Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 1352–1365 | Cite as

Predictors of Pragmatic Communication in School-Age Siblings of Children with ASD and Low-Risk Controls

  • Kathryn J. Greenslade
  • Elizabeth A. Utter
  • Rebecca J. LandaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Little empirical evidence exists about school-age pragmatic communication or predictors in siblings at heightened familial risk for ASD (HR) and low-risk (LR) controls. The Pragmatic Rating Scale-School-Age (Landa unpublished) was scored for 49 HR siblings and 18 LR controls at 8–12 years. Social-communication and language measures were collected between 14 and 36 months. At 36-months, siblings were classified as ASD (HR-ASD, n = 15), broad autism phenotype (HR-BAP, n = 19), or typically developing (HR-TD, n = 15). Results revealed a pragmatic continuum with significantly better scores for HR-TD than HR-BAP or HR-ASD, and HR-BAP than HR-ASD. Per regression models including all participants, 14-month joint attention initiations predicted school-age pragmatic communication, as did 24-month social-communication and expressive language scores. Early joint attention, social-communication, and language abilities contribute to later pragmatic functioning.

Keywords

Pragmatic language High risk siblings Broad autism phenotype Joint attention Social-communication Autism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Grant MH59630 from the National Institute of Mental Health (R.J.L., principal investigator). We also thank the many research clinicians who collected this study’s data, and the superb staff who provided administrative support, videotaped assessment sessions, and processed data. We also thank Luther Kalb for his expert consultation in nonparametric statistical analysis. Most importantly, we thank the participants and their families, who made this study possible.

Author Contributions

RJL conceived of the study and obtained the funding. KJG and RJL planned the analyses. KJG and EAU coded the PRS-SA data, with input from RJL. KJG conducted the analyses. KJG and RJL interpreted the results. KJG took the lead in writing the manuscript. RJL provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript. EAU read and agreed with the contents of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest are declared.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All families gave written informed consent for child participation; at school-age, children provided verbal assent.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Yizhak, N., Yirmiya, N., Seidman, I., Alon, R., Lord, C., & Sigman, M. (2011). Pragmatic language and school related linguistic abilities in siblings of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(6), 750–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC-2). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, D. V. M., Mayberry, M., Wong, D., Maley, A., & Hallmayer, J. (2006). Characteristics of the broader phenotype in autism: A study of siblings using the Children’s Communication Checklist-2. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 141B, 117–122.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charman, T., Young, G. S., Brian, J., Carter, A., Carver, L. J., Chawarska, K., et al. (2017). Non-ASD outcomes at 36 months in siblings at familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A baby siblings research consortium (BSRC) study. Autism Research, 10(1), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Constantino, J. (2011). The quantitative nature of autistic social impairment. Pediatric Research, 69(5 PT 2), 55R–62R.  https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e318212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donaldson, A. L., & Olswang, L. B. (2009). Investigating requests for information in children with autism spectrum disorders: Static versus dynamic assessment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9(4), 297–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701413720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drumm, E., & Brian, J. (2013). The developing language abilities and increased risks of ‘unaffected’ siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychiatry, 3(5), 513–524.  https://doi.org/10.2217/NPY.13.65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drumm, E., Bryson, S., Zwaigenbaum, L., & Brian, J. (2015). Language-related abilities in ‘unaffected’ school-aged siblings of children with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 18, 83–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folstein, S., & Rutter, M. (1977). Infantile autism: A genetic study of 21 twin pairs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18(4), 297–321.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1977.tb00443.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujiki, M., Brinton, B., Isaacson, T., & Summers, C. (2001). Social behaviors of children with language impairment on the playground: A pilot study. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Georgiades, S., Szatmari, P., Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Brian, J., Roberts, W., et al. (2013). A prospective study of autistic-like traits in unaffected siblings of probands with autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(1), 42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gessaroli, E., Santelli, E., di Pellegrino, G., & Frassinetti, F. (2013). Personal space regulation in childhood autism spectrum disorders. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e74959.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillespie-Lynch, K., Khalulyan, A., del Rosario, M., McCarthy, B., Gomez, L., Sigman, M., et al. (2015). Is early joint attention associated with school-age pragmatic language? Autism, 19(2), 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hale, C. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005). Social communication in children with autism: The relationship between theory of mind and discourse development. Autism, 9(2), 157–178.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361305051395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thought and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hess, C. R., & Landa, R. J. (2012). Predictive and concurrent validity of parent concern about young children at risk for autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(4), 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven: Department of Sociology, Yale University.Google Scholar
  21. Hurley, R. S., Losh, M., Parlier, M., Reznick, J. S., & Piven, J. (2007). The broad autism phenotype questionnaire. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(9), 1679–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy Krieger Institute. (2013). Early signs of autism video tutorial—Kennedy Krieger Institute [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtvP5A5OHpU.
  23. Klusek, J., Losh, M., & Martin, G. E. (2014). Sex differences and within-family associations in the broad autism phenotype. Autism, 18(2), 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klusek, J., Martin, G. E., & Losh, M. (2014). A comparison of pragmatic language in boys with autism and fragile X syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1692–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lam, Y. G., & Yeung, S. S. S. (2012). Towards a convergent account of pragmatic language deficits in high-functioning autism: Depicting the phenotype using the Pragmatic Rating Scale. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 792–797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landa, R., Folstein, S. E., & Isaacs, C. (1991). Spontaneous narrative-discourse performance of parents of autistic individuals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(6), 1339–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3406.1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landa, R., Piven, J., Wzorek, M. M., Gayle, J. O., Chase, G. A., & Folstein, S. E. (1992). Social language use in parents of autistic individuals. Psychological Medicine, 22(01), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landa, R. J., Holman, K. C., & Garrett-Mayer, E. (2007). Social and communication development in toddlers with early and later diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(7), 853–864.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Landa, R. J., Holman, K. C., O’Neill, A. H., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). Intervention targeting development of socially synchronous engagement in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(1), 13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lavery, M. R., Acharya, P., Sivo, S. A., & Xu, L. (2017). Number of predictors and multicollinearity: What are their effects on error and bias in regression. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2017.1371750.Google Scholar
  31. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  32. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (2nd ed.). Torrance: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  33. Losh, M., & Piven, J. (2007). Social-cognition and the broad autism phenotype: Identifying genetically meaningful phenotypes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(1), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malesa, E., Foss-Feig, J., Yoder, P., Warren, Z., Walden, T., & Stone, W. (2012). Predicting language and social outcomes at age 5 for later-born siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 17(5), 558–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Messinger, D., Young, G. S., Ozonoff, S., Dobkins, K., Carter, A., Zwaigenbaum, L., et al. (2013). Beyond autism: A baby siblings research consortium study of high-risk children at three years of age. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(3), 300–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, M., Young, G. S., Hutman, T., Johnson, S., Schwichtenberg, A. J., & Ozonoff, S. (2015). Early pragmatic language difficulties in siblings of children with autism: Implications for DSM-5 social communication disorder? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(7), 774–781.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen Scales of Early Learning. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  38. Mundy, P., Block, J., Delgado, C., Pomares, Y., Van Hecke, A. V., & Parlade, M. V. (2007). Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child Development, 78(3), 938–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mundy, P., Sullivan, L., & Mastergeorge, A. (2009). A parallel and distributed processing model of joint attention, social-cognition and autism. Autism Research, 2(1), 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Neill, D. (2007). The Language Use Inventory for young children: A parent-report measure of pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 50(1), 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1996). An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language, 52(3), 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ozonoff, S., Young, G., Belding, A., Hill, M., Hill, A., Hutman, T., et al. (2014). The broader autism phenotype in infancy: When does it emerge? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(4), 398–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paul, R., Orlovski, S. M., Marcinko, H. C., & Volkmar, F. (2009). Conversational behaviors in youth with high-functioning ASD and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0607-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piven, J., Palmer, P., Landa, R., Santangelo, S., Jacobi, D., & Childress, D. (1997). Personality and language characteristics in parents from multiple-incidence autism families. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 74(4), 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roth, F. P., & Spekman, N. J. (1984a). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part 1. Organizational framework and assessment parameters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roth, F. P., & Spekman, N. J. (1984b). Assessing the pragmatic abilities of children: Part 2. Guidelines, considerations, and specific evaluation procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49(1), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simmons, E. S., Paul, R., & Volkmar, F. (2014). Assessing pragmatic language in autism spectrum disorder: The Yale in vivo Pragmatic Protocol. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2162–2173.  https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-14-0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. statistics.laerd.com (2018). Principal components analysis (PCA): Background & requirements. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/pca/pca-in-spss-3.php.
  51. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Caronna, E. (2007). Language disorders: Autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 54, 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomasello, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 132–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–690.Google Scholar
  54. Turkstra, L. S., Clark, A., Burgess, S., Hengst, J. A., Wertheimer, J. C., & Paul, D. (2017). Pragmatic communication abilities in children and adults: Implications for rehabilitation professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(18), 1872–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Hecke, A. V., Mundy, P. C., Acra, C. F., Block, J. J., Delgado, C. E., Parlade, M. V., et al. (2007). Infant joint attention, temperament, and social competence in preschool children. Child Development, 78(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Virkud, Y. V., Todd, R. D., Abbacchi, A. M., Zhang, Y., & Constantino, J. N. (2009). Familial aggregation of quantitative autistic traits in multiplex versus simplex autism. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 150B(3), 328–334.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (2002). Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  58. World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Sciences and DisordersUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Kennedy Krieger InstituteCenter for Autism and Related DisordersBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations