Advertisement

Middle school students’ perceptions of engineers: a case study of Beijing students

  • Min Liu
  • Feng-Kuang ChiangEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate students’ perceptions of engineers and how they vary by grade level and gender. This study proposes an approach to understanding the Chinese students’ perceptions of engineers and the interest preference of middle school students in the way of graphic analysis and questionnaire. This descriptive study incorporated a cross-age design; qualitative data were collected from 390 students in a junior high school in Beijing. Data were analyzed using content analysis, and statistical tests were performed on eight factors. Although students have a basic common perception of engineers, gender differences exist, and there are gender stereotypes and one-sided perceptions of engineers. Most students tend to perceive engineers as males whose work area is limited to a single building. The drawings of students of higher grades are associated with mental activity in the engineering artifacts and processes factors, whereas students’ drawings with the presence of physical activity gradually decline. Students consider engineering to be mental work involving advanced psychological processes such as designing and inventing. Overall, the accuracy and comprehensiveness of students’ perceptions in senior grades is better than that in lower grades. Serious gender stereotypes and the phenomenon of cognitive simplification are present in middle school students’ perceptions of engineers.

Keywords

Engineers Students’ perceptions Middle school students Case study 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by The National Education Science of China “13th Five-Year plan” key research topics of Ministry of Education (Grant No. DCA170309)

References

  1. Barman, C. R., Ostlund, K. L., Gatto, C. C., & Halferty, M. (1997). Fifth grade students’ perceptions about scientists and how they study and use science. In Proceedings of the 1997 annual international conference of the association for the education of teachers in science. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 405 220.Google Scholar
  2. Capobianco, B. M., Deemer, E. D., & Lin, C. (2017). Analyzing predictors of children’s formative engineering identity development. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 44–54.Google Scholar
  3. Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypie images of scientists: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Li, Y., & Chen, M. (2014). Reform and development of international engineering education under the background of new industrial revolution. Research on Higher Engineering Education., 6, 1–5.Google Scholar
  6. Chou, P. N., & Chen, W. F. (2017). Elementary school students’ conceptions of engineers: A drawing analysis study in Taiwan. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 476–488.Google Scholar
  7. Clarebout, G., Depaepe, F., Elen, J., et al. (2007). The use of drawings to assess students’ epistemological beliefs. In 12th European conference for research on learning and instruction. Google Scholar
  8. Chinese Ministry of Education. (2017). Compulsory education primary school science curriculum standards. Retrieved February 6, 2017, from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/201702/t20170215_296305.html?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0.
  9. Douglas, J., Iverson, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.engineeringk12.org/educators/taking_a_closer_look/reports.htm.
  10. Dove, J. E., Everret, L. A., & Preece, R. W. F. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education., 21(5), 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrlen, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children’s conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw-ascientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fralick, B., Keam, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawing to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, L. R., Harnett, J. A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2009). Drawing out student conceptions: Using pupils’ pictures to examine their conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 58). Charlotte, CN: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., Feder, M. A., & Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  17. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. M. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. In Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20–23, 2004.Google Scholar
  18. Li, M. (2015). The application of painting psychological analysis in the selection PLA rugby players. Journal of Pla Institute of Physical Education34(1), 122–123.Google Scholar
  19. Luo, Y. (2015). Research on key qualities of Chinese engineers from the perspective of engineering innovation. Master’s thesis, Beijing Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  20. Lyons, J., & Thomson, S. (2006). Investigating the long-term impact of an engineering-based GK-12 program on students’ perceptions of engineering. In Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Chicago, Illinois (pp. 18–21).Google Scholar
  21. MacPhail, A., & Kinchin, G. (2004). The use of drawings as an evaluative tool: Students’ experiences of sport education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 9(1), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Academies of Engineering. (2004). Ninth annual symposium on frontiers of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  23. Oware, E., Capobianco, B., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2007). Gifted students perceptions of engineers? A study of students in a summer outreach program. In Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii (pp. 24–27).Google Scholar
  24. Pearson, G., & Young, T. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Picker, S., & Berry, H. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plant, E. A., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., et al. (2009). Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Computers & Education, 53(2), 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers, R. S. (1969). A consolidated report on the “Draw-A-Classroom” test: A study of the drawing behavior of children in toronto public schools. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  28. Scherz, Z., & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorenson, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schussler, E., & Winslow, J. (2007). Drawing on students’ knowledge. Science and Children, 44(5), 40–44.Google Scholar
  31. Selvvyn, N., Boraschi, D., & Ozkula, S. M. (2009). Drawing digital pictures: An investigation of primary pupils’ representations of ICT and schools. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 909–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tu, S. (2007). Comprehensive engineering education: Introduction. Research on Higher Engineering Education, (2), 6–13.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). An exploration of elementary school students’ conceptions of learning: A drawing analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 610–617.Google Scholar
  34. Wei, C., & He, M. (2012). The quality structure of applied excellent engineers and its cultivation. Higher Science Education, 1, 36–40.Google Scholar
  35. Wei, Y., & Wang, H. (2008). The application of children’s graphic psychoanalysis in parent–child relationship processing. Journal of Educational Development (Preschool Education), (8), 29–31.Google Scholar
  36. Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, X., & Ji, J. (2012). Stereotypical image of scientists: Research advance and its implications. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Social Science Edition, (6), 5–12.Google Scholar
  39. Wu, X., Ji, J., Shang, X., & Xie, J. (2010). The influence of middle school students’ image of scientists and science museum learning experience. Journal of South China Normal University: Social Science Edition, (5), 58–64.Google Scholar
  40. Wu, Y., & Wu, W. (2013). Engineering technology education: New elements in American K-12 science education framework. Shanghai Education and Research, (1), 20–22.Google Scholar
  41. Yang, J. (2013). A survey of scientists’ image and scientific cognition of primary and middle school students. Master dissertation, Hangzhou Normal University.Google Scholar
  42. Yang, M. (2015). An analysis of self-image characteristics of public security new police based on painting projection technology. China Mental Health Association of College Students Psychological Counseling Professional Committee. Chinese Journal of Mental Health Education—The 12th national college students mental health education and counseling academic exchange conference proceedings.Google Scholar
  43. Yuan, H., & Wang, Z. (2010). The role of graphic psychoanalysis in school mental health education. Business Culture, (7), 229.Google Scholar
  44. Zhang, N., & Zhan, Y. (2014). Comparative study on the image of scientists among the primary and middle school students in Beijing. Science Research, 9(6), 11–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Educational TechnologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Educational Technology, College of EducationShanghai Normal UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations