Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disregarded Conflicting Results with Prior Research: A Case Report in a Leading Biomedical Journal

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bibliographic negligence, i.e. omission of citation of the relevant work of other researchers, is possibly the most common type of research misconduct, leading to unfair loss of priority of authorship and undermining the reward system of science. We report a case of bibliographic negligence which we recently suffered from a leading biomedical journal. The case is discussed in the context of the editorial policy of the journal and of relevant ethical guidelines. Scientific journals should develop codes of conduct for citations. In addition, the implications and consequences of bibliographic negligence deserve thorough investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Garfield, E. (1982). More on the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science. Current Contents, 30, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1991). Bibliographic negligence: a serious transgression. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 5 (23), 14.

  • Ginsburg, I. (2001). The Disregard Syndrome: a menace to honest science. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 15 (24), 51.

  • Kumar, M. N. (2008). A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(3), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestroni, G. J., Conti, A., & Pedrinis, E. (1992). Effect of adrenergic agents on hematopoiesis after syngeneic bone marrow transplantation in mice. Blood, 80, 1178–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science pp. 402–403. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2011). A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154(1), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers who provided constructive comments on the earlier version of the paper, which helped to considerably improve it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Research in Medical Pharmacology, University of Insubria, Via Ottorino Rossi n. 9, 21100, Varese, VA, Italy

    Marco Cosentino, Franca Marino & Georges J. M. Maestroni

Authors
  1. Marco Cosentino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franca Marino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Georges J. M. Maestroni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Cosentino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cosentino, M., Marino, F. & Maestroni, G.J.M. Disregarded Conflicting Results with Prior Research: A Case Report in a Leading Biomedical Journal. J Acad Ethics 12, 245–249 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9213-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9213-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation