eds.), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, Proceedings of the Anglo-Romanian Conference, Mamaia 1970, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 215–252.Google Scholar
  139. Kim, H., and Bearman, P. S. (1997). The structure and dynamics of movement participation. American Sociological Review 62: 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Knappett, C. (2011). An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Knappett, C. (2013a). Introduction: Why networks? In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology. New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Knappett, C. (ed.) (2013b). Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  143. Knappett, C., Evans, T., and Rivers, R. (2011). The Theran eruption and Minoan palatial collapse: New interpretations gained from modelling the maritime network. Antiquity 85: 1008–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Knoke, D. H., and Yang, S. (2008). Social Network Analysis, 2nd ed., SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Knox, H., Savage, M., and Harvey, P. (2006). Social networks and the study of relations: Networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society 35: 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Kramer, C. (1985). Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Krinsky, J., and Mische, A. (2013). Formations and formalisms: Charles Tilly and the paradox of the actor. Annual Review of Sociology 39: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Ladyman, J., Lambert, J., and Wiesner, K. (2013). What is a complex system? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3: 33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., and Prensky, D. (1992). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In Freeman, L. C., White, D. R., and Romney, A. K. (eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
  150. Lemercier, C. (2015). Formal network methods in history: Why and how? Social Networks, Political Institutions, and Rural Societies, Brepols, Turnhout, Belgium, pp. 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Lulewicz, J., and Coker, A. B. (2018). The structure of the Mississippian world: A social network approach to the organization of sociopolitical interactions. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 50: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Lulewicz, J. J. (2018). Network Histories of Southern Appalachia, AD 600-1600, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  153. Mackie, Q. (2001). SettlementArchaeology in a Fjordland Archipelago: Network Analysis, Social Practice and the Built Environment of Western Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada since 2,000 BP, Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
  154. Marin, A., and Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, SAGE, London, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
  155. Maschner, H. D., and Bentley, R. A. (2003). The power-law of rank and household on the north Pacific. In Bentley, R. A., and Maschner, H. D. (eds.), Complex Systems and Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
  156. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Menze, B. H., and Ur, J. (2012). Mapping patterns of long-term settlement in northern Mesopotamia at a large scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109: 778–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Merrill, M., and Read, D. (2010). A new method using graph and lattice theory to discover spatially cohesive sets of artifacts and areas of organized activity in archaeological sites. American Antiquity 75: 419–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Mickel, A. (2016). Tracing teams, texts, and topics: Applying social network analysis to understand archaeological knowledge production at Çatalhöyük. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23: 1095–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. APA PsycNET 1: 61–67.Google Scholar
  162. Mills, B. J. (2016). Communities of consumption: Cuisines as constellated networks of situated practice. In Roddick, A. P., and Stahl, A. B. (eds.), Knowledge in Motion: Constellations of Learning across Time and Place, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 247–270.Google Scholar
  163. Mills, B. J. (2017). Social network analysis in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 46: 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Peeples, M. A., Haas, W. R., Roberts, J. M., Hill, J. B. et al. (2013a). Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110: 5785–5790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Mills, B. J., Peeples, M. A., Aragon, L. D., Bellorado, B. A., Clark, J. J., Giomi, E. and Windes, T. C. (2018). Evaluating Chaco migration scenarios using dynamic social network analysis. Antiquity 92 in press.Google Scholar
  166. Mills, B. J., Peeples, M. A., Haas, Jr., W. R., Borck, L., Clark, J. J. and Roberts, Jr., J. M. (2015). Multiscalar perspectives on social networks in the late prehispanic Southwest. American Antiquity 80: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Mills, B. J., Roberts, J. M., Clark, J. J., Jr., W. R. H., Huntley, D., Peeples, M. A., Borck, L. et al. (2013b). The dynamics of social networks in the late prehispanic U.S. Southwest. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 181–202.Google Scholar
  168. Mische, A. (2011). Relational sociology, culture, and agency. In Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 80–97.Google Scholar
  169. Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In Mitchell, J. C. (ed.), Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analysis of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
  170. Mitchell, J. C. (1974). Social networks. Annual Review of Anthropology 3: 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Mizoguchi, K. (2009). Nodes and edges: A network approach to hierarchisation and state formation in Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28: 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Mizoguchi, K. (2013). Evolution of prestige good systems: an application of network analysis to the transformation of communication systems and their media. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Mol, A. A., Hoogland, M. L., and Hofman, C. L. (2015). Remotely local: Ego-networks of late pre-colonial (AD 1000–1450) Saba, North-eastern Caribbean. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Mol, E. (2012). Hidden Complexities of the Frankish Castle: Social Aspects of Space in the Configurational Architecture of Frankish Castles in the Holy Land, 1099-1291, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  175. Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive: A New Approach to the Problem of Human Interrelations, Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Munson, J. (2015). From metaphors to practice. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 428–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Munson, J., Amati, V., Collard, M., and Macri, M. J. (2014). Classic Maya bloodletting and the cultural evolution of religious rituals: Quantifying patterns of variation in hieroglyphic texts. PLxS One 9: e107982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Munson, J. L., and Macri, M. J. (2009). Sociopolitical network interactions: A case study of the Classic Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28: 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Nadel, S. F. (1957). The Theory of Social Structure, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  180. Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Newman, M. E. (2004). Detecting community structure in networks. European Physical Journal B 38: 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Newman, M. E. (2011). Complex systems: A survey. American Journal of Physics 79: 800–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Nexon, D. H. (2009). The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Opsahl, T. (2013). Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients. Social Networks 35: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Orengo, H. A., and Livarda, A. (2016). The seeds of commerce: A network analysis-based approach to the Romano-British transport system. Journal of Archaeological Science 66: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Orser Jr., C. (2005). Network theory and the archaeology of modern history. In Funari, P., Zarankin, A., and Stovel, E. (eds.), Global Archaeological Theory SE - 7, Springer, New York, pp. 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Ortman, S. G. (2016). Uniform probability density analysis and population history in the northern Rio Grande. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Ortman, S. G., Varien, M. D., and Gripp, T. L. (2007). Empirical Bayesian methods for archaeological survey data: An application from the Mesa Verde region. American Antiquity 72: 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Ossa, A. (2013). Using network expectations to identify multiple exchange systems: A case study from Postclassic Sauce and its hinterland in Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 32: 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Östborn, P., and Gerding, H. (2014). Network analysis of archaeological data: A systematic approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 46: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Pablo, J. F.-L. de, and Barton, C. M. (2015). Bayesian estimation dating of lithic surface collections. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 559–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Pachucki, M. A., and Breiger, R. L. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Padgett, J. F., and Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Pailes, M. (2014). Social network analysis of early classic Hohokam corporate group inequality. American Antiquity 79: 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Papo, D., Buldú, J. M., Boccaletti, S., and Bullmore, E. T. (2014). Complex network theory and the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 1–7.Google Scholar
  196. Park, E. (2005). The Internet as a Large-Scale Complex System, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  197. Peeples, M. A. (2011). Identity and Social Transformation in the Prehispanic Cibola World: AD 1150–1325, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
  198. Peeples, M. A. (2017). Network science and statistical techniques for dealing with uncertainties in archaeological datasets (consulted May 2018: http://www.mattpeeples.net/netstats.html).
  199. Peeples, M. A. (2018). Connected Communities: Networks, Identities, and Social Change in the Ancient Cibola World, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Peeples, M. A., and Haas, W. R. (2013). Brokerage and social capital in the prehispanic U.S. Southwest. American Anthropologist 115: 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Peeples, M. A., and Mills, B. J. (2018). Frontiers of marginality and mediation in the U.S. Southwest: A social networks perspective. In Harry, K., and Herr, S. (eds.), Life Beyond the Boundaries: Constructing Identity in Edge Regions of the North American Southwest, University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp. 25–56.Google Scholar
  202. Peeples, M. A., Mills, B. J., Haas, W. R., Clark, J. J., and Roberts, J. M. (2016a). Analytical challenges for the application of social network analysis in archaeology. In Brughmans, T, Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
  203. Peeples, M. A. and Roberts, J. M. (2013). To binarize or not to binarize: Relational data and the construction of archaeological networks. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 3001–3010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Peeples, M. A., and Roberts, J. M. (2017). Bootstrap and empirical Bayesian methods for assessing variability in archaeological networks. Paper presented at the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  205. Peeples, M., Clark, J., Doelle, W. H., Laurenzi, and Mills, B. J. (2016b). The big picture: The National Historic Preservation Act and regional syntheses in the U.S. Southwest. Journal of Arizona Archaeology 4: 1–9.Google Scholar
  206. Peregrine, P. (1991). A graph-theoretic approach to the evolution of Cahokia. American Antiquity 56: 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Phillips, S. C. (2011). Networked Glass: Lithic Raw Material Consumption and Social Networks in the Kuril Islands, Far Eastern Russia, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
  208. Pitts, F. R. (1965). A graph theoretic approach to historical geography. The Professional Geographer 17: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Pitts, F. R. (1978). The medieval river trade network of Russia revisited. Social Networks 1: 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Prignano, L., Morer, I., and Diaz-Guilera, A. (2017). Wiring the past: A network science perspective on the challenge of archeological similarity networks. Frontiers in the Digital Humanities. 4: e00013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Rivers, R. (2016). Can archaeological models always fulfil our prejudices? In Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 123–147.Google Scholar
  212. Rivers, R., and Evans, T. S. (2013). What makes a site important? Centrality, gateways and gravity. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Rivers, R., and Evans, T. S. (2014). New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure. Nouvelles de l’archéologie 135: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Rivers, R., Knappett, C., and Evans, T. (2013). Network models and archaeological spaces. In Bevan, A., and Lake, M. (eds.), Computational Approaches to Archaeological Spaces, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 99–126.Google Scholar
  215. Roberts, J. M., Jr., Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Haas Jr., W. R., Huntley, D. L., and Trowbridge, M. A. (2012). A method for chronological apportioning of ceramic assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 1513–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Rocha, L. E. (2017). Dynamics of air transport networks: A review from a complex systems perspective. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 30: 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Rothman, M. (1987). Graph theory and the interpretation of regional survey data. Paléorient 13: 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Ryan, L., and D’Angelo, A. (2017). Changing times: Migrants’ social network analysis and the challenges of longitudinal research. Social Networks 53: 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Salathé, M., and Jones, J. H. (2010). Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure. PLOS Computational Biology 6: e1000736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Santley, R. S. (1991). The structure of the Aztec transport network. In Trombold, C. D. (ed.), Acient Road Networks and Settlement Hierarchies in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 198–210.Google Scholar
  221. Santoro, M. (2008). Framing notes. Sociologica 1/2008: e194.Google Scholar
  222. Schachner, G., Huntley, D. L., and Duff, A. I. (2011). Changes in regional organization and mobility in the Zuni region of the American Southwest during the Pueblo III and IV periods: Insights from INAA studies. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 2261–2273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Scheidel, W., and Meeks, E. (2017). ORBIS: The Stanford geospatial network model of the Roman world (consulted September 2017: http://orbis.stanford.edu/).
  224. Schich, M., Hidalgo, C. A., Lehmann, S. J., and Park, J. (2009). The network of subject co-popularity in classical archaeology. Bollettino di Archeologia Online, Volume Speciale: 49–57.Google Scholar
  225. Scholnick, J. B., Munson, J. L., and Macri, M. J. (2013). Positioning power in a multi-relational framework: A social network analysis of Classic Maya political rhetoric. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Schortman, E. M., and Urban, P. A. (1987). Modeling interregional interaction in prehistory. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 11: 37–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Schortman, E. M., and Urban, P. A. (2012). Enacting power through networks. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31: 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Scott, J. (2011). Social physics and social networks. In Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 55–66.Google Scholar
  229. Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.) (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 1st ed., SAGE Publications, London.Google Scholar
  230. Shackley, M. S. (2005). Obsidian: Geology and Archaeology in the North American Southwest, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  231. Sinclair, A. (2016). The intellectual base of archaeological research 2004–2013. Internet Archaeology 42: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue42/8/index.html.
  232. Sindbæk, S. M. (2007). The small world of the Vikings: Networks in early medieval communication and exchange. Norwegian Archaeological Review 40: 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Sindbæk, S. M. (2013). Broken links and black boxes: Material affiliations and contextual network synthesis in the Viking world. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. Sindbæk, S. M. (2015). Northern emporia and maritime networks: Modelling past communication using archaeological network analysis. In Preiser-Kapeller, J., and Daim, F. (eds.), Harbours and Maritime Networks as Complex Aadptive Systems, Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, Mainz, Germany, pp. 105–118.Google Scholar
  235. Smith, M. E., Feinman, G. M., Drennan, R. D., Earle, T., and Morris, I. (2012). Archaeology as a social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109: 7617–7621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Snijders, T. A. (2011). Network dynamics. In Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, pp. 501–513.Google Scholar
  237. Stark, M. T. (2003). Current issues in ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 11: 193–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature 410: 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. Suitor, J. J., Wellman, B., and Morgan, D. L. (1997). It’s about time: How, why, and when networks change. Social Networks 19: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Swanson, S. (2003). Documenting prehistoric communication networks: A case study in the Paquimé polity. American antiquity 68: 753–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. Swantek, L. A. (2017). A Change Is Going to Come: A Complex Systems Approach to the Emergence of Social Complexity on Cyprus, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
  242. Terrell, J. E. (1976). Island biogeography and man in Melanesia. Archaeology and physical anthropology in Oceania 11: 1–17.Google Scholar
  243. Terrell, J. E. (1977a). Geographic systems and human diversity in the North Solomons. World Archaeology 9: 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Terrell, J. E. (1977b). Human biogeography in the Solomon Islands. Fieldiana Anthropology 68: 1–47.Google Scholar
  245. Terrell, J. E. (2010a). Language and material culture on the Sepik Coast of Papua New Guinea: Using social network analysis to simulate, graph, identify, and analyze social and cultural boundaries between communities. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 5: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. Terrell, J. E. (2010b). Social network analysis of the genetic structure of Pacific islanders. Annals of Human Genetics 74: 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. Terrell, J. E. (2013). Social network analysis and the practice of history. In Knappett, C. (ed.), Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
  248. Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  249. Torres, J. M. (2012). The Social Construction of Community, Polity, and Place in Ancient Puerto Rico, AD 600–AD 1200, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  250. Travers, J., and Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32: 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. Tsirogiannis, C., and Tsirogiannis, C. (2016). Uncovering the hidden routes: Algorithms for identifying paths and missing links in trade networks. In Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
  252. Van der Leeuw, S. (1993). Giving the potter a choice. In Lemonnier, P. (ed.), Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Culture since the Neolithic, Routledge, New York, pp. 238–288.Google Scholar
  253. Van Dyke, R. M., Bocinsky, R. K., Windes, T. C., and Robinson, T. J. (2016). Great houses, shrines, and high places: Intervisibility in the Chacoan world. American Antiquity 81: 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Van Oyen, A. (2016a). Networks or work-nets? Actor-network theory and multiple social topologies in the production of Roman Terra Sigillata. In Brughmans, T., Collar, A., and Coward, F. (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
  255. Van Oyen, A. (2016b). Historicising material agency: From relations to relational constellations. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23: 354–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. Verhagen, P., Brughmans, T., Nuninger, L., and Bertoncello, F. (2013). The long and winding road: Combining least cost paths and network analysis techniques for settlement location analysis and predictive modelling. Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Techniques in Archaeology Conference 2012, Southampton, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 357–366.Google Scholar
  257. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambdige.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. Watts, D. J. (2004a). The “new” science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. Watts, D. J. (2004b). Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age, W. W. Norton and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  260. Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Watts, J. (2013). Traces of the individual in prehistory: Flintknappers and the distribution of projectile points in the eastern Tonto Basin, Arizona. Advances in Archaeological Practice 1: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. Watts, J., and Ossa, A. (2016). Exchange network topologies and agent-based modeling: Economies of the Sedentary-period Hohokam. American Antiquity 81: 623–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Weidele, D., van Garderen, M., Golitko, M., Feinman, G. M., and Brandes, U. (2016). On graphical representations of similarity in geo-temporal frequency data. Journal of Archaeological Science 72: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. Weng, L., Menczer, F., and Ahn, Y.-Y. (2013). Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific Reports 3: 2522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  266. Wernke, S. A. (2012). Spatial network analysis of a terminal prehispanic and early colonial settlement in highland Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 1111–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Wheatley, D., and Gillings, M. (2002). Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The Archaeological Applications of GIS, Taylor and Francis, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. White, D. A., and Barber, S. B. (2012). Geospatial modeling of pedestrian transportation networks: A case study from precolumbian Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 2684–2696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. White, H. C. (1992). Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  270. White, H. C. (2008). Notes on the constituents of social structure. Sociological 1/2008: http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/doi/10.2383/26576.
  271. Wiessner, P. (1997). Seeking guidelines through an evolutionary approach: Style revisited among the !Kung San of the 1990s. In Barton, C. M., and Clark, G. A. (eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archaeological Explanation, Archeological Papers No. 7, American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 157–176.Google Scholar
  272. Wissink, M., and Mazzucato, V. (2017). In transit: Changing social networks of sub-Saharan African migrants in Turkey and Greece. Social Networks 53: 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. Wolf, E. R. (1982). Europe and the People Without History, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bibliography of Recent Literature

  1. Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., and Christakis, N. A. (2012). Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481: 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apolinaire, E., and Bastourre, L. (2016). Nets and canoes: A network approach to the pre-Hispanic settlement system in the Upper Delta of the Paraná River (Argentina). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 44: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, S. P., Coutu, A., and Sindbæk, S. M. (2015). Urban networks and Arctic outlands: Craft specialists and reindeer antler in Viking towns. European Journal of Archaeology 18: 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubry, T., Luís, L., Mangado Llach, J., and Matias, H. (2012). We will be known by the tracks we leave behind: Exotic lithic raw materials, mobility and social networking among the Côa Valley foragers (Portugal). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31: 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthelemy, M. (2014). Discussion: Social and spatial networks. Nouvelles de l’Archéologie 135: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernabeu Aubán, J., Lozano, S., and Pardo-Gordó, S. (2017). Iberian Neolithic networks: The rise and fall of the Cardial world. Frontiers in the Digital Humanities. 4: e00007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordoni, L. (2015). Social network analysis for sharing and understanding archaeology. In Barcelo, J., and Bogdanovic, I. (eds.), Mathematics and Archaeology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, B., Hamilton, M. J., Kilby, J. D., and Gingerich, J. A. M. (2016). Lithic networks reveal early regionalization in late Pleistocene North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 65: 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn, H. (2014). Population genetics and the investigation of past human interactions. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 42–66.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, S., and Felder, K. (2014). Making the connection: Changing perspectives on social networks. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 9–17.Google Scholar
  11. Feugnet, A., Filet, C., and Rossi, F. (2017). Co-presence analysis and economic patterns: Mediterranean imports in the Celtic World. Frontiers in the Digital Humanities 4: e00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filet, C. (2016). An attempt to estimate the impact of the spread of economic flows on Latenian urbanization. Frontiers in the Digital Humanities 3: e00010.Google Scholar
  13. Froese, T., Gershenson, C., and Manzanilla, L. R. (2014). Can government be self-organized? A mathematical model of the collective social organization of ancient Teotihuacan, central Mexico. PloS One 9: e109966–e109966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulminante, F. (2014). The network approach: Tool or paradigm? Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 167–178.Google Scholar
  15. Golitko, M., and Terrell, J. E. (2012). Mapping prehistoric social fields on the Sepik coast of Papua New Guinea: Ceramic compositional analysis using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3568–3580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, S. (2014). On connecting stamps: Network analysis and epigraphy. Nouvelles de l’Archéologie 135: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harding, A. (2013). World systems, cores, and peripheries in prehistoric Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 16: 378-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hauser, M. W. (2015). The infrastructure of nature’s island: Settlements, networks and economy of two plantations in colonial Dominica. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 601-622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofman, C., Mol, A., Hoogland, M., and Valcárcel Rojas, R. (2014). Stage of encounters: Migration, mobility and interaction in the pre-colonial and early colonial Caribbean. World Archaeology 46: 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ibañez, J. J., Ortega, D., Campos, D., Khalidi, L., Méndez, V., and Teira, L. (2016). Developing a complex network model of obsidian exchange in the Neolithic Near East: Linear regressions, ethnographic models and archaeological data. Paléorient 42: 9–32.Google Scholar
  21. Kerig, T., and Shennan, S. (eds.) (2015). Connecting Networks: Characterising Contact by Measuring Lithic Exchange in the European Neolithic, Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Leidwanger, J. (2014). Maritime networks and economic regionalism in the Roman eastern Mediterranean. Nouvelles de l’Archéologie 135: 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martín, A. J., and Murillo Herrera, M. (2014). Networks of interaction and functional interdependence in societies across the Intermediate Area. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 36: 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meissner, N. J. (2017). A social network analysis of the Postclassic lowland Maya obsidian projectile industry. Ancient Mesoamerica 28: 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mills, B. J. (2015). Unpacking the house: Ritual practice and social networks at Chaco. In Heitman, C. C., and Plog, S. (eds.), Chaco Revisited: New Research on the Prehistory of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 249–271.Google Scholar
  26. Mol, A. (2014). Play-things and the origins of online networks: Virtual material culture in multiplayer games. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 144–166.Google Scholar
  27. Müller, U. (2012). Networks of towns: Networks of periphery? Some relations between the north European Medieval town and its hinterland. In Brather, S., Müller, U., and Steuer, H. (eds.), Raumbildung Durch Netzwerke? Der Ostseeraum Zwischen Wikingerzeit un Spaetmittelalter aus Archaeologischer und Geschichtswissenschaftlicher Perspektive, Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn, pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
  28. Nazaroff, A. J., Baysal, A., Çiftçi, Y., and Prufer, K. (2015). Resilience and redundance: Resource networks and the Neolithic chert economy at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. European Journal of Archaeology 18: 402–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson, E. S., and Kassabaum, M. C. (2014). Expanding social networks through ritual deposition: A case study from the Lower Mississippi Valley. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 103–128.Google Scholar
  30. Ortega, D., Ibañez, J. J., Khalidi, L., Méndez, V., Campos, D., and Teira, L. (2014). Towards a multi-agent-based modelling of obsidian exchange in the Neolithic Near East. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21: 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Östborn, P., and Gerding, H. (2015). The diffusion of fired bricks in Hellenistic Europe: A similarity network analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22: 306–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pearce, E. (2014). Modelling mechanisms of social network maintenance in hunter-gatherers. Journal of Archaeological Science 50: 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Preiser-Kapeller, J. (2015). Calculating the Middle Ages? The project ”Complexities and networks in the Medieval Mediterranean and Near East.” Medieval Worlds 2: 100–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riede, F. (2014). Eruptions and ruptures: A social network perspective on vulnerability and impact of the Laacher See eruption (c. 13,000 BP) on late glacial hunter-gatherers in northern Europe. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 67–102.Google Scholar
  35. Schortman, E. M. (2014). Networks of power in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seland, E. H. (2015). Writ in water, lines in sand: Ancient trade routes, models and comparative evidence. Cogent Arts and Humanities 2: 1110272–1110272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sosna, D., Galeta, P., Šmejda, L., Sladek, V., and Bruzek, J. (2013). Burials and graphs: Relational approach to mortuary analysis. Social Science Computer Review 31: 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stoner, J. (2014). ‘Extending the self’ through material culture: Private letters and personal relationships in second-century AD Egypt. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 129–143.Google Scholar
  39. Suchowska-Ducke, P. (2015). The dissemination of Naue II swords: A case study on long-distance mobility. In Suchowska-Ducke, P., Reiter, S. S., and Vandkilde, H. (eds.), Forging Identities. The Mobility of Culture in Bronze Age Europe: Volume 2, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 257–265.Google Scholar
  40. Van Oyen, A. (2014). Les acteurs-réseaux en archéologie: État de la question et perspectives futures. Nouvelles de l’Archéologie 135: 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verlaan, T. (2013). Changing seascapes: The Aegean seascape from the Stone Age to the Bronze Age. In Raemaekers, D. C. (ed.), A Kaleidoscope of Maritime Perspectives: Essays on the Archaeology, Art History and Landscape History of the Maritime World View, Groningen Institute of Archaeology/Barkhuis Publishing, Groningen, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
  42. White, A. (2012). An abstract model showing that the spatial structure of social networks affects the outcomes of cultural transmission processes. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 16: 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations