A Retrospective Chart Review of Children with ASD’s Individual Education Plans Compared to Subsequent Independent Psychological Evaluations
- 496 Downloads
The heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) makes it difficult for school-based professionals to develop effective Individual Education Plans (IEP) for this group. Limited research exists on the quality of IEP programs for individuals with ASD. This article summarizes the results of a retrospective chart review from an outpatient diagnostic center. Researchers collected data from IEPs and subsequent psychological evaluations of 75 individuals diagnosed with ASD. The implications of these results for future research and practice are discussed.
KeywordsAutism Spectrum Disorder Individualized Education Plans Adaptive skills Behavior
The research was funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Grant Number: 90DD0015-003). The authors would like to thank Brian Reichow who assisted with a pilot version of this study.
NWG participated in the design and coordination of this study as well as taking the lead in writing the manuscript. MBB participated in the design of the study and contributed to manuscript. ED participated in data collection and contributed to the manuscript. JDM participated in the design of the study and contributed to the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of (2004), 20 USC § 1414.Google Scholar
- Klin, A., Saulnier, C. A., Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., Volkmar, F. R., & Lord, C. (2007). Social and communication abilities and disabilities in higher functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders: The Vineland and the ADOS. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 748–759.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism diagnostic observation schedule-second edition: Manual. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- National Research Council, Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A.-M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., et al. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Van Bourgondien, M., Wellman, J., & Love, S. (2010). Childhood Autism Rating Scale—Second edition: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Shattuck, P. T., Narendorf, S. C., Cooper, B., Sterzing, P. R., Wagner, M., & Lounds Taylor, J. (2012). Postsecondary education and employment Among youth with an autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics, 129(6), 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Second edition. Livonia, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K., Cox, A. W., Fetting, A., Kurcharczyk, S., et al. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute. Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.Google Scholar