Advertisement

Journal of Applied Spectroscopy

, Volume 86, Issue 5, pp 802–805 | Cite as

Diagnostics of Systematic Errors During Single-Photon Detector Operation

  • P. I. NovikEmail author
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Methods for detecting and recovering drift of parameters in random samples were investigated and applied to model problems and real experimental data with drift. The drift of the experimental data was recovered. The time dependence of the probability of detector failure with and without drift was obtained.

Keywords

quantum optics quantum tomography systematic errors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Ya. Kilin, D. B. Khoroshko, and A. P. Nizovtsev, Quantum Cryptography: Ideas and Practice [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Nature, 464, 45–53 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. H. Shih, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 13, 1016–1030 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Zhang, W. Gong, X. Shen, D. Huang, and S. Han, Opt. Lett., 34, 1222–1224 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X.-H. Chen, I. N. Agafonov, K.-H. Luo, Q. Lui, R. Xian, M. V. Chekhova, and L.-A. Wu, Opt. Lett., 35, No. 8, 1166–1168 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature, 299, 802–803 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. S. Teo, Introduction to Quantum-State Estimation, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Paris and J. Rehacek (Eds.), Quantum State Estimation, Lecture Notes in Physics, 649, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg (2004).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Hradil, D. Mogilevtsev, and J. Rehacek, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, No. 23, 230401 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Mogilevtsev, J. Rehacek, and Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys., 75, No. 1, 012112 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. S. Teo, H. Zhu, B.-G. Englert, J. Rehacek, and Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 020404 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Mogilevtsev, Z. Hradil, J. Rehacek, and V. S. Shchesnovich, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 120403 (2013).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. E. Huang, Zheng Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N.-C. Yen, C. C. Tung, and H. H. Liu, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 454. 903–995 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Tiedau, J. V. S. Shchesnovich, D. Mogilevtsev, V. Ansari, G. Harder, T. J. Bartley, N. Korolkova, and C. Silberhorn, New J. Phys., 20, 033003 (2018).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Rehacek, D. Mogilevtsev, and Z. Hradil, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, No. 1, 010402 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Mogilevtsev, A. Ignatenko, A. Maloshtan, B. Stoklasa, J. Rehacek, and Z. Hradil, New J. Phys., 15, No. 2, 025038 (2013).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.B. I. Stepanov Institute of PhysicsNational Academy of Sciences of BelarusMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations