Advertisement

Building thermally stable supercapacitors using temperature-responsive separators

  • Han Jiang
  • Robert K. Emmett
  • Mark E. RobertsEmail author
Research Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Thermal runaway is posing big threat towards common electrochemical devices, such as lithium ion batteries and supercapacitors. It is caused by heat accumulated within electrochemical device and can cause devices to lose functionality, shorten service-life, or even cause hazardous fires and explosions. One effective approach to tackle thermal runaway is to break the electrochemical reaction Arrhenius thermal loop by introducing reaction inhibiting components into the system. Herein, through facile wet casting method, a temperature responsive polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) was cast into thin film and sandwiched in between polypropylene (PP) to make into a temperature responsive separator. It was found that once the temperature rose to 70 °C, instead of increasing in capacitance like in the control, PNIPAM-included batches decreased in capacitance. This capacitance reduction was mainly contributed by increased charge transfer resistance, which was caused by the sol–gel transition and precipitating PNIPAM chains residing upon PP membrane. A similar capacitance reduction was also observed for the ferricyanide redox system. Further investigation also revealed thicker PNIPAM films exhibited enhanced capacitance reduction and scan rate dependency. Temperature responsive polymer separators may prove to be an effective method to suppress high temperature electrochemical reactions and thus offer promise to reversible, thermally stabilized electrochemical devices.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Stimuli-responsive materials PNIPAM Separator Sol–gel transition Temperature dependent properties Supercapacitor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank George Wetzel and Kim Ivey at advanced materials research lab for the helps of characterizations and department of materials science and engineering, department of chemical and biomolecular engineering of Clemson University for funding support.

Supplementary material

10800_2018_1278_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (447 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 446 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Zuo X, Zhu J, Müller-Buschbaum P, Cheng Y-J (2017) Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: a chronicle perspective review. Nano Energy 31:113–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    González A, Goikolea E, Barrena JA, Mysyk R (2016) Review on supercapacitors: technologies and materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:1189–1206 (Supplement C)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patrice Simon YG, Bruce Dunn (2014) Where do batteries end supercapacitors begin? Science 343:1210–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodenough JB, Park K-S (2013) The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc 135(4):1167–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ouyang M, Ren D, Lu L, Li J, Feng X, Han X, Liu G (2015) Overcharge-induced capacity fading analysis for large format lithium-ion batteries with LiyNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 + LiyMn2O4 composite cathode. J Power Sources 279:626–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Q, Ping P, Zhao X, Chu G, Sun J, Chen C (2012) Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J Power Sources 208:210–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kötz R, Ruch PW, Cericola D (2010) Aging and failure mode of electrochemical double layer capacitors during accelerated constant load tests. J Power Sources 195(3):923–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bohlen O, Kowal J, Sauer DU (2007) Ageing behaviour of electrochemical double layer capacitors. J Power Sources 172(1):468–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang LL, Zhao X (2009) Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 38(9):2520–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azaïs P, Duclaux L, Florian P, Massiot D, Lillo-Rodenas M-A, Linares-Solano A, Peres J-P, Jehoulet C, Béguin F (2007) Causes of supercapacitors ageing in organic electrolyte. J Power Sources 171(2):1046–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kötz R, Hahn M, Gallay R (2006) Temperature behavior and impedance fundamentals of supercapacitors. J Power Sources 154(2):550–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kubota K, Fujishige S, Ando I (1990) Solution properties of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) in water. Polym J 22(1):15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stuart MA, Huck WT, Genzer J, Muller M, Ober C, Stamm M, Sukhorukov GB, Szleifer I, Tsukruk VV, Urban M, Winnik F, Zauscher S, Luzinov I, Minko S (2010) Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat Mater 9(2):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boutris C, Chatzi EG, Kiparissides C (1997) Characterization of the LCST behaviour of aqueous poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) solutions by thermal and cloud point techniques. Polymer 38(10):2567–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heskins M, Guillet JE (1968) Solution properties of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide). J Macromol Sci Chem 2(8):1441–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schild HG (1992) Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide): experiment, theory and application. Prog Polym Sci 17(2):163–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang G, Wu C (2009) Quartz crystal microbalance studies on conformational change of polymer chains at interface. Macromol Rapid Commun 30(4–5):328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yanjie Zhang SF, Laura B, Sagle Y, Cho DE, Bergbreiter PS, Cremer (2007) Effects of Hofmeister anions on the LCST of PNIPAM as a function of molecular weight. J Phys Chem C:8916–8924Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu X, Winnik CY,FM, Leckband D (2006) End-grafted low-molecular-weight PNIPAM does not collapse above the LCST. Langmuir 23:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kyle N. Plunkett XZ, Moore JS, Deborah E, Leckband (2006) PNIPAM chain collapse depends on the molecular weight and grafting density. Langmuir 22:4259–4266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yanjie Zhang SF, David E, Bergbreiter PS, Cremer (2005) Specific ion effects on the water solubility of macromolecules: PNIPAM and the Hofmeister series. J Am Chem Soc 127:14505–14510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Y, Furyk S, Sagle LB, Cho Y, Bergbreiter DE, Cremer PS (2007) Effects of Hofmeister anions on the LCST of PNIPAM as a function of molecular weight. J Phys Chem C 111(25):8916–8924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhu X, Yan C, Winnik F, Leckband D (2007) End-grafted low-molecular-weight PNIPAM does not collapse above the LCST. Langmuir 23(1):162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elashnikov R, Slepička P, Rimpelova S, Ulbrich P, Švorčík V, Lyutakov O (2016) Temperature-responsive PLLA/PNIPAM nanofibers for switchable release. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 72:293–300Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen M, Li YF, Besenbacher F (2014) Electrospun nanofibers-mediated on-demand drug release. Adv Healthcare Mater 3(11):1721–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang J, Sutti A, Wang X, Lin T (2011) Fast responsive and morphologically robust thermo-responsive hydrogel nanofibres from poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and POSS crosslinker. Soft Matter 7(9):4364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu H, Liao J, Zhao Y, Sotto A, Zhu J, van der Bruggen B, Gao C, Shen J (2018) Bioinspired dual stimuli-responsive membranes with enhanced gating ratios and reversible performances for water gating. J Membr Sci 564:53–61Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tu Y, Peng F, Sui X, Men Y, White PB, van Hest JC, Wilson DA (2017) Self-propelled supramolecular nanomotors with temperature-responsive speed regulation. Nat Chem 9(5):480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thakur N, Baji A, Ranganath AS (2017) Thermoresponsive electrospun fibers for water harvesting applications. Appl Surf Sci 433:1018–1024Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen Z, Hsu P-C, Lopez J, Li Y, To JWF, Liu N, Wang C, Andrews Sean C, Liu J, Cui Y, Bao Z (2016) Fast and reversible thermoresponsive polymer switching materials for safer batteries. Nat Energy 1(1):15009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Otsuki M, Ogino T, Amine K (2006) Investigation of flame-retardant additives for safety usage of lithium-ion batteries. ECS Trans 1(24):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alaa Hijazi PK, Bideaux E, Venet P, Clerc G, Michael Di Loreto (2012) Thermal network model of supercapacitors stack. IRE Trans Ind Electron 59 (2):979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Basu S, Hariharan KS, Kolake SM, Song T, Sohn DK, Yeo T (2016) Coupled electrochemical thermal modelling of a novel Li-ion battery pack thermal management system. Appl Energy 181:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheeney Haj Ichia L, Sharabi G, Willner I (2002) Control of the electronic properties of thermosensitive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) and Au-nano-particle/poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) composite hydrogels upon phase transition. Adv Funct Mater 12(1):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang H, Liu Z, Chandran BK, Deng J, Yu J, Qi D, Li W, Tang Y, Zhang C, Chen X (2015) Self-protection of electrochemical storage devices via a thermal reversible sol-gel transition. Adv Mater 27(37):5593–5598. 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ji W, Wang F, Liu D, Qian J, Cao Y, Chen Z, Yang H, Ai X (2016) Building thermally stable Li-ion batteries using a temperature-responsive cathode. J Mater Chem A 4(29):11239–11246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kelly JC, Pepin M, Huber DL, Bunker BC, Roberts ME (2012) Reversible control of electrochemical properties using thermally-responsive polymer electrolytes. Adv Mater 24(7):886–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kelly JC, Huber DL, Price AD, Roberts ME (2015) Switchable electrolyte properties and redox chemistry in aqueous media based on temperature-responsive polymers. J Appl Electrochem 45(8):921–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kelly JC, Gupta R, Roberts ME (2015) Responsive electrolytes that inhibit electrochemical energy conversion at elevated temperatures. J Mater Chem A 3(7):4026–4034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kelly JC, Degrood NL, Roberts ME (2015) Li-ion battery shut-off at high temperature caused by polymer phase separation in responsive electrolytes. Chem Commun 51(25):5448–5451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yang H, Leow WR, Chen X (2018) Thermal-responsive polymers for enhancing safety of electrochemical storage devices. Adv Mater 30:1704347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shi Y, Ha H, Al-Sudani A, Ellison CJ, Yu G (2016) Thermoplastic elastomer-enabled smart electrolyte for thermoresponsive self-protection of electrochemical energy storage devices. Adv Mater 28(36):7921–7928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shen J, Han K, Martin EJ, Wu YY, Kung MC, Hayner CM, Shull KR, Kung HH (2014) Upper-critical solution temperature (UCST) polymer functionalized graphene oxide as thermally responsive ion permeable membrane for energy storage devices. J Mater Chem A 2(43):18204–18207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang P, Wang J, Sheng W, Wang F, Zhang J, Zhu F, Zhuang X, Jordan R, Schmidt OG, Feng X (2018) Thermoswitchable on-chip microsupercapacitors: one potential self-protection solution for electronic devices. Energy Environ Sci 11:1717–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemical & Biomolecular EngineeringClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations