Advertisement

“The White Version of Cheating?” Ethical and Social Equity Concerns of Cognitive Enhancing Drug Users in Higher Education

  • Ross AikinsEmail author
Article

Abstract

So-called cognitive enhancing drugs (CEDs) are relatively common in higher education, especially among students who are white, male, and attend highly selective institutions. Using qualitative data from a diverse sample of 32 students at an elite university, the present study aims to examine whether students perceive CED use to be advantageous, equitable, and fair. Participants were either medical or nonmedical users of CEDs—primarily ADHD stimulant medications such as Adderall. Data were first coded openly, then axially into themes, and finally arranged to respond to research aims around social and ethical concerns. Ethical perceptions and behavioral justifications varied by participants’ personal use frequency, class standing, and perceived social norms surrounding CEDs. Among the salient themes to emerge was the belief that CED use is a lesser or more tenable form of cheating, that the vagueness and prevalence of ADHD justifies nonmedical use, and that above all, CEDs are advantageous. Some participants expressed concern about the advantageousness of CEDs when coupled with a perceived imbalance of their use among students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds, with one calling it “the white version of cheating.” Implications for cheating and drug use prevention are discussed, situating cognitive enhancement as an emerging ethical and social equity concern in higher education.

Keywords

Cognitive enhancement Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants Academic integrity Ethics Cheating Higher education Social equity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The development of this manuscript was supported in part by research grant T32DA007233 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, and from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. The National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, and U.S. Department of Education had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Education, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, or the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aikins, R. (2011). Academic performance enhancement: a qualitative study of the perceptions and habits of prescription stimulant-using college students. Journal of College Student Development, 52(5), 560–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikins, R., Zhang, X., & McCabe, S. E. (2017). Academic doping: institutional policies regarding nonmedical use of prescription stimulants in U.S. higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(3), 229–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9291-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arria, A. M., Caldeira, K. M., O'Grady, K. E., Vincent, K. B., Fitzelle, D. B., Johnson, E. P., & Wish, E. D. (2008a). Drug exposure opportunities and use patterns among college students: results of a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Substance Abuse, 29(4), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arria, A. M., O'Grady, K. E., Caldeira, K. M., Vincent, K. B., & Wish, E. D. (2008b). Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and analgesics: associations with social and academic behaviors among college students. Journal of Drug Issues, 38(4), 1045–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arria, A. M., Wilcox, H. C., Caldeira, K. M., Vincent, K. B., Garnier-Dykstra, L. M., & O'Grady, K. E. (2013). Dispelling the myth of "smart drugs": cannabis and alcohol use problems predict nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for studying. Addictive Behaviors, 38(3), 1643–1650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arria, A. M., Caldeira, K. M., Vincent, K. B., O'Grady, K. E., Cimini, M. D., Geisner, I. M., ... Larimer, M. E. (2017). Do college students improve their grades by using prescription stimulants nonmedically? Addictive Behaviors, 65, 245–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.016.
  7. Arria, A. M., Geisner, I. M., Cimini, M. D., Kilmer, J. R., Caldeira, K. M., Barrall, A. L., ... Larimer, M. E. (2018). Perceived academic benefit is associated with nonmedical prescription stimulant use among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 76, 27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.013.
  8. Bagot, K. S., & Kaminer, Y. (2014). Efficacy of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in non-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder youth: a systematic review. Addiction, 109(4), 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett, S. P., Darredeau, C., Brody, L. E., & Pihl, R. O. (2005). Characteristics of methylphenidate misuse in a university student sample. Canada Journal of Psychiatry, 50(8), 457–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bensimon, E. M., & Bishop, R. (2012). Introduction: why "critical"? The need for new ways of knowing. The Review of Higher Education, 36, 1), 1–1), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Breslau, J., Miller, E., Joanie Chung, W. J., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2011). Childhood and adolescent onset psychiatric disorders, substance use, and failure to graduate high school on time. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(3), 295–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cakic, V. (2009). Smart drugs for cognitive enhancement: ethical and pragmatic considerations in the era of cosmetic neurology. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(10), 611–615.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.030882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, R. (2013). The competition drug, The New York Times.Google Scholar
  15. Conrad, P., & Potter, D. (2000). From hyperactive children to ADHD adults: observations on the expansion of medical categories. Social Problems, 47(4), 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc..Google Scholar
  17. Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.Google Scholar
  18. DeSantis, A. D., & Hane, A. C. (2010). "Adderall is definitely not a drug": justifications for the illegal use of ADHD stimulants. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeSantis, A. D., Webb, E. M., & Noar, S. M. (2008). Illicit use of prescription ADHD medications on a college campus: a multimethodological approach. Journal of American College Health, 57(3), 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Desruisseaux, P. (1999). Cheating is reaching epidemic proportions worldwide, researchers say. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A45Google Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: the impact of status culture on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dodge, T., Williams, K. J., Marzell, M., & Turrisi, R. (2012). Judging cheaters: is substance misuse viewed similarly in the athletic and academic domains? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(3), 678–682.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elder, T. E. (2010). The importance of relative standards in ADHD diagnoses: evidence based on exact birth dates. Journal of Health Economics, 29(5), 641–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forlini, C., & Racine, E. (2009). Autonomy and coercion in academic “cognitive enhancement” using methylphenidate: perspectives of key stakeholders. Neuroethics, 2(3), 163–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-009-9043-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garnier, L. M., Arria, A. M., Caldeira, K. M., Vincent, K. B., O'Grady, K. E., & Wish, E. D. (2010). Sharing and selling of prescription medications in a college student sample. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71(3), 262–269.  https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.09m05189ecr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: a questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36(6), 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodman, R. (2010). Cognitive enhancement, cheating, and accomplishment. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(2), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gorski, P. C. (2012). Perceiving the problem of poverty and schooling: deconstructing the class stereotypes that Mis-shape education practice and policy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(2), 302–319.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.666934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greely, H., Sahakian, B., Harris, J., Kessler, R. C., Gazzaniga, M., Campbell, P., & Farah, M. J. (2008). Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature, 456, 702–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harper, S. R., Patton, L. D., & Wooden, O. S. (2009). Access and equity for African American students in higher education: a critical race historical analysis of policy efforts. Journal of Higher Education, 80(4), 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartnett, D. N., Nelson, J. M., & Rinn, A. N. (2004). Gifted or ADHD? The possibilities of misdiagnosis. Roeper Review, 26(2), 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hotze, T. D., Shah, K., Anderson, E. E., & Wynia, M. K. (2011). "Doctor, would you prescribe a pill to help me ... ?" A national survey of physicians on using medicine for human enhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(1), 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.534957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2011 (Vol. 2). Bethesda: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).Google Scholar
  34. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E., & Miech, R. A. (2016). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2015: Volume 2, college students and adults ages 19–55. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2006). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: fundamental elements and issues. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  36. Karen, D. (2002). Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980-1992. Sociology of Education, 75(3), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lamkin, M. (2011). A ban on brain-boosting drugs is not the answer. The Chronicle of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  38. Lawson, W. (2004). ADHD: diagnosis dilemma—mental health experts debate definitions of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and patterns of diagnosis and mediation by socioeconomic class. Psychology Today, September/October.Google Scholar
  39. Lee Booksh, R., Pella, R. D., Singh, A. N., & Drew Gouvier, W. (2010). Ability of college students to simulate ADHD on objective measures of attention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13(4), 325–338.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708329927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Low, K. G., & Gendaszek, A. E. (2002). Illicit use of pschostimulants among college students: a preliminary study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 7(3), 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: a review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCabe, S. E. (2008). Misperceptions of non-medical prescription drug use: a web survey of college students. Addictive Behaviors, 33(5), 713–724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.Google Scholar
  44. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCabe, S. E., Knight, J. R., Teter, C. J., & Wechsler, H. (2005). Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction, 100(1), 96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00944.x/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCabe, S. E., Teter, C. J., & Boyd, C. J. (2006). Medical use, illicit use, and diversion of abusable prescription drugs. Journal of American College Health, 54(5), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCabe, S. E., Morales, M., Cranford, J. A., Delva, J., McPherson, M. D., & Boyd, C. J. (2007). Race/ethnicity and gender differences in drug use and abuse among college students. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 6(2), 75–95.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J233v06n02_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCabe, S. E., Veliz, P., Wilens, T. E., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2017). Adolescents' prescription stimulant use and adult functional outcomes: a National Prospective Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(3), 226–233 e224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McDonough, P., Korn, J., & Yamanski, E. (1997). Access, equity, and the privatization of college counseling. The Review of Higher Education, 20(3), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mohamed, A. R., & Fritsvold, E. D. (2010). Dorm room dealers: drugs and the privileges of race and class. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Molnar, K. K., & Kletke, M. G. (2012). Does the type of cheating influence undergraduate Students' perceptions of cheating? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9164-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perna, L. W., & Finney, J. E. (2014). The attainment agenda: state policy leadership in higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Reisinger, K. B., Rutledge, P. C., & Conklin, S. M. (2016). Study drugs and academic integrity: the role of beliefs about an academic honor code in the prediction of nonmedical prescription drug use for academic enhancement. Journal of College Student Development, 57(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Repantis, D., Schlattmann, P., Laisney, O., & Heuser, I. (2010). Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: a systematic review. Pharmacological Research, 62(3), 187–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 72(3), 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sattler, S., Mehlkop, G., Graeff, P., & Sauer, C. (2014). Evaluating the drivers of and obstacles to the willingness to use cognitive enhancement drugs: the influence of drug characteristics, social environment, and personal characteristics. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9(8), 1–14.Google Scholar
  58. Schelle, K. J., Faulmuller, N., Caviola, L., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement-a review. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 53.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schermer, M. (2008). On the argument that enhancement is "cheating". Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(2), 85–88.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.019646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwarz, A. (2012). Risky rise of the good-grade pill. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  61. Seider, M. (2008). The dynamics of social reproduction: How class works at a state college and elite private college†. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(1), 45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680701774154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, M. E., & Farah, M. J. (2011). Are prescription stimulants "smart pills"? The epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience of prescription stimulant use by normal healthy individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 717–741.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Talbot, M. (2009). Brain gain: the underground world of "neuroenhancing" drugs. The New Yorker.Google Scholar
  64. Teter, C. J., McCabe, S. E., Cranford, J. A., Boyd, C. J., & Guthrie, S. K. . (2005). Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 53(6), 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration Office of Diversion Control. (U.S. DEA DoJ). (2008). Controlled substance schedules. Retrieved December 7, 2018 http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/index.html
  66. USNews.com, U.S. News and World Reports. (2013). National College Rankings. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/
  67. Visser, S. N., Bitsko, R. H., Danielson, M. L., Perou, R., & Blumberg, S. J. (2010). Increasing prevalence of parent reported attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children—United States, 2003 and 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 59(44), 1439–1443.Google Scholar
  68. Walker, M., & Townley, C. (2012). Contract cheating: a new challenge for academic honesty? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(1), 27–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9150-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. White, B. P., Becker-Blease, K. A., & Grace-Bishop, K. (2006). Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in and undergraduate and graduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 54(5), 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations