Responses to Vignettes Depicting Friendship Transgressions: Similarities and Differences in Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder
- 275 Downloads
We examined children’s responses to vignettes depicting a child making one of four friendship transgressions; failing to provide validation, failing to provide help, being an unreliable partner, and betrayal. Twenty elementary students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 21 typically developing (TD) students participated. Children rated emotional responses, the strategies they would use following each transgression, interpretations of transgressions, and goals of their responses. Children with ASD rated sadness lower than TD children, and rated verbal aggression strategies higher than TD children. There were several significant correlations between emotional responses and goals, strategies, and interpretations in the ASD group. Betrayal was considered the most severe transgression. These results will aid researchers aiming to support friendship maintenance in children with ASD.
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorder Friendships Conflict Friendship transgressions
We would like to thank Jessica Barnes and Maryam Moravvej Farshi for their assistance in conducting this research. We would also like to thank the teachers and parents who assisted in coordinating or providing data, and the many participants who agreed to complete the interview surveys.
KBB participated in the study design, supervised data collection, conducted the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. CM coordinated recruitment and data collection, conducted participant interviews, and participated in editing the manuscript. JC participated in data collection, and in editing the manuscript. SYK assisted in data analysis and in editing the manuscript. JM participated in the study design and statistical analysis, and edited the manuscript.
This research was not supported by any specific funding source.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed parental consent and participant assent was obtained from all individuals prior to their participation in this study.
- Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). An essay on autism and theory of mind. Mindblindness: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). The Social Responsiveness Scale Manual, Second Edition (SRS-2). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Jaswal, V. K., & Akhtar, N. (2018). Being vs. appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1–84.Google Scholar
- Laursen, B., & Adams, R. (2018). Conflict between peers. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd edition, p. 265). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. L. (2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, second edition (ADOS-2) manual (Part I): Modules 1–4. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Rowley, E., Chandler, S., Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Loucas, T., & Charman, T. (2012). The experiences of friendship, victimization and bullying in children with an autism spectrum disorder: Associations with child characteristics and school placement. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1126–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner & Ν Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (6th edn., pp. 571–645). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Van Bourgondien, M. E., Wellman, G. J., & Love, S. R. (2010). Childhood autism rating scale, (CARS-2). Torrance: Western Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (2nd edn.). San Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar