To compare changes in endothelial cell count and morphology at 6 months follow-up in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.
Prospective, comparative and open-label study.
All consenting patients between 50 and 75 years of age with uncomplicated cataract underwent either FLACS [Catalys Precision Laser System (OptiMedica Corp.; Abbott Medical Optics)] or conventional phacoemulsification [Bausch + Lomb Stellaris® (Rochester, USA)] based on their preference and were followed up on day 15 and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The endothelial cell count (ECC), % of hexagonal cells and coefficient of variation were noted at baseline and at each follow-up visit and compared between groups.
A total of 187 eyes of 187 patients (n = 98 in phaco vs. n = 89 in FLACS) were enrolled. At 15 days follow-up, there was a significant decline in the endothelial cell count in both groups (187 ± 156 in phaco vs. 193 ± 240 in FLACS, p < 0.001). In subsequent visits, the ECC remained stable (8% decline in phaco vs. 7.7% decline in femto, p = 0.87) till last follow-up at 6 months. The %hexagonal cells also decreased significantly at 15 days post-op (p < 0.001) but did not show any change in subsequent visits. The coefficient of variation in ECC did not change significantly throughout the study period. Eyes with higher endothelial cell count at baseline tended to lose more cells (b = 25.7 cells/mm3, 95% CI 16–35 cells, p = 0.01) irrespective of age and type of surgery.
Both procedures are equally safe with < 10% ECC loss at 6 months. Longer studies are required to determine influence of FLACS on ECC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Grewal DS, Schultz T, Basti S, Dick HB (2016) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery–current status and future directions. Surv Ophthalmol 61(2):103–131
Al-Mohtaseb Z, He X, Yesilirmak N, Waren D, Donaldson KE (2017) Comparison of corneal endothelial cell loss between two femtosecond laser platforms and standard phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg 33(10):708–712
Takács AI, Kovács I, Miháltz K, Filkorn T, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ (2012) Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg 28(6):387–391
Schargus M, Suckert N, Schultz T, Kakkassery V, Dick HB (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without OVD: a prospective intraindividual comparison. J Refract Surg 31(3):146–152
Conrad-Hengerer I, Al Juburi M, Schultz T, Hengerer FH, Dick HB (2013) Corneal endothelial cell loss and corneal thickness in conventional compared with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: three-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(9):1307–1313
Abell RG, Kerr NM, Howie AR, Mustaffa Kamal MAA, Allen PL, Vote BJ (2014) Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(11):1777–1783
Krarup T, Holm LM, la Cour M, Kjaerbo H (2014) Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 92(7):617–622
Day AC, Gore DM, Bunce C, Evans JR (2016) Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:010735
Abell RG, Darian-Smith E, Kan JB, Allen PL, Ewe SYP, Vote BJ (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(1):47–52
Mariacher S, Ebner M, Seuthe A-M, Januschowski K, Ivanescu C, Opitz N et al (2016) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: first clinical results with special regard to central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and aqueous flare levels. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(8):1151–1156
Pahlitzsch M, Torun N, Pahlitzsch ML, Klamann MKJ, Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E et al (2016) Correlation between anterior chamber characteristics and laser flare photometry immediately after femtosecond laser treatment before phacoemulsification. Eye Lond Engl 30(8):1110–1117
Chen X, Xiao W, Ye S, Chen W, Liu Y (2015) Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 13(5):13123
Lundström M, Dickman M, Henry Y, Manning S, Rosen P, Tassignon M-J et al (2017) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeries reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery: baseline characteristics, surgical procedure, and outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(12):1549–1556
Tanev I, Tanev V, Kanellopoulos AJ (2016) Nanosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: endothelial cell study. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:725–730
No financial interest or support.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kelkar, J., Kelkar, A., Pandit, A. et al. A prospective comparative study on endothelial cell loss and morphology after femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery and phacoemulsification. Int Ophthalmol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01297-5
- Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS)
- Endothelial cell count (ECC)
- Hexagonal cells