Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 731–741 | Cite as

Behavioral Couples Treatment for Substance Use Disorder: Secondary Effects on the Reduction of Youth Internalizing Symptoms

  • Michelle L. KelleyEmail author
  • Adrian J. Bravo
  • Abby L. Braitman
Article

Abstract

This study examined the secondary effects of Behavioral Couples Treatment (BCT) for parents with substance use disorder on youth reports of internalizing symptoms (i.e., depressive and anxiety symptoms). Participants were 59 triads (father, mothers, and youth; 32 girls, 27 boys) in which one or both parents met criteria for drug or alcohol use disorder (or both). Mothers, fathers, and youth completed pretreatment, post-intervention, and 6-month post-intervention follow-up assessments. Two piecewise latent growth models examined whether number of sessions attended was associated with parents’ relationship satisfaction or its growth over time, and in turn if parents’ relationship satisfaction was uniquely associated with youth depressive/anxiety symptoms or their growth over time. A significant indirect effect at post-intervention revealed the number of sessions attended contributed to decreases in youth depressive symptoms via increases in mothers’ and fathers’ relationship satisfaction. Mothers’ relationship satisfaction uniquely mediated the relationship between number of sessions attended and youth depressive symptoms at post-intervention. With regards to fathers, there was a non-significant trend such that increases in sessions attended was associated with decreases in youth depressive symptoms post- intervention via increasing relationship satisfaction among fathers. Findings suggest that BCT may have protective secondary effects in reducing youth reports of depressive symptoms among couples in which one or both parents have substance use disorder.

Keywords

Substance abuse treatment Relationship satisfaction Youth depressive symptoms Youth anxiety symptoms 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01 DA024740).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board at the participating institution. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Parents gave written consent for themselves and their children; youth gave verbal assent.

References

  1. Andreas, J. B., & O’Farrell, T. J. (2007). Longitudinal associations between fathers’ heavy drinking patterns and children’s psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10802–006–9067-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashery, R. S., & McAuliffe, W. E. (1992). Implementation issues and techniques in randomized trials of outpatient psychosocial treatments for drug abusers: Recruitment of subjects. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 18, 305–329. doi: 10.3109/00952999209026069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonds, D., & Gondoli, D. M. (2007). Examining the process by which marital adjustment affects maternal warmth: The role of coparenting support as a mediator. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 288–296. doi: 10.1037/0893–3200.21.2.28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bountress, K., & Chassin, L. (2015). Risk for behavior problems in children of parents with substance use disorders. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 275–286. doi: 10.1037/ort0000063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock, R. L., & Kochanska, G. (2015). Decline in the quality of family relationships predicts escalation in children’s internalizing symptoms from middle to late childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 1295–1308. doi: 10.1007/s10802–015–0008-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, K. M., & Onken, L. S. (2005). Behavioral therapies for drug abuse. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1452–1460. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1452.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Marital conflict and children: An emotional security perspective. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2004). Toward an integration of family systems and developmental psychopathology approaches. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 477–481. doi: 10.1017/0S0954579404004626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DiNitto, D. M., Webb, D. K., & Rubin, A. (2002). The effectiveness of an integrated treatment approach for clients with dual diagnoses. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 621–641. doi: 10.1177/1049731502012005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drapkin, M. L., McCrady, B. S., Swingle, J. M., & Epstein, E. E. (2005). Exploring bidirectional couple violence in a clinical sample of female alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 213–217. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emery, R. E. (1999). Marriage, divorce, and children’s adjustment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 352–370. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epstein, E. E., McCrady, B. S., Morgan, T. J., Cook, S. M., Kugler, G., & Ziedonis, D. (2007). Couples treatment for drug-dependent males: Preliminary efficacy of a stand along outpatient model. Addictive Behaviors & Their Treatment., 6, 21–37. doi: 10.1097/01.adt.0000210075.46370.84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63, 591–601. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2010). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-patient Edition (SCID-I/NP). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9280.2007.01882.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaunt, R., & Scott, J. (2014). Parents’ involvement in childcare: Do parental and work identities matter? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 475–489. doi: 10.1177/0361684314533484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homish, G. G., Leonard, K. E., & Cornelius, J. R. (2008). Illicit drug use and marital satisfaction. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 279–291. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.09.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hussong, A. M., Flora, D. B., Curran, P. J., Chassin, L. A., & Zucker, R. A. (2008). Defining risk heterogeneity for internalizing symptoms among children of alcoholic parents. Developmental Psychopathology, 20, 165–193. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kane, P., & Garber, J. (2004). The relations among depression in fathers, children’s psychopathology, and father-child conflict: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 339–360. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.03.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Patterns of marital conflict predict children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 29, 940–950. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.29.6.940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kearney, M. H., Murphy, S., & Rosenbaum, M. (1994). Mothering on crack cocaine: A grounded theory analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 351–361. doi: 10.1016/0277–9536(94)90405–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelley, M. L., Klostermann, K., Doane, A., Mignone, T., Lam, W. K. K., Fals-Stewart, W., & Padilla, M. A. (2010). The case for examining and treating the combined effects of parental drug use and interparental violence on children in their homes. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelley, M. L., D’Lima, G. M., Henson, J. M., & Cotton, C. (2014). Substance-abusing mothers and fathers’ willingness to allow their children to receive mental health treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 47, 106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.02.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelley, M. L., Bravo, A. J., Braitman, A. L., Lawless, A. K., & Lawrence, H. R. (2016). Behavioral couples treatment for substance use disorder: Secondary effects on the reduction of risk for child abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 62, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly, S., Epstein, E. E., & McCrady, B. S. (2004). Pretreatment attrition from couple therapy for male drug abusers. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30, 1–19. doi: 10.1081/ADA-120029861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Klostermann, K., Kelley, M. L., Mignone, T., Pusateri, L., & Wills, K. (2011). Behavioral couples therapy for substance abusers: Where do we go from here? Substance Use & Misuse, 46, 1502–1509. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.576447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI): Technical manual update. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems Inc..Google Scholar
  32. Kownacki, R. J., & Shadish, W. R. (1999). Does alcoholics anonymous work? The results from a meta-analysis of controlled experiments. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 1897–1916. doi: 10.3109/10826089909039431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lester, B. M., Andreozzi, L., & Appiah, L. (2004). Substance use during pregnancy: time for policy to catch up with research. Harm Reduction. Journal, 1, 5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-1-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2011). Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 75–79. doi: 10.1002/cpp.693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luthar, S. S., Cushing, G., Merikangas, K. R., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1998). Multiple jeopardy: Risk and protective factors among addicted mothers’ offspring. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCrady, B. S., Epstein, E. E., Cook, S., Jensen, N., & Hildebrandt, T. (2009). A randomized trial of individual and couple behavioral alcohol treatment for women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 243–256. doi: 10.1037/a0014686.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289–302. doi: 10.2307/1129720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. Seventh edition. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  39. O’Farrell, T. J., & Clements, K. (2012). Review of outcome research on marital and family therapy in treatment for alcoholism. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 122–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1752–0606.2011.00242.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Farrell, T. J., & Fals-Stewart, W. (2006). Behavioral couples therapy for alcoholism and drug abuse. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 271–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00919131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schumm, J. A., & O’Farrell, T. J. (2013). Families and addiction. In P. M. Miller (Ed.), Principles of Addiction: Comprehensive Addictive Behaviors and Disorders, 1 (pp. 301–312). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Serec, M., Švab, I., Kolšek, M., Švab, V., Moesgen, D., & Klein, M. (2012). Health-related lifestyle, physical and mental health in children of alcoholic parents. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31, 861–870. doi: 10.1111/j.1465–3362.2012.00424.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, T., Linnemeyer, R., Scalise, D., & Hamilton, J. (2013). Barriers to outpatient mental health treatment for children and adolescents: Parental perspectives. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 24, 73–92. doi: 10.1080/08975353.2013.792203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. doi: 10.2307/350547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stover, C. S., Easton, C. J., & McMahon, T. J. (2013). Parenting of men with co-occurring intimate partner violence and substance abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2290–2314. doi: 10.1177/0886260512475312.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. doi: 10.1177/019251396017003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. VanDeMark, N. R., Russell, L. A., O’Keefe, M., Finkelstein, N., Noether, C. D., & Gampel, J. C. (2005). Children of mothers with histories of substance abuse, mental illness, and trauma. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 445–459. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Varela, R. E., & Biggs, B. K. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) across samples of Mexican, Mexican American, and European American children: A preliminary investigation. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 19, 67–80. doi: 10.1080/10615800500499727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vu, C. T., & Christensen, A. (2003). Methodology of outcome studies in couple therapy: Analysis and recommendations. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association. Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilens, T. E., Biederman, J., Bredin, E., Hahesy, A. L., Abrantes, A., Neft, D., …Aencer, T. J. (2002). A family study of the high-risk children of opioid- and alcohol-dependent parents. The American Journal on Addictions, 11, 41–51. doi:  10.1080/10550490252801620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle L. Kelley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adrian J. Bravo
    • 1
  • Abby L. Braitman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations