Roles, Strengths and Challenges of Using Robots in Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
- 1k Downloads
The aim of this research was to study roles, strengths and challenges of robot-mediated interventions using robot KASPAR for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Twelve focus group sessions were organized in which 70 ASD care and/or education professionals participated. Six roles for KASPAR were identified: provoker, reinforcer, trainer, mediator, prompter, and diagnostic information provider. Strengths of KASPAR are related to personalisation possibilities, its playfulness, the action–reaction principle, its neutral expression, consistent and repetitive application of actions, possibilities to vary behaviour in a controlled manner and having an extra hand. Challenges of working with KASPAR were: limited reaction possibilities, possibility of children being scared of KASPAR, difficulties with generalisation or transfer and finally potential dependence on KASPAR.
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorders Robot KASPAR ASD Children Robot mediated intervention
This work has been funded by a grant of the RAAK-PRO programme of SIA (“Stichting Innovatie Alliantie”) for the project “Social robots in care” (project number PRO-4-10). With this programme, the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science aim to stimulate collaboration between public and private organisation. We are thankful for Professor Kerstin Dautenhahn and Dr. Ben Robins from the Adaptive Systems Group at the University of Hertfordshire (UK) who kindly provided us with a KASPAR platform to be used in this project. Moreover, we are grateful for the participation of the many participants in this study; they are warmly thanked for their dedication and involvement.
The research presented in this article is part of the PhD work of the first author (CAGJH) who is the main researcher of the study, involved in coordination, design, execution and interpretation of the research and writing the manuscript. The second author (MASL) is the copromoter of the PhD candidate and was involved in the preparation of the study protocol, interpretation of the results and writing the manuscript. The third author (RJ) participated in data collection and analysis of the focus group sessions. The fourth author (LPdW) is the main supervisor and promoter in this project and involved in preparation of the study protocol, interpretation of results and in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
This study was funded by a grant of the RAAK-PRO programme of SIA (“Stichting Innovatie Alliantie”) for the project “Social robots in care” (project number PRO-4-10).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Huijnen, Lexis, Jansens, de Witte declares that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Book, American Psychiatric Pub.Google Scholar
- Costa, S., Lehmann, H., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Soares, F. (2013). “Where is your nose?”: Developing body awareness skills among children with autism using a humanoid robot. In ACHI 2013, the Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (pp. 117–122). IARIA, 2013.Google Scholar
- Diehl, J. J., Crowell, C. R., Villano, M., Wier, K., Tang, K., & Riek, L. D. (2014). Clinical applications of robots in Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis and treatment. In B. V. Patel, R. V. Preedy & R. C. Martin (Eds.), Comprehensive guide to autism (pp. 411–422). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4788-7_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Draper, H., Sorell, T., Bedaf, S., Syrdal, D. S., Gutierrez-Ruiz, C., Duclos, A., & Amirabdollahian, F. (2014). Ethical dimensions of human-robot interactions in the care of older people: Insights from 21 focus groups convened in the UK, France and the Netherlands. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 135–145). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Huijnen, C. A., Lexis, M. A., Jansens, R., & de Witte, L. P. (2017). How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with autism, parents and professionals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(10), 3079–3096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miskam, M. A., Hamid, M. A. C., Yussof, H., Shamsuddin, S., Malik, N. A., & Basir, S. N. (2013). Study on social interaction between children with autism and humanoid robot NAO. In Applied mechanics and materials (Vol. 393, pp. 573–578). Zürich: Trans Tech Publications.Google Scholar
- Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dickerson, P. (2009). From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI 2009, 205–211.Google Scholar
- Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dubowski, J. (2004). Investigating autistic children’s attitudes towards strangers with the theatrical robot—A new experimental paradigm in human-robot interaction studies. In RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759) (pp. 557–562).Google Scholar
- Scassellati, B., Henny A., & Matarić, M. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14(1), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wainer, J. (2012). Facilitating collaboration among children with autism through robot-assisted play (Thesis). University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
- Wainer, J., Dautenhahn, K., Robins, B., & Amirabdollahian, F. (2010). Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism. In 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Humanoids 2010 (pp. 631–638). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2010.5686346.
- Wainer, J., Robins, B., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2014). Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 6(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2014.2303116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar