Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 48, Issue 11, pp 3965–3971 | Cite as

Brief Report: A Survey of Autism Research Priorities Across a Diverse Community of Stakeholders

  • Thomas W. FrazierEmail author
  • Geraldine Dawson
  • Donna Murray
  • Andy Shih
  • Jessica Snyder Sachs
  • Angela Geiger
Brief Report


Inclusion of stakeholder voices in the allocation of research funding can increase the relevance of results and improve community engagement in research. We describe the results of an online survey that gathered input from community stakeholders regarding autism research priorities. A demographically diverse sample of respondents (N = 6004; 79.1% female; 72.5% ages 30–59; 86.4% USA) completed the survey. Results indicated a preference for applied relative to basic science topics, though both basic and applied science areas were rated as important. Respondents gave their highest ratings to research focused on co-occurring conditions, health and well-being, adult transition, and lifespan issues. These results can guide decision-making by public and private funders when developing science funding priorities and engaging in science dissemination activities.


Autism Research priorities Caregivers Funding Stakeholders Adult transition 



The authors wish to acknowledge all the stakeholders who participated in this survey.

Author Contributions

TWF and DM conceived of the study. All authors participated in its design and coordination. TWF completed the initial draft of the manuscript; TWF performed the statistical analysis; and TWF, GD, DM, and AS contributed to results interpretation. All authors contributed to key revisions of the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary material

10803_2018_3642_MOESM1_ESM.docx (222 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 222 KB)


  1. AppFT: Patent Application and Full-Text Image Database (2017). Accessed 28 Dec 2017.
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Editorial perspective: Neurodiversity—A revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 58(6), 744–747. Scholar
  3. de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Won, H., Stein, J. L., & Geschwind, D. H. (2016). Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics. Nature Medicine, 22(4), 345–361. Scholar
  4. Fletcher-Watson, S., Apicella, F., Auyeung, B., Beranova, S., Bonnet-Brilhault, F., Canal-Bedia, R., et al. (2017a). Attitudes of the autism community to early autism research. Autism, 21(1), 61–74. Scholar
  5. Fletcher-Watson, S., Larsen, K., & Salomone, E. & Members of the, C. E. W. G. (2017b). What do parents of children with autism expect from participation in research? A community survey about early autism studies. Autism. Scholar
  6. Georgiades, S., Boyle, M., Szatmari, P., Hanna, S., Duku, E., Zwaigenbaum, L., et al. (2014). Modeling the phenotypic architecture of autism symptoms from time of diagnosis to age 6. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(12), 3045–3055. Scholar
  7. Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC). (2017). 2016–2017 Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee Strategic Plan For Autism Spectrum Disorder. Retreived from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee website
  8. Jivraj, J., Sacrey, L. A., Newton, A., Nicholas, D., & Zwaigenbaum, L. (2014). Assessing the influence of researcher-partner involvement on the process and outcomes of participatory research in autism spectrum disorder and neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review. Autism, 18(7), 782–793. Scholar
  9. National Institutes of Health. (2017). Research portfolio online reporting tools (RePORT): RePORTER manual. (12/19/2017 ed., Vol. 7.24.0).Google Scholar
  10. Ncbi Resource Coordinators. (2017). Database Resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Research, 45(D1), D12–D17, Scholar
  11. Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T. (2014a). Views on researcher-community engagement in autism research in the United Kingdom: a mixed-methods study. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109946. Scholar
  12. Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T. (2014b). What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom. Autism, 18(7), 756–770. Scholar
  13. Smith, T., Iadarola, S., Mandell, D. S., Harwood, R., & Kasari, C. (2017). Community-partnered research with urban school districts that serve children with autism spectrum disorder. Academic Pediatrics, 17(6), 614–619. Scholar
  14. Yusuf, A., & Elsabbagh, M. (2015). At the cross-roads of participatory research and biomarker discovery in autism: the need for empirical data. BMC Medical Ethics, 16(1), 88. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas W. Frazier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Geraldine Dawson
    • 2
  • Donna Murray
    • 1
  • Andy Shih
    • 3
  • Jessica Snyder Sachs
    • 4
  • Angela Geiger
    • 4
  1. 1.Science DepartmentAutism SpeaksNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Global Autism Public HealthAutism SpeaksNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Autism SpeaksNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations