Advertisement

Brief Report: Evaluating College Students’ Perceptions of a Child Displaying Stereotypic Behaviors: Do Changes in Stereotypy Levels Affect Ratings?

  • Jodi C. Coon
  • John T. RappEmail author
Brief Report

Abstract

One reason for treating stereotypic behavior is that it may negatively impact how others perceive the individual displaying the behavior, thus impeding social interactions; however, few studies have directly evaluated this possibility. As a first step toward testing this position, participants (college students) in Study 1 watched 5-min video clips of a child engaging in hand/finger motor stereotypy at varying levels (0%, 17%, 37%, and 40% of the time) while sound was muted. Following each video, participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate their perception of the child. In Study 2, additional participants completed the same questionnaire after watching the same videos with the sound unmuted to determine if the addition of vocal stereotypy altered their perceptions of the child. Results indicate that (a) observers negatively rated the child when he displayed motor stereotypy for 17% or more of a video clip and (b) the addition of vocal stereotypy yielded more negative judgements than motor stereotypy alone.

Keywords

Leisure time Motor stereotypy Judgements of stereotypy Vocal stereotypy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Marissa Spiwak, Lydia Lindsay, and Corinne Bloom for assistance with data collection.

Author Contributions

JCC co-conceived and co-designed the experiments, collected data for the study, performed the analyses, and co-wrote the paper. JTR co-conceived and co-designed the experiments and co-wrote the paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakan, M. B. (2014). The musicality of stimming: Promoting neurodiversity in the ethnomusicology of autism. MUSICultures, 41, 133–161.Google Scholar
  3. Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., Parker, D. E., & Lewis, M. H. (2000). Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: Comparisons to mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 237–243.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005596502855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Diagnostic criteria for 299.00 autism spectrum disorder. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/hcp-dsm.html.
  5. Chebli, S. S., Martin, V., & Lanovaz, M. J. (2016). Prevalence of stereotypy in individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3, 107–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-016-0069-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, J. L., & Rapp, J. T. (2018). To what extent do practitioners need to treat stereotypy during academic tasks? Behavior Modification.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445518808226.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  8. Cunningham, A. B., & Schreibman, L. (2008). Stereotypy in autism: The importance of function. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 469–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaetano, J. (2018). Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction: An Excel calculator (1.3) [Microsoft Excel workbook]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322568540_HolmBonferroni_sequential_correction_An_Excel_calculator_13.
  10. Griffin, W. B. (2018). Peer perceptions of students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618800035.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman, R. B. (2015). Judgments of social awkwardness from brief exposure to children with and without high functioning autism. Autism, 19(5), 580–587.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314536937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman, R. B., Edelson, L., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2013). Production of emotional facial and vocal expressions during story retelling by children and adolescents with high-functioning autism. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 56(3), 1035–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, R. S. P., Wint, D., & Ellis, N. C. (1990). The social effects of stereotyped behavior. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 34, 261–268.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1990.tb01537.x.Google Scholar
  14. Lampi, A., Fitzpatrick, P., Romero, V., Amaral, J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2018). Understanding the influence of social and motor context on the co-occurring frequency of restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3698-3. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  15. Long, E. S., Miltenberger, R. G., & Rapp, J. T. (1998). A survey of habit behaviors exhibited by individuals with mental retardation. Behavioral Interventions, 13, 79–89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099.078x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Long, E. S., Woods, D. W., Miltenberger, R. G., Fuqua, R. W., & Boudjouk, P. J. (1999). Examining the social effects of habit behaviors exhibited by individuals with mental retardation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 295–312.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021862723409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDonald, R., Green, G., Mansfield, R., Geckeler, A., Gardenier, N., Anderson, J.,… Sanchez, J. (2007). Stereotypy in young children with autism and typically developing children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 266–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2006.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C. (2003). Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mudford, O. C., Martin, N. T., Hui, J. K. Y., & Taylor, S. (2009). Assessing observer accuracy in continuous recording of rate and duration: Three algorithms compared. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 527–539.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newell, K. M., Incledon, T., Bodfish, J. W., & Sprague, R. L. (1999). Variability of stereotypic body-rocking in adults with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rapp, J. T., & Vollmer, T. R. (2005). Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 527–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swaim, K. F., & Morgan, S. B. (2001). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer with autistic behaviors: Does a brief educational intervention have an effect? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 195–205.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010703316365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Symons, F. J., Sperry, L. A., Dropik, P. L., & Bodfish, J. W. (2005). The early development of stereotypy and self-injury: A review of research methods. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 144–158.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00632.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zablotsky, B., Bradshaw, C. P., Anderson, C. M., & Law, P. (2014). Risk factors for bullying among children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 18, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations