Identity development in school makerspaces: intentional design
Makerspaces are increasingly popular in K-12 schools, particularly when associated with STEM learning. Many schools are successfully entering the makerspace arena. Others face significant barriers in ideating their design, often resorting to tinkering, or the purchase of commercial kits as resources. At the heart of a makerspace is its intent, as well as anticipated learning outcomes. This paper proposes design as being the process-base of a makerspace, and the transformation of learner identity as being its core learning outcome. The literature is drawn together to present an overview of identity as it relates to learning. It draws on the Funds of Knowledge and Funds of Identity approaches to outline how makerspaces are able to operate as third spaces, drawing together experiences in both formal and informal education. The paper then presents a makerspace design approach that draws together three identity resources, namely material, relational and ideational. Literature on equity-oriented makerspace design and facilitation is drawn upon to describe makerspace design features organised by each type of identity resource. This design can initiate the conversation of educational makerspace designers that supports focused questions about the potential purpose, resourcing, structure and facilitation of school makerspaces.
KeywordsMakerspace Design technology Identity STEM
This research was supported by a Queensland Government Department of Education: Education Horizon Research Grant.
Compliance with ethical standards
Research ethics approval has been granted for this research by CQUniversity and the Queensland Department of Education.
- Agency by Design. (2015). Maker-centred learning and the development of self: Preliminary findings of the agency by design project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
- Ajima, J. (2013). Design make share: An outline for making in the classroom. Design make teach. Retrieved from: http://designmaketeach.com/2013/04/21/design-make-share-an-outline-for-making-in-theclassroom/.
- American Society of Engineering Education. (2016). Envisioning the future of the maker movement: Summit report. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/papers/maker-summit-report.pdf.
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Dillon, J. (2014). ‘It didn’t really change my opinion’: exploring what works, what doesn’t and why in a school science, technology, engineering and mathematics careers intervention. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.865601.Google Scholar
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2014). The Australian Curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/.
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.) Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 71–81).Google Scholar
- Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Greenberg, D. (2016). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 11–44.Google Scholar
- Becker, S. (2015). There’s more than one way to skin a cat: Creating a makerspace on a limited primary school budget. In Proceedings from FabLearn 2015, conference on creativity and fabrication in education. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
- Chu, S., Schlegel, R., Quek, F., Christy, A., & Chen, K. (2017). I make therefore I am: The effects of curriculum-aligned making on children’s self-identity. Paper delivered at CHI, 2017, May 6–11, Denver, CO, USA.Google Scholar
- Coll, C., & Falsafi, L. (2010). Learner identity. An educational and analytical tool La identidad de aprendiz. Una herramienta educativa y analítica. Revista de Educación, 353, 211–233.Google Scholar
- Davis, A. W., & Kappler-Hewitt, K. (2013). Australia’s campfires, caves, and watering holes. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(8), 24.Google Scholar
- Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Doyle, A., Seery, N., Gumaelius, L., Canty, D., & Hartell, E. (2018). Reconceptualising PCK research in D&T education: proposing a methodological framework to investigate enacted practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1.Google Scholar
- Education Services Australia. (2018). Makerspaces. Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from https://www.digitaltechnologieshub.edu.au/teachers/topics/maker-spaces.
- Erete, S., Pinkard, N., Martin, C. K., & Sandherr, J. (2015). Employing narratives to trigger interest in computational activities with inner-city girls. Paper presented at the Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), 2015.Google Scholar
- Galloway, A. (2015). Bringing a Reggio Emilia inspired approach into higher grades-Links to 21st Century learning skills and the maker movement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Victoria.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, J. (2017). Educational makerspaces: Disruptive, educative or neither? New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 14(2), 80–98.Google Scholar
- Gonzales, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing practices. In N. Gonzales, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.Google Scholar
- Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Hira, A., Joslyn, C. H., & Hynes, M. M. (2014, October). Classroom makerspaces: Identifying the opportunities and challenges. In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(2), 148–163.Google Scholar
- Jarrett, K. (2016). Makerspaces and Design Thinking: Perfect Together! Education Digest, 82(4), 50–54.Google Scholar
- Jolly, A. (2014). Six characteristics of a great STEM lesson. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2014/06/17/ctq_jolly_stem.html.
- Kafai, Y., Fields, D., & Searle, K. (2014a). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532–556.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014b). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 241–246). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Kegan, R. (2009). What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning—Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 43–60). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 0034654318779957.Google Scholar
- Kimbell, R. (1994). Tasks in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(3), 241–255.Google Scholar
- Kimbell, R. (2006). Innovative technological performance. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (pp. 159–178). New York, US: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kurti, R., Kurti, D., & Fleming, L. (2014a). The environment and tools of great educational makerspaces. Teacher Librarian, 42(1), 8–12.Google Scholar
- Kurti, R., Kurti, D., & Fleming, L. (2014b). The philosophy of educational makerspaces. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 8–11.Google Scholar
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Leaper, C. (2015). Do I belong?: Gender, peer groups, and STEM achievement. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 166–179.Google Scholar
- Lock, J., dos Santos, L. D. R., Hollohan, P., & Becker, S. (2018). It’s more than just making: Insights into facilitating learning through making. Science Education Journal, 45(2), 10–16.Google Scholar
- Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering and engineering in the classroom. New Hampshire: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.Google Scholar
- Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social context for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Nasir, N. (2012). Racialised identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- New South Wales Department of Education. (n.d.). Makerspaces. Learning for the Future. Retrieved from https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-and-learning/curriculum/learning-for-the-future/learning-with-technology/makerspace.
- Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2014). Self, self-concept, and identity. In M. Leary & J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablix Publishing.Google Scholar
- Peppler, K. A. (2013). STEAM-Powered computing education: Using e-textiles to integrate the arts and STEM. IEEE Computer, 46(9), 3.Google Scholar
- Petrich, M., Wilkinson, K., & Bevan, B. (2013). It looks like fun, but are they learning? In M. Honey & D. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 50–70). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pisarski, A. Y. (2014). Finding a place for the tween: Children & Libraries. The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children, 12(3), 13–16.Google Scholar
- Polman, J. L. (2010). The zone of proximal identity development in apprenticeshiplearning La zona de desarrollo próximo de la identidad en entornos de aprendizaje de oficios. Revista de Educación, 353, 129–155.Google Scholar
- Poole, A. (2016). Digital funds of identity: Funds of knowledge 2.0 for the digital generation? In Proceedings of the European Conference on Education, 2016.Google Scholar
- Qiu, K., Buechley, L., Baafi, E., & Dubow, W. (2013). A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 20–27). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Questacon. (2018). Teacher resource—Makerspace and tinkering activities. The National Science and Technology Centre. Retrieved from https://www.questacon.edu.au/outreach/programmes/questacon-smart-skills-initiative/workshops/resources/teacher-resource-makerspaces-and-tinkering-activities.
- Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Identity that makes a difference: Substantial learning as closing the gap between actual and designated identities. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 37–52.Google Scholar
- Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531.Google Scholar
- Somanath, S., Morrison, L., Hughes, J., Sharlin, E., & Sousa, M. C. (2016). Engaging ‘at-risk’ students through maker culture activities. In Proceedings of the TEI’16: Tenth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. Google Scholar
- Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15.Google Scholar
- Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wardrip, P. S., & Brahms, L. (2015). Learning practices of making: developing a framework for design. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 375–378). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Wardrip, P., Brahms, L., Reich, C., & Carrigan, T. (2016). Making + Learning framework. Retrieved from https://makingandlearning.squarespace.com.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar