Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 405–413 | Cite as

Effect of carbon properties on the electrochemical performance of carbon-based air electrodes for rechargeable zinc–air batteries

Research Article
  • 164 Downloads

Abstract

The carbon-based air electrode for zinc–air batteries has its advantages, such as high electrical conductivity and porosity; however, its stability is poor, affecting the cycle life of batteries. Degradation of the electrode can be caused by carbon corrosion during charging at high voltage. In this study, air electrodes were prepared with several types of carbon materials. The electrochemical performances of the electrodes were measured to investigate the effects of the corrosion properties of several carbons with different physical properties. The initial electrochemical performance of the carbon black-electrode was the best due to its high specific surface area. In contrast, the long-term cyclabilities of graphite1- and graphite2-electrodes were superior. Both electrodes exhibited high crystallinity and high uniformity in terms of the particle size and shape. Considering durability, the graphite1-electrode was deemed the most suitable as an air electrode for zinc–air batteries.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Rechargeable zinc–air battery Air electrode Catalyst support Carbon corrosion Cycleability Carbon’s physical properties 

Supplementary material

10800_2018_1173_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Linde D, Reddy TB (2001) Handbooks of batteries. McGraw-Hill, NewyorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Y, Dai H (2014) Recent advances in zinc–air batteries. Chem Soc Rev 43(15):5257–5275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sapkota P, Kim H (2009) Zinc–air fuel cell, a potential candidate for alternative energy. J Ind Eng Chem 15(4):445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pei P, Wang K, Ma Z (2014) Technologies for extending zinc–air battery’s cycle life: a review. Appl Energy 128:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu J, Chen B, Kou Y, Liu Z, Chen X, Li Y, Deng Y, Han X, Hu W, Zhong C (2016) Pt-decorated highly porous flower-like Ni particles with high mass activity for ammonia electro-oxidation. J Mater Chem A4:11060–11068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu J, Chen B, Ni Z, Deng Y, Han X, Hu W, Zhong C (2016) Improving the electrocatalytic activity of Pt monolayer catalysts for electrooxidation of methanol, ethanol and ammonia by tailoring the surface morphology of the supporting core. ChemElectroChem 3(4):537–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodenough JB, Kim Y (2009) Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater 22(3):587–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu C, Li F, Ma LP, Cheng HM (2010) Advanced materials for energy storage. Adv Mater 22(8):E28–E62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee B, Choi G, Lee S, Jeong Y, Park Y, Cho D (2017) A Study on explosion and fire risk of lithium-ion and lithium-polymer battery. J Korea Info Commun Soc 42(4):855–863Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li X, Xu N, Li H, Wang M, Zhang L, Qiao J (2017) 3D hollow sphere Co3O4/MnO2-CNTs: its high-performance bi-functional cathode catalysis and application in rechargeable zinc–air battery. Green Energy Environ 2(3):316–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2017.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pang H, Gu P, Zheng M, Zhao Q, Xiao X, Xue XH (2017) Rechargeable zinc–air battery: a promising way to green energy. J Mater Chem A 5:7651–7666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park DW, Kim JW, Lee JK, Lee J (2012) Rechargeable zinc–air energy storage cells providing high power density. Appl Chem Eng 23(4):359–366Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li B, Ge X, Goh FWT, Hor TSA, Geng D, Du G, Zong Y (2015) Co3O4 nanoparticles decorated carbon nanofiber mat as binder-free air-cathode for high performance rechargeable zinc–air batteries. Nanoscale 7(5):1830–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li PC, Hu CC, You TH, Chen PY (2017) Development and characterization of bi-functional air electrodes for rechargeable zinc–air batteries: effects of carbons. Carbon 111:813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Velraj S, Zhu JH (2015) Cycle life limit of carbon-based electrodes for rechargeable metal–air battery application. J Electroanal Chem 736:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lam E, Luong JHT (2014) Carbon materials as catalyst supports and catalysts in the transformation of biomass to fuels and chemicals. ACS Catal 4(10):3393–3410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross PN, Sattler M (1988) The corrosion of carbon black anodes in alkaline electrolyte III. The effect of graphitization on the corrosion resistance of furnace blacks. J Electrochem Soc 135(6):1464–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang X, Li W, Chen Z, Waje M, Yan Y (2006) Durability investigation of carbon nanotube as catalyst support for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources 158(1):154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sumboja A, Ge X, Zheng G, Goh FWT, Hor TSA, Zong Y, Liu Z (2016) Durable rechargeable zinc–air batteries with neutral electrolyte and manganese oxide catalyst. J Power Sources 332:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kinoshita K (1992) Electrochemical oxygen technology. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koninck MD, Manseau P, Marsan B (2007) Preparation and characterization of Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles used as a conductive support for bifunctional CuCo2O4 electrocatalyst. J Electroanal Chem 611(1–2):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neburchilov V, Wang H, Martin JJ, Qu W (2010) A review on air cathodes for zinc–air fuel cells. J Power Sources 195(5):1271–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shepard VR, Smalley YG, Bentz RD (1994) Bifunctional metal–air electrode. US Patent 5,306,579Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eom S, Ahn S, Jeong S (2015) Electrochemical activity of a La0.9Ca0.1Co1−xFexO3 catalyst for a zinc air battery electrode. J Nanomater 16(1):103–108Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morris MC et al (1977) Standard X-ray diffraction powder patterns. Section 14. Data for 68 substances, Inst. for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang W, Nadeau G, Zaghib K, Kinoshita K (2000) Thermal analysis of the oxidation of natural graphite—effect of particle size. Thermochim Acta 351(1–2):85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen XH, Chen CS, Chen Q, Cheng FQ, Zhang G, Chen ZZ (2002) Non-destructive purification of multi-walled carbon nanotubes produced by catalyzed CVD. Mater Lett 57(3):734–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li X, Qu W, Zhang J, Wang H (2011) Electrocatalytic activities of La0.6Ca0.4CoO3 and La0.6Ca0.4CoO3-carbon composites toward the oxygen reduction reaction in concentrated alkaline electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 158(5):A597–A604Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Battery Research CenterKorea Electrotechnology Research Institute (KERI)ChangwonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Electro-Functionality Materials EngineeringUniversity of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Polymer Science and EngineeringPusan National UniversityPusanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations