The Effects of a Technology-Based Self-monitoring Intervention on On-Task, Disruptive, and Task-Completion Behaviors for Adolescents with Autism
- 192 Downloads
Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often present with difficulty in sustaining engagement, attention, and have disruptive behavior in classroom settings. Without appropriate intervention, these challenging behaviors often persist and negatively impact educational outcomes. Self-monitoring is a well-supported evidence-based practice for addressing challenging behaviors and improving pro-social behaviors for individuals with ASD. Self-monitoring procedures utilizing a handheld computer-based technology is an unobtrusive and innovative way of implementing the intervention. A withdrawal design was employed to assess the effectiveness of a technologically-delivered self-monitoring intervention (I-Connect) in improving on-task and task completion behaviors and decreasing disruptive behavior with four adolescents with ASD. Results demonstrated improvements in on-task and task completion behaviors across all four participants and disruptive behavior improved for two participants.
KeywordsAutism Self-monitoring Technology I-Connect Behavior
RR designed the study, collected data, made condition change decisions, and drafted the manuscript. HPW assisted with the design, assisted with recruitment, conducted the IRB submission, and assisted with edits. RM was involved in the interpretation of the data and results section. JMH was a secondary data collector, assisted with preparation of data for results and helped edit the manuscript along with revisions of it. BAM helped with the design and the conception of the study along with the formation of the introduction of the manuscript.
This study was funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (Grant Number H133A130032) and the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Speical Education Programs (H327S170001).
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- ASD On The Go: Modules. (2019). Retrieved from https://asdonthego.ku.edu/.
- Bouck, E. C., Savage, M., Meyer, N. K., Taber-Doughty, T., & Hunley, M. (2014). High-tech or low-tech? Comparing self-monitoring systems to increase task independence for students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders,29(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614528797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cihak, D. F., Wright, R., & Ayres, K. M. (2010). Use of self-modeling static-picture prompts via a handheld computer to facilitate self-monitoring in the general education classroom. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,45, 136–149.Google Scholar
- Clemons, L. L., Mason, B., A., Garrison-Kane, L., & Wills, H. P. (2016). Self-monitoring for high school students with disabilities: A cross-categorical investigation of I-Connect. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervenitons,18(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715596134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Crutchfield, S. A., Mason, R. A., Chambers, A., Wills, H. P., & Mason, B. A. (2015). Use of a self-monitoring application to reduce stereotypic behavior in adolescents with autism: A preliminary investigation of I-Connect. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,45(5), 1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2272-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganz, J. B., & Sigafoos, J. (2005). Self-monitoring: Are young adults with MR and autism able to utilize cognitive strategies independently? Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,40(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
- Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (2000). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
- Legge, D. B., DeBar, R. M., & Alber-Morgan, S. R. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring with a MotivAider® on the on-task behavior of fifth and sixth graders with autism and other disabilities. Journal of Behavior Assessment and Intervention in Children,1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaughn, S., Bos, C. S., & Schumm, J. S. (2000). Teaching exceptional, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M., Hughes, C., Agran, M., Garner, N., & Yeager, D. (2003). Student-directed learning strategies to promote the progress of students with intellectual disability in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education,7(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360311032000110963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,38(2), 131–144.Google Scholar
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2019). Procedures and standards handbook (version 2.0). Retrieved August 13, 2019, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/doc.aspx?docid=19&tocid=1.