Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course
- 3 Downloads
This project assesses the ability of a game tutorial, “Goblin Threat” to increase university students’ ability to recognize plagiarized passages. The game tutorial covers information about how to cite properly, types and consequences of plagiarism, and the differences between paraphrasing and plagiarism. The game involves finding and clicking on “goblins” who ask questions about various aspects of plagiarism. Sound effects and entertaining visuals work to keep students’ attention. One group of 177 students enrolled in an online Psychology of Adolescence course answered four multiple choice plagiarism recognition questions in the months after completing the online game tutorial while another group of over 400 students in the same online psychology course did not have access to the game tutorial, but answered the same multiple choice plagiarism recognition questions over the same period of time. The group who played the game tutorial showed an 11% improvement in recognizing plagiarized passages over the comparison group, a statistically significant difference. Results suggest the ability to keep students focused may be an important ingredient for plagiarism interventions.
KeywordsAccidental plagiarism Plagiarism intervention Online education Distance education
Thanks go to Mary Broussard for creating “Goblin Threat” and allowing me to use it for my courses and research. I would also like to thank Lara Apps and Adrienne Munro for their research assistance. This project was partially supported by two research grants from the Academic Research Committee of my university. I would also like to thank Andrew Chiarella and Cheuk Ng for reviewing earlier versions of this manuscript.
- Arnett, J.J. (2007). Adolescence and emerging adulthood, third edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bradley, E. G. (2015). Using computer simulations and games to prevent student plagiarism. Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 240–252.Google Scholar
- Broussard, M. J. S. (2011). Goblin threat. In T. R. McDevitt (Ed.), Let the games begin! Engaging students with field-tested interactive information literacy instruction (pp. 132–133). New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc..Google Scholar
- Broussard, M. J. S. (2012). Digital games in academic libraries: A review of games and suggested best practices. Reference Services Review, 40(1), 75–89.Google Scholar
- Broussard, M. J. S. (2014). Using games to make formative assessment fun in the academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 35–42.Google Scholar
- Broussard, M. J. S. & Oberlin, J. U. (2011). Using online games to fight plagiarism: A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down. Indiana Libraries, 30(1), 28–39. Available at http://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/IndianaLibraries/article/view/1912/1823. Accessed 4 May 2014.
- Brown, C. A., Dickson, R., Humphreys, A.-L., McQuillan, V., & Smears, E. (2008). Promoting academic writing/referencing skills: Outcome of an undergraduate e-learning pilot project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00735.x.Google Scholar
- Chandrasoma, R., Thompson, C., & Pennycook, A. (2004). Beyond plagiarism: Transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3(3), 171–193.Google Scholar
- Chankova, M. (2017) Dealing with students’ plagiarism pre-emptively through teaching proper information exploitation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11 (2), Article 4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110204.
- Chertok, I. R. A., Barnes, E., & Gilleland, D. (2014). Academic integrity in the online learning environment for health sciences students. Nurse Education Today, 34(10), 1324–1329.Google Scholar
- Coffey, S., & Anyinam, C. (2012). Trialing a contextual approach to academic honesty. Nurse Educator., 37(2), 62–66.Google Scholar
- Colella-Sandercock, J. (2016). Self-reporting in plagiarism research: How honest is this approach? Journal of Research Practice, 12(2), Article V3. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/558/456. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
- Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59, 661–686.Google Scholar
- Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 615–622.Google Scholar
- Elander, J., Pittamb, G., Lusherc, J., Fox, P., & Paynee, N. (2010). Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 157–171.Google Scholar
- Estow, S., Lawrence, E. K., & Adams, K. A. (2011). Practice makes perfect: Improving students' skills in understanding and avoiding plagiarism with a themed course. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 255–258.Google Scholar
- Germek, G. (2012). The lack of assessment in the academic library plagiarism prevention tutorial. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, M., Walkem, K., Smith, L. M., Shearer, T., & Stirling, C. (2014). Postgraduate nursing student knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence in appropriately referencing academic work. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(8), 447–452.Google Scholar
- Heckler, N. C., Forde, D. R., & Hobson Bryan, C. (2013). Using writing assignment designs to mitigate plagiarism. Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 94–105.Google Scholar
- Holt, E. A. (2012). Education improves plagiarism detection by biology undergraduates. BioScience, 62(6), 585–592.Google Scholar
- Ison, D. C. (2014). Does the online environment promote plagiarism? A comparative study of dissertations from brick-and-mortar versus online institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 272–281.Google Scholar
- Jamieson, S. (2013). What students’ use of sources reveals about advanced writing skills. Across the Disciplines, 10(4). Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/jamieson.cfm. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
- Jocoy, C., & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners online: A case study in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., Raghuraman, R., Thomas, J., & Davis, S. F. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309–314.Google Scholar
- Lamoreaux, M., Darnell, K., Sheehan, E., & Tusher, C. (2012). Educating students about plagiarism. Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Marusic, A., Wager, E., Utrobicic, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Sambunjak, D. (2016). Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (Issue 4), Art. No.: MR000038. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
- McCabe, D. L. (2009). Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: An empirical investigation. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 614–623.Google Scholar
- McGowan, S., & Lightbody, M. (2008). Enhancing students’ understanding of plagiarism within a discipline context. Accounting Education, 17(3), 273–290.Google Scholar
- McKay, T. M. (2014). Combating plagiarism using a community of practice approach. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(4), 1315–1331.Google Scholar
- McLeod, S. (2013). Stages of memory - Encoding storage and retrieval. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/memory.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
- Moss, S. A., White, B., & Lee, J. (2017). A systematic review into the psychological causes and correlates of plagiarism, Ethics & Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837. Published online: 16 Jun 2017.
- Owens, C., & White, F. A. (2013). A 5-year systematic strategy to reduce plagiarism among first-year psychology university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
- Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 153–170.Google Scholar
- Rohlen, T. P. (1983). Japan’s high schools. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Smedley, A., Crawford, T., & Cloete, L. (2015). An intervention aimed at reducing plagiarism in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 15, 168–173.Google Scholar
- Snyder, L. G., & Cannoy, S. D. (2010). Business communication: Instructional strategies to prevent plagiarism, Business Education Forum, 23–25.Google Scholar
- Stetter, M. E. (2013). Teaching students about plagiarism using a web-based module. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(5), 675–693.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, H. W. & Zucho, A. (2002). Adolescence in China and Japan: Adapting to a changing environment. In B. B. Brown, R. Larson, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.) The world's youth: Adolescence in eight regions of the globe (pp. 141–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Stuber-McEwen, D., Wiseley, P., & Hoggatt, S. (2009). Point, click, and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in the virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XII(III). Google Scholar
- Tewell, E., & Angell, K. (2015). Far from a trivial pursuit: Assessing the effectiveness of games in information literacy instruction. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(1), 20–33.Google Scholar
- Turnitin (2012). White paper: The Plagiarism Spectrum, www.turnitin.com. Accessed 8 June 2012.
- Vardi, I. (2012). Developing students’ referencing skills: A matter of plagiarism, punishment and morality or of learning to write critically? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 921–930.Google Scholar
- Walker, A. L. (2008). Preventing unintentional plagiarism: A method for strengthening paraphrasing skills. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(4), 387–395.Google Scholar