Advertisement

The problem of naming commercial seaweeds

  • John J. BoltonEmail author
Seaweed For Health Conference, Galway

Abstract

Although there are different naming systems for economic seaweeds, including local vernacular, legal, and institutional names, there is a general understanding that naming systems are underpinned by correct scientific taxonomy and nomenclature. The molecular revolution in taxonomy, causing huge changes in delimitation of taxa, together with a perceived inability of scientific taxonomy and nomenclature to keep up with these changes is a major problem. For example, it is suggested that the majority of marine natural products from seaweeds are described in the scientific literature linked to taxonomically incorrect names. The different naming systems are here described and compared, with examples showing mismatches between up-to-date scientific taxonomy, nomenclature, and current commercial and legal naming practices. It is considered feasible that a consensus will soon be reached on taxonomic systems for commercially important groups, and scientific names of taxa updated to incorporate this new information. It is essential that names from other nomenclatural systems be increasingly underpinned by scientific, evolutionarily-based taxonomy. The critical communication role played by the website Algaebase.org as a highly reliable and up-to-date source of nomenclatural information is highlighted, as is the need for naming of material with commercial potential to be backed up by DNA barcoding in the future, once the taxonomy of economically important groups has been thoroughly investigated.

Keywords

Nomenclature Marine natural products Legal Marine algae Taxonomy Industry Barcoding 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This contribution was funded by National Research Foundation grant number: 111719.

Many thanks to the organizers of the inaugural Seaweeds for Health conference in Galway, Ireland, for inviting me to present a Keynote address and allowing me to indulge my interest in names.

References

  1. Anderson RJ, Bolton JJ, Molloy FJ, Rotmann KWG (2003) Commercial seaweed production and research in southern Africa. In: Chapman ARO, Anderson RJ, Vreeland VJ, Davison IR (eds) Proc. 17th Int. Seaweed Symp. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  2. Bennett S, Wernberg T, Connell SD, Hobday AJ, Johnson CR, Poloczanska ES (2015) The ‘Great Southern Reef’: social, ecological and economic value of Australia’s neglected kelp forests. Mar Freshw Res 67:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolton JJ (2016) What is aquatic botany? - and why algae are plants: the importance of non-taxonomic terms for groups of organisms. Aqat Bot 132:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolton JJ, Cyrus MD, Brand MJ, Joubert M, Macey BM (2016) Why grow Ulva? Its potential in the future of seaweed aquaculture. Perspect Phycol 3:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branch GM, Griffiths CL. Branch ML, Beckley LE (1994) Two Oceans: A guide to the marine life of southern Africa, 1st edition. Struik Nature, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell R, Hotchkiss S (2017) Carrageenan industry market overview. In: Hurtado A, Critchley A, Neish I (eds) Tropical Seaweed Farming Trends, Problems and Opportunities. Developments in Applied Phycology, vol 9. Springer, Cham, pp 193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chopin T (2018) Seaweeds: the world’s largest mariculture crop. Int Aquafeed 2018:14–15Google Scholar
  8. De Clerck O, Guiry MD, Leliaert F, Samyn Y, Verbruggen H (2013) Algal taxonomy: a road to nowhere? J Phycol 49:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO (2018a) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2018b) The global status of seaweed production, trade and utilization. In: Globefish Research Programme, vol 124. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernández-Arnesto F (2001) Truth: A history and guide for the perplexed. St. Martin’s Griffin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Francis C, Bolton JJ, Mattio L, Mandiwana-Neudani TG, Anderson RJ (2017) Molecular systematics reveals increased diversity within the South African Laurencia complex (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). J Phycol 53:804–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser CI (2012) Is bull-kelp kelp? The role of common names in science. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 46:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredericq S, Hommersand MH (1989) Comparative morphology and taxonomic status of Gracilariopsis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). J Phycol 25:228–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujii MT, Guimaraes SMPB, Gurgel CFD, Fredericq S (2006) Characterization and phylogenetic affinities of the red alga Chondrophycus flagelliferus (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales) from Brazil on the basis of morphological and molecular evidence. Phycologia 45:432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garnett ST, Christidis L (2017) Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation. Nature 546:25–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray JN (2002) Straw dogs: thoughts on humans and other animals. Granta BooksGoogle Scholar
  18. Guiry MD, Guiry GM (2019) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 21 June 2019Google Scholar
  19. Hollingsworth PM, Watson M, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Miller S, Hebert PDN (2017) Taxonomy: avoid extra bureaucracy. Nature 546:600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hommersand MH, Fredericq S (2003) Biogeography of the marine red algae of the South African West Coast: a molecular approach. In: ARO C, Anderson RJ, Vreeland VJ, Davison IR (eds) Proc. 17th Int Seaweed Symp. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 325–336Google Scholar
  21. Hughey JR, Maggs CA, Mineur F, Jarvis C, Miller KA, Shabaka SH, Gabrielson PW (2019) Genetic analysis of the Linnaean Ulva lactuca (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) holotype and related type specimens reveals name misapplications, unexpected origins, and new synonymies. J Phycol 53:505–508Google Scholar
  22. Krumhansl KA, Okamoto DK, Rassweiler A, Novak M, Bolton JJ, Cavanaugh KC, Connell SD, Johnson CR, Konar B, Ling SD, Micheli F, Norderhaug K, Pérez-Matus A, Sousa-Pinto I, Reed D, Salomon AK, Shears NT, Wernberg T, Anderson RJ, Barrett N, Buschmann AH, Carr MH, Caselle JE, Derrien-Courtel S, Edgar GJ, Edwards MS, Estes J, Goodwin C, Kenner MC, Kushner DJ, Moy FE, Nunn J, Steneck R, Vásquez J, Watson J, Witman J, Byrnes JEK (2016) Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:13785–13790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lane CE, Mayes C, Druehl LD, Saunders GW (2006) A multi-gene molecular investigation of the kelp (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) supports substantial taxonomic re-organization. J Phycol 42:493–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leal MC, Murray HG, Munro JW, Blunt JW, Puga J, Jesus B, Calado R, Rosag R, Madeirag C (2013) Biogeography and biodiscovery hotspots of macroalgal marine natural products. Nat Prod Rep 30:1380–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leliaert F, Payo DA, Gurgel CFD, Schils T, Draisma SGA, Saunders GW, Kamiya M, Sherwood AR, Lin S-M, Huisman JM, Le Gall L, Anderson RJ, Bolton JJ, Mattio L, Zubia M, Spokes T, Vieira C, Payri CE, Coppejans E, D'hondt S, Verbruggen H, De Clerck O (2018) Patterns and drivers of species diversity in the Indo-Pacific red seaweed Portieria. J Biogeogr 45:2299–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopes-Filho EAP, Salgueiro F, Nascimento SM, Gauna MC, Parodi ER, De Paula JC (2017) Molecular evidence of the presence of Dictyota dichotoma (Dictyotales: Phaeophyceae) in Argentina based on sequences from mtDNA and cpDNA and a discussion of its possible origin. N Z J Bot 55:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. McIvor L, Maggs CA, Stanhope MJ (2002) RbcL sequences indicate a single evolutionary origin of multinucleate cells in the red algal tribe Callithamnieae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mouritsen OG (2017) Those tasty weeds. J Appl Phycol 29:2159–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neiva J, Bárbara I, Tamigneaux É, Gouveia L, Aires T, Marbà N, Bruhn A, Pearson GA, Serrão EA (2018) Glacial vicariance drives phylogeographic diversification in the amphi-boreal kelp Saccharina latissima. Sci Rep 8:1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryther JH, De Busk TA, Blakeslee M (1984) Cultivation and conversion of marine macroalgae. Final subcontract report. Solar Energy Research Institute, US Department of Energy, SERI/STR-231-2360Google Scholar
  32. Santelices B, Doty MS (1989) A review of Gracilaria farming. Aquaculture 78:95–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saunders GW, Lehmkuhl KV (2005) Molecular divergence and morphological diversity among four cryptic species of Plocamium (Plocamiales, Florideophyceae) in northern Europe. Eur J Phycol 40:293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Starko S, Martone P (2016) Evidence of an evolutionary-developmental trade-off between drag avoidance and tolerance strategies in wave-swept intertidal kelps (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae). J Phycol 52:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Starko S, Boo GH, Martone PT, Lindstrom SC (2018) A molecular investigation of Saccharina sessilis from the Aleutian Islands reveals a species complex, necessitating the new combination Saccharina subsessilis. Algae 33:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Starko S, Soto Gomez M, Darby H, Demes KW, Kawai H, Yotsukura N, Lindstrom SC, Keeling PJ, Graham SW, Martone PT (2019) A comprehensive kelp phylogeny sheds light on the evolution of an ecosystem. Mol Phylogenet Evol 136:138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutherland JE, Lindstrom SC, Nelson WA, Brodie J, Lynch MDJ, Hwang MS, Choi H-G, Miyata M, Kikuchi N, Oliviera MC, Farr TJ, Neefus CD, Mols-Mortensen A, Milstein D, Müller KM (2011) A new look at an ancient order: generic revision of the Bangiales (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 47:1131–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tronholm A, Steen F, Tyberghein L, Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, Antonia Ribera Siguan M, De Clerck O (2001) Species delimitation, taxonomy, and biogeography of Dictyota in Europe (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae). J Phycol 46:1301–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vonshak A, Tomaselli L (2000) Arthrospira (Spirulina): systematics and ecophysiology. In: Whitton BA, Potts M (eds) Ecology of Cyanobacteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 505–523Google Scholar
  40. Wakibia JG, Anderson RJ, Keats DW (2001) Growth rates and agar properties of three gracilarioids in suspended open-water cultivation in St. Helena Bay, South Africa. J Appl Phycol 13:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wernberg T, Filbee-Dexter K (2019) Missing the marine forest for the trees. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 612:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang J, Liu T, Rui F (2018) Development of EST-SSR markers derived from transcriptome of Saccharina japonica and their application in genetic diversity analysis. J Appl Phycol 30:2101–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations