Advertisement

Just Fanciers: Transformative Justice by Way of Fancy Rat Breeding as a Loving Form of Life

  • Julia D. Gibson
Articles

Abstract

A growing trend within feminist animal studies is to eschew the abolitionism/welfarism binary in favor of attending carefully to the politics of existing interspecies relationships in context. This literature maintains that domestication produces special interspecies relationships which generate ongoing responsibilities for human companions and communities. With the goal of clarifying how tending to these ongoing responsibilities to domesticated animals can qualify as enduring forms of interspecies justice, this paper unpacks the politics of these special relationships and obligations in context, specifically, that of fancy rat breeders’ attempts to eliminate aganglionic megacolon. Contrasting fanciers’ efforts with those of laboratory breeders and researchers, I argue that what sets the fancy apart is its shared code of ethics and the loving, principled form of life from which it emerges. Furthermore, the knowledge that rats are worth loving not only enables fanciers to attend to the injustice of megacolon but facilitates transformative justice for domestic rats more broadly.

Keywords

Animal ethics Feminist animal studies Love studies Animal experimentation Transformative justice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Paul Thompson, Kyle Whyte, and Zachary Piso for their help and support throughout the development of this project. I would also like to thank the Geocognition Research Laboratory at Michigan State University and Lynn Keller for their invaluable insights.

References

  1. AAALAC International. (2015). Accreditation. AAALAC.org. http://www.aaalac.org/accreditation/index.cfm. Accessed June 3, 2018.
  2. American Fancy Rat and Mouse Association (AFRMA). (2014). AFRMA breeding rats & mice: Care and guidelines. AFRMA.org. http://www.afrma.org/sales/contentsbreed.htm. Accessed April 10, 2018.
  3. Anzaldua, Gloria (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul/Haciend caras: Creative and Critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
  4. Association of Colorado Rat Enthusiasts. (2006). ACRE code of ethics. http://coloradoratenthusiasts.org/code-of-ethics. Accessed May 4, 2018.
  5. Birke, L. (1997). Science and animals—Or, why Cyril won’t win the Nobel Prize. Animal Issues, 1(1), 45–55.Google Scholar
  6. Boesten, J., & Wilding, P. (2015). Transformative gender justice: Setting an agenda. Women’s Studies International Forum, 51, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, C. (2002). Megacecum and megacolon: Development disorders in the enteric nervous system in rats. AFRMA Rat and Mouse Tales. http://www.afrma.org/megacecum.htm. Accessed June 9, 2018.
  8. Cassell, G., Clyde, W., Jr., & Davis, J. (1985). Mycoplasmal respiratory infections. In S. Razin & M. Barile (Eds.), The mycoplasmas (Vol. IV)., Mycoplasma pathogenicity Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Churchland, P. (2011). Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Confessions of a Rat Breeder. (2013). “High white markings” what does it really mean? http://bwr-rats.blogspot.com/2013/09/high-white-markings-what-does-it-really.html. Accessed November 12, 2014.
  11. Curiosity Rats. (2013a). Breeding information. Curiosity Rats. http://www.curiousv.com/curiosityrats/files/infobreed.html. Accessed May 2, 2018.
  12. Curiosity Rats. (2013b). Genetics: White markings. Curiosity Rats. http://www.curiousv.com/curiosityrats/files/geneticsmarkings.html. Accessed May 2, 2018.
  13. Dang, R., Torigoe, D., Sasaki, N., & Agui, T. (2011). QTL analysis identifies a modifier locus of aganglionosis in the rat model of Hirschsprung disease carrying Ednrb(sl) mutations. Public Library of Science One, 6(11), e27902.Google Scholar
  14. DeStefano, S. (2010). Coyote at the kitchen door: Living with wildlife in suburbia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Donovan, J., & Adams, C. (Eds.). (2007). The feminist care tradition in animal ethics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ferguson, A., & Toye, M. E. (2017). Feminist Love Studies—Editors’ Introduction. Hypatia, 32(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francione, G. (2009). Animals as persons: Essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gariepy, C., Williams, S., Richardson, J., Hammer, R., & Yanagisawa, M. (1998). Transgenic expression of the endothelin-B receptor prevents congenital intestinal aganglionosis in a rat model of Hirschsprung disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 102(6), 1092–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregoratto, F. (2017). Why love kills: Power, gender dichotomy, and romantic femicide. Hypatia, 32(1), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, D. (2003). For the love of a good dog: Webs of action in the world of dog genetics. In A. Goodman, D. Heath, & M. Lindee (Eds.), Genetic nature/culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harvey, J. (2008). Companion and assistance animals: Benefits, welfare safeguards, and relationships. In Christine Overall (Ed.), Pets and people: The ethics of our relationships with companion animals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hedrich, H. (2000). History, strains and models. In G. Krinke (Ed.), The laboratory rat. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Herbath, B., Pingault, V., Bondurand, N., Kuhlbrodt, K., Hermans-Borgmeyer, I., Puliti, A., et al. (1998). Mutation of the sry-related Sox10 gene in dominant megacolon, a mouse model for human Hirschsprung disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(9), 5161–5165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hilscher-Conklin, C. (1996). Rattus biologicus: The domestication of the rat. Rat & Mouse Gazette July/August. http://www.rmca.org/Articles/domestication.htm. Accessed April 18, 2018.
  28. Isaksen, M. (1999). The rat fan club breeding: Can YOU live with it? http://www.ratfanclub.org/breeding.html. Accessed June 2, 2018.
  29. LaDuke, Winona. (1999). All our relations: Native struggle for land and life. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  30. Lorde, Audre. (1984). Sister outsider. NY, NY: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
  31. MacMahon, M. (2014). Transformative feminisms: Expanding feminist strategies for living in troubled times. Canadian Women’s Studies, 31, 27–32.Google Scholar
  32. O’Connor, T. (2013). Animals as neighbors: The past and present of commensal species. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ontario Rattery Club. (n.d.). Code of ethics. OntarioRatterClub.com. http://www.ontarioratteryclub.com/code-of-ethics.html. Accessed December 4, 2014).
  34. Overall, C. (Ed.). (2017). Pets and people: The ethics of our relationships with companion animals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Palmer, C. (2006). Killing animals in animal shelters. In C. Palmer (Ed.), Killing animals. Champaign, IL: The Animal Studies Group, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, C. (2010). Animal ethics in context. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Quenqua, D. (2014). For lab rats, a ‘male scientist’ effect. The New York Times, April 28.Google Scholar
  39. Rat Health Guide. (2013). Megacolon. RatHealthGuide.com. http://ratguide.com/health/digestive/megacolon.php. Accessed May 22, 2018.
  40. Rogers, F. (2003). The world according to Mister Rogers: Important things to remember. New York, NY: Hyperion Books.Google Scholar
  41. Royer, N. (2000). Breeding—beyond the basics: Ethics. American Fancy Rat and Mouse Association. http://www.afrma.org/breeding-ethics.htm. Accessed June 6, 2018.
  42. Royer, N. (2015a). The history of fancy rats. American Fancy Rat and Mouse Association. http://www.afrma.org/historyrat.htm. Accessed June 6, 2018.
  43. Royer, N. (2015b). A responsible breeder’s code of ethics. American Fancy Rat and Mouse Association. http://www.afrma.org/breedethics.htm. Accessed June 6, 2018.
  44. Rudy, K. (2013). Loving animals: Toward a new animal advocacy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, D. (2002). Rats, mice and birds excluded from Animal Welfare Act. Monitor on Psychology, 33(7), 14.Google Scholar
  46. Stolzenburg, W. (2008). Where the wild things were: Life, death, and ecological wreckage in a land of vanishing predators. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  47. The Advocacy of Veganism Society. (2018). Mission. http://www.abolitionistvegansociety.org/about/mission/#.Wyfw1KdKjIU. Accessed May 18, 2018.
  48. The Great Lakes Fancy Rat Association. (n.d.). GLFRA code of ethics. GLFRA.com. http://www.glfra.com/GLFRACodeofEthics.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2014.
  49. Topi Rats. (2014). My breeding code of ethics. TopiRats.com. http://www.topirats.com/codeofethics.htm. Accessed April 20, 2018.
  50. Tsai, Y., Murakami, N., & Gariepy, C. (2011). Postnatal intestinal engraftment of prospectively selected enteric neural crest stem cells in a rat model of Hirschsprung disease. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 23(4), 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ureña, C. (2017). Loving from below: Of (De)colonial love and other demons. Hypatia, 32(1), 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker, M. U. (2015). Transformative reparations? A critical look at a current trend in thinking about gender-just reparations. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10, 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber, E. (2015). Vulnerability, dependence, and special obligations to domesticated animals: A reply to Palmer. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28, 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whyte, K. P., & Cuomo, C. (2016). Ethics of caring in environmental ethics: Indigenous and feminist philosophies. In S. M. Gardiner & A. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics (pp. 234–237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (Trans: Anscombe, G.E.M.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations