Advertisement

Temperature dependency of activity of nano-catalysts on La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathode of solid oxide fuel cells

  • Ali Soltanizade
  • Alireza BabaeiEmail author
  • Abolghasem Ataie
  • Seyed Vahidreza Seyed-Vakili
Research Article
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Fuel cells

Abstract

In this study, Ag-ceria, Co-ceria, and Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3 nano-catalysts were introduced onto the structure of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathode of solid oxide fuel cells through infiltration technique and the electrochemical features of the infiltrated cathodes were examined by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and analysis of distribution of relaxation times in the temperature range of 500–800 °C. The results revealed that Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3 exhibits considerable promoting behavior in the upper portion of the studied temperature range, while Co-ceria demonstrates significant catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction at lower temperatures probably due to the active valence exchange of cobalt species in the spinel structure of cobalt oxide. Analysis of distribution of relaxation times revealed that low frequency arc of the impedance spectra is effectively hampered as a result of Ag-ceria and Co-ceria infiltration. Cathodic polarization of the infiltrated cells showed stable performance of the infiltrated electrodes over 50 h at 700 °C.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

LSCF SOFC Co-infiltration Nano-catalyst DRT 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge University of Tehran (Grant No. 810729920/6/02) and Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (Grant No. 108038) for their financial supports.

References

  1. 1.
    Li M, Sun Z, Yang W, Hong T, Zhu Z, Zhang Y, Wu X, Xia C (2017) Mechanism for the enhanced oxygen reduction reaction of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 − δ by strontium carbonate. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Y, Gemmen R, Liu X (2010) Oxygen reduction and transportation mechanisms in solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J Power Sources 195:3345–3358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi J-J, Park D-S, Seong B-G, Bae H-Y (2012) Low-temperature preparation of dense (Gd, Ce)O2 − δ–Gd2O3 composite buffer layer by aerosol deposition for YSZ electrolyte-based SOFC. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:9809–9815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nie L, Liu M, Zhang Y, Liu M (2010) La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 − δ cathodes infiltrated with samarium-doped cerium oxide for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 195:4704–4708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu Y, Bi J, Chi B, Pu J, Jian L (2016) Effects of impregnating palladium on catalytic performance of LSCF-GDC composite cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:6486–6492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mostafavi E, Babaei A, Ataie A (2015) Synthesis of nano-Structured La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 perovskite by co-precipitation method. J Ultrafine Grained Nanostruct Mater 48:45–52Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mostafavi E, Babaei A, Ataie A (2015) La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 perovskite cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: a comparative study. Iran J Hydrogen Fuel Cell 1:239–246Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X, Zhang H, Liu X (2014) High performance La2NiO4 + δ-infiltrated (La0.6Sr0.4)0.995Co0.2Fe0.8O3 − δ cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 269:412–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu M, Ding D, Blinn K, Li X, Nie L, Liu M (2012) Enhanced performance of LSCF cathode through surface modification. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:8613–8620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dowd RP, Lee S, Fan Y, Gerdes K (2016) Engineering the solid oxide fuel cell electrocatalyst infiltration technique for industrial use. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:14971–14981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seyed-Vakili SV, Graves CR, Babaei A, Heshmati-Manesh S, Mogensen MB (2017) Performance improvement of an inhomogeneous cathode by infiltration. Fuel Cells 17:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang SP (2012) Nanoscale and nano-structured electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells by infiltration: advances and challenges. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:449–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu Y, Mori M, Funahashi Y, Fujishiro Y, Hirano A (2007) Development of micro-tubular SOFCs with an improved performance via nano-Ag impregnation for intermediate temperature operation. Electrochem Commun 9:1918–1923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sakito Y, Hirano A, Imanishi N, Takeda Y, Yamamoto O, Liu Y (2008) Silver infiltrated La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 182:476–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simner SP, Anderson MD, Coleman JE, Stevenson JW (2006) Performance of a novel La(Sr)Fe(Co)O3–Ag SOFC cathode. J Power Sources 161:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mori M, Liu Y, Itoh T (2009) La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 − δ current collectors via Ag infiltration for microtubular solid oxide fuel cells with intermediate temperature operation. J Electrochem Soc 156:B1182–B1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pi S-H, Lee J-W, Lee S-B, Lim T-H, Park S-J, Park C-O, Song R-H (2014) Performance and durability of anode-supported flat-tubular solid oxide fuel cells with Ag-infiltrated cathodes. J Nanosci Nanotechno 14:7668–7673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seyed-Vakili SV, Babaei A, Ataie M, Heshmati-Manesh S, Abdizadeh H (2018) Enhanced performance of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 cathode for solid oxide fuel cells by co-infiltration of metal and ceramic precursors. J Alloy Compd 737:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mogensen M, Sammes NM, Tompsett GA (2000) Physical, chemical and electrochemical properties of pure and doped ceria. Solid State Ionics 129:63–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ai N, Chen K, Jiang SP (2013) A fundamental study of infiltrated CeO2 and (Gd, Ce)O2 nanoparticles on the electrocatalytic activity of Pt cathodes of solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ionics 233:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trovarelli A (1996) Catalytic properties of ceria and CeO2-containing materials. Catal Rev 38:439–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reed K, Cormack A, Kulkarni A, Mayton M, Sayle D, Klaessig F, Stadler B (2014) Exploring the properties and applications of nanoceria: is there still plenty of room at the bottom? Environ Sci 1:390–405Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamahara K, Jacobson CP, Visco SJ, Zhang X-F, De Jonghe LC (2005) Thin film SOFCs with cobalt-infiltrated cathodes. Solid State Ionics 176:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Imanishi N, Ohno R, Murata K, Hirano A, Takeda Y, Yamamoto O, Yamahara K (2009) LSM–YSZ cathode with infiltrated cobalt oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles. Fuel Cells 9:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He Y, Fan L, Afzal M, Singh M, Zhang W, Zhao Y, Li J, Zhu B (2016) Cobalt oxides coated commercial Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3 − δ as high performance cathode for low-temperature SOFCs. Electrochim Acta 191:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu W, Wang X, Liu Z, Zhao Z, Ou D, Tu B, Cheng M (2014) Influence of deposition temperature of GDC interlayer deposited by RF magnetron sputtering on anode-supported SOFC. Fuel Cells 14:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ding X, Zhu W, Gao X, Hua G, Li J (2015) Enhanced SOFC cathode performance by infiltrating Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3 − δ nanoparticles for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Fuel Process Technol 135:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wan TH, Saccoccio M, Chen C, Ciucci F (2015) Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools. Electrochim Acta 184:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Graves C (2012) RAVDAV Data Analysis Software, Version 0.9. 7. Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nielsen J, Jacobsen T, Wandel M (2011) Impedance of porous IT-SOFC LSCF: CGO composite cathodes. Electrochim Acta 56:7963–7974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hildenbrand N, Boukamp BA, Nammensma P, Blank DH (2011) Improved cathode/electrolyte interface of SOFC. Solid State Ionics 192:12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stern KH (1972) High temperature properties and decomposition of inorganic salts part 3, nitrates and nitrites. J Phys Chem Ref Data 1:747–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu X-L, Chen Z-H, Li Y, Chen W-K, Li J-Q (2009) Bulk and surface properties of spinel Co3O4 by density functional calculations. Surf Sci 603:653–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wachsman E, Kan C (2009) Identifying drivers of catalytic activity through systematic surface modification of cathode materials. ECS Trans 16:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ai N, Jiang SP, Lü Z, Chen K, Su W (2010) Nanostructured (Ba, Sr)(Co, Fe)O3 − δ impregnated (La, Sr) MnO3 cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 157:B1033–B1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li Y, Gerdes K, Horita T, Liu X (2013) Surface exchange and bulk diffusivity of LSCF as SOFC cathode: electrical conductivity relaxation and isotope exchange characterizations. J Electrochem Soc 160:F343–F350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kuklja M, Kotomin EA, Merkle R, Mastrikov YA, Maier J (2013) Combined theoretical and experimental analysis of processes determining cathode performance in solid oxide fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:5443–5471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations