Do Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Benefit from Structural Alignment When Constructing Categories?
Individuals with ASD seem to construct categories via processes different to typically developing individuals. We examined whether individuals with ASD engage in structural alignment of exemplars when constructing categories. We taught children with ASD and typically developing children novel nouns for either single or multiple exemplars, and then examined their extensions of the learned nouns to objects that were either a perceptual or conceptual match to the original exemplar(s). Results indicated that, unlike typically developing participants, those with ASD gained no benefit from seeing multiple exemplars of the category and, thus, did not appear to engage in structural alignment in their formation of categories. However, they demonstrated superior performance compared to typically developing children when presented with a single exemplar.
KeywordsAutism ASD Category learning Structural alignment Language learning
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council.
SS conceived of the study, collected the data, designed the study, coordinated and drafted the manuscript; AK contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript; JPM contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of the data, and drafting the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word: On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Craig, F., Margari, F., Legrottaglie, A. R., Palumbi, R., de Giambattista, C., & Margari, L. (2016). A review of executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1191–1202.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fay, W. H., & Schuler, A. L. (1980). Emerging Language in autistic children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
- Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
- Gentner, D. (1982). A study of early word meaning using artificial objects: What looks like a jiggy but acts like a zimbo? In J. Gardner (Ed.), Readings in developmental psychology. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
- Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195–235). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., Jr. DiLavore, P. C., Pickles, A., & Rutter, M. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 30, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen scales of early learning: AGS edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.Google Scholar
- Plaisted, K. C. (2000). Aspects of autism that theory of mind cannot explain. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schuler, A. L., & Bormann, C. (1982). The interrelations between cognitive and communicative development. In C. E. Johnson & C. L. Thew. In Proceedings of the second international congress for the study of child language. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
- Tager-Flusberg, H. (1985a). Basic level and superordinate level categorization in autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 450–469.Google Scholar