Usability of virtual reality for basic design education: a comparative study with paper-based design
Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology that is being used in a wide range of fields such as medicine, gaming, psychology and sociology. The use of VR is promising in the field of education and requires investigation, but research on the use of VR in education is still limited. This enables the exploration of new territories, and design education is one of them. Design education, an important part of the curriculum of architecture students who aim to conceptualize problem-solving, is still taught using traditional methodologies with touches of digital technologies. Thus, there is limited research into the implementation of VR. This study proposes using VR in basic design education and focuses on the usability of VR, especially for problem-solving activities. It presents the literature on basic design education of digital approaches, VR technologies, usability criteria and the technology acceptance model. In order to analyse the usability of VR, we conducted an experimental study with 20 first-year interior architecture and architecture students. We found that, statistically, there is a significant difference in terms of ‘the intention to use’ and ‘the perceived enjoyment’ between the VR group and the paper-based group. Moreover, there is, statistically, a difference in effectiveness within the paper-based group and the VR-based group when one compares the success of two types of design problems in the same group. Thus, one can summarize that using VR can strongly enhance problem-solving activities in interior architecture and for architecture students and that one can consider it to be a promising and complementary tool in basic design education.
KeywordsBasic design education Technology acceptance model Usability Virtual reality
This work was supported by the Grant of Science Academy’s Young Scientist Awards Program 2017 (BAGEP), Turkey. The authors would also like to thank the participants of the experiments for their contribution.
- Akin, S., Ergun, O., Surer, E., & Dino, I. G. (2018). An immersive design environment for performance-based architectural design: A BIM-based approach. In Proceedings of the 4th EAI international conference on smart objects and technologies for social good (pp. 306–307). ACM 2018.Google Scholar
- Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2009). Developing a measurement scale for the evaluation of AR-based educational systems. Studies in Informatics and Control,18(2), 137–148.Google Scholar
- Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–191). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Burry, M. (2011). Scripting cultures: Architectural design and programming. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Casakin, H. P. (2007). Metaphors in design problem-solving: Implications for creativity. International Journal of Design,1(2), 21–33.Google Scholar
- Çetinkaya, Ç. (2011). Analysis of design and concept and its impact on basic design education. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe University.Google Scholar
- Costalli, F., Marucci, L., Mori, G., & Partenò, F. (2001). Design criteria for usable web accessible virtual environments. In: Proceedings of international cultural heritage informatics meeting: ICHIM’01 (pp. 413–26). Milan.Google Scholar
- Davis, S., Nesbitt, K., & Nalivaiko, E. (2014). A systematic review of cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on interactive entertainment (pp. 1–9). ACM 2014.Google Scholar
- Denel, B. (1981). Basic design and creative thinking. Ankara: METU Architecture Faculty Press.Google Scholar
- Ding, L., Liew, P., Maher, M., L., Gero, J., S., & Drogemuller, R. (2003). Integrating CAD and 3D virtual worlds using agents and EDM. In M. L. Chiu (Ed.), Proceedings 10th international conference on computer aided architectural design futures (CAAD Futures 2003) (pp. 301–312). Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Google Blocks. (2018). https://vr.google.com/blocks/.
- Google Poly. (2018). https://poly.google.com.
- Güngör, I. H. (2005). Basic design. İstanbul: Patates Publications.Google Scholar
- Heydarian, A., Pantazis, E., Gerber, D., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2015). Use of immersive virtual environments to understand human-building interactions and improve building design. In Conference: Human computer interaction international 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Hou, L., Wang, X., Bernold, L., & Love, P. E. (2013). Using animated augmented reality to cognitively guide assembly. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,27(5), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (1999). A guide to computing statistics with SPSS release 8 for windows. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Kim, M. J., Wang, X., Love, P., Li, H., & Kang, S. -C. (2013) Virtual reality for the built environment: A critical review of recent advances. Journal of Information Technology and Construction, 18(2), 279–305. https://www.itcon.org/paper/2013/14.
- Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- Lanier, J. (1992). Virtual reality: The promise of the future. Interactive Learning International,8(4), 275–279.Google Scholar
- Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory,14, 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, J. R. (1990). Psychometric evaluation of a post-study system usability questionnaire: The PSSUQ (Tech. Report 54.535). Boca Raton, FL: International Business Machines Corp.Google Scholar
- Makaklı, E. S., & Özker, S. (2015). Basic design in architectural education in Turkey. In Paper presented at the ERPA International Congresses on Education, Athens, Greece. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601053.
- McCullough, M., Mitchell, W., & Purcell, P. (Eds.). (1990). The electronic design studio: Architecture, media and knowledge in the computer era. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Neves, A. G., & Duarte, E. (2015). Using virtual environments in basic design education. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference senses and sensibility 2015 (pp. 1–9). Lisbon, Portugal 5–7 October 2015.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, C., Kelly, J., Lehane, E., Livingstone, V., Cotter, B., & Butt, A. (2015). Validation and assessment of a technology familiarity score in patients attending a symptomatic breast clinic. World Journal of Surgery,39(10), 2441–2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3134-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ozsoy, V. (2003). History of fine arts education. Ankara: Gündüz Egitim Publication.Google Scholar
- Portman, M., Natapov, A., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2015). To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,54, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reas, C., & Fry, B. (2014). Processing: A programming handbook for visual designers and artists. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Salama, A. M., & Wilkinson, N. (2007). Design studio pedagogy: Horizons for the future. United Kingdom: The Urban International Press.Google Scholar
- Schon, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications Limited.Google Scholar
- Somak, A., Humar, I., Hossain, M. S., Alhamid, F. M., Hossain, M. A., & Guna, J. (2018). Estimating VR sickness and user experience using different HMD technologies: An evaluation study. Future Generation Computer Systems,94, 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.11.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sopher, H., Gewirtzman, D. F., & Kalay, Y. E. (2018) Use of immersive virtual environment in the design studio. In Proceedings of eCAADe 2018—36th annual conference 17th–21st September 2018, Lodz Poland (pp. 853–862).Google Scholar
- Tenemaza, M., Ramirez, J., & de Antonio, A. (2016). Acceptability of an A2R application: Analysis of correlations between factors in a TAM. In IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality adjunct proceedings. (Online). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.62.
- UEQ. (2018). (Online) https://www.ueq-online.org.
- Varınlıoğlu, G., Halıcı, S., & Alaçam, S. (2015). Computational approaches for basic design education: Pedagogical notes based on an intense student workshop. In XIX congresso da sociedade ibero Americana de Gráfica Digital 2015. Florianopolis. http://doi.org/10.5151/despro-sigradi2015-100267.
- Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- Zelanski, P., & Fisher, M. P. (1996). Design principles and problems. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar