Assessing Children’s Responses to Interparental Conflict: Validation and Short Scale Development of SIS and CPIC-Properties Scales
The Children’s Perception of the Interparental Conflict Scale (CPIC) and The Security in the Interparental Subsystem (SIS) are two widely used scales capturing (a) children’s perception of the interparental conflict properties and (b) children’s reactions to the conflict. The aims of this study were to validate the part of CPIC measuring children’s perception of the conflict (CPIC-properties) and a modified SIS-version in a Scandinavian context and to develop concise short versions of the scales. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to analyze the underlying factor structure of the full and short versions of the scales in a sample of N = 393 children and youth aged 10–15 years old (M age = 11.1, SD = 0.5; 52.2% girls). Regression analyses were used in creating the short scales and in investigating the predictive strengths of the short versions. The full and short versions of the CPICproperties and the modified SIS had excellent fit according to a two level model (CPICproperties) and a three-level model (modified SIS). The CPIC-properties was reduced from 25 items to 17 items and the modified SIS was reduced from 38 items to 17 items. The internal consistencies of both long and short versions were satisfactory. The predictive strengths of the short subscales were comparable to the full subscales’. The findings support the validity of the full and short versions of the CPIC-properties and the modified SIS. The advantages of the short versions are discussed; these scales should be validated in future studies.
KeywordsInterparental conflict Children’s reactions and perceptions Confirmatory factor analysis Short scale development
This study was funded by the The Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs and the Research Council of Norway (grant number: 250642)
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics and Consent Statement
The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics “REC” in Norway approved the study (Protocol number: 2015/1374). Participation in the study was voluntary and both parents had to provide a written informed consent in order to let their children participate. The children were provided information about the study in a separate letter.
- Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1996). Emotional security as a regulatory process in normal development and the development of psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 123–139.Google Scholar
- Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children: An emotional security perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader Internalising and Externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests in multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). London: LEA.Google Scholar
- Holøien, A. M., Zachrisen, O. O., & Holseter, A. M. R. (2016). Befolkningens utdanningsnivå. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/utniv. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
- Kitterød, R. H. (2012). Foreldrenes tidsbruk: Fedre deltar mer i husarbeid og omsorg [Time usage: Fathers participate more in household chores and caregiving]. Retrieved August 30, 2017, Samfunnsspeilet, 26(4), 56–63. http://www.ssb.no/kultur-og-fritid/artikler-og-publikasjoner/fedredeltar-mer-i-husarbeid-og-omsorg. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
- Kitterød, R. H., & Rønsen, M. (2012). Kvinner i arbeid ute og hjemme: Endring og ulikhet [Women's paid and unpaid work: Changes and disparities]. In A. L. Ellingsæter & K. Widerberg (Eds.), Velferdsstatens familier. Nye sosiologiske perspektiver [The families of the welfare state. New sociological perspectives] (pp. 161–190). Gyldendal Akademisk: Oslo.Google Scholar
- Magnus, P., Birke, C., Vejrup, K., Haugan, A., Alsaker, E., Daltveit, A. K., Handal, M., Haugen, M., Høiseth, G., Knudsen, G. P., Paltiel, L., Schreuder, P., Tambs, K., Vold, L., & Stoltenberg, C. (2016). Cohort profile update: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(2), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malik, K. (2014). Human development report 2014 sustaining human Progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report Office. New York.Google Scholar
- Moura, O., dos Santos, R. A., Rocha, M., & Matos, P. M. (2010). Children’s perception of Interparental conflict scale (CPIC): Factor structure and invariance across adolescents and emerging adults. International Journal of Testing, 10, 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.487964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nigg, J. T., Nikolas, M., Miller, T., Burt, S. A., Klump, K. L., & von Eye, A. (2009). Factor structure of the children’s perception of Interparental conflict scale for studies of youths with externalizing behavior problems. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 450–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016564.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Norway. (2018). Kindergartens, final figures. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/en/utdanning/statistikker/barnehager. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.