Advertisement

Factors influencing the reduction in corneal endothelial cells after Ex-Press® surgery

  • Naoki TojoEmail author
  • Ayaka Numata
  • Atsushi Hayashi
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the factors that influence the reduction in corneal endothelial cells after Ex-Press® surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. We included patients who had undergone Ex-Press surgery and were followed up for > 2. We analyzed the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) before and after Ex-Press surgery. We investigated the insertion position (Ex-Press device was inserted into cornea or trabecular meshwork (TM)), Ex-Press–iris touch, cornea–iris touch, peripheral anterior synechiae, history of trabeculotomy, history of selective laser trabeculoplasty, type of glaucoma, and simultaneous cataract surgery as influencing factors. We used multivariate analysis to determine the factors influencing the reduction rate of ECD.

Results

We included 129 eyes. The mean of ECD had decreased 7.0% at 2 years. Ex-Press surgeries significantly decreased the ECD after 2 years (p = 0.0118). As a result of the multivariate analysis, the factor that led to a significantly faster reduction in ECD was the insertion position of the Ex-Press (p < 0.0001). The reduction rate of ECD after 2 years in cases of insertion into the cornea (27 eyes) was 15.1 ± 3.6%, and in cases of insertion into a TM (102 eyes), it was 5.2 ± 1.4%.

Conclusions

Insertion into the cornea was a risk factor for rapid ECD loss. The Ex-Press should be inserted into a TM for long-term protection of the corneal endothelial cells.

Keywords

Ex-Press Glaucoma Corneal endothelial cells Factors 

Notes

Funding

No funding was received.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animals rights

All procedures performed were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, and ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Toyama.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez JM, Trope GE, Drori-Wagschal L, Jinapriya D, Buys YM (2016) Comparison of trabeculectomy versus Ex-PRESS: 3-year follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol 100:1269–1273.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307161 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen G, Li W, Jiang F, Mao S, Tong Y (2014) Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. PLOS One 9:e86045.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086045 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Netland PA, Sarkisian SR Jr, Moster MR, Ahmed II, Condon G, Salim S, Sherwood MB, Siegfried CJ (2014) Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT study). Am J Ophthalmol 157(433–440):e433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arimura S, Takihara Y, Miyake S, Iwasaki K, Gozawa M, Matsumura T, Tomomatsu T, Takamura Y, Inatani M (2016) Randomized clinical trial for early postoperative complications of Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy: complications postoperatively of Ex-PRESS versus trabeculectomy study (CPETS). Sci Rep 6:26080.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26080 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishima S (1982) Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology 89:525–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34755-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arimura S, Miyake S, Iwasaki K, Gozawa M, Matsumura T, Takamura Y, Inatani M (2018) Randomised clinical trial for postoperative complications after Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy with 2-Year follow-up. Sci Rep 8:16168.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34627-w CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Higashide T, Nishino T, Sakaguchi K, Yamada Y, Sugiyama K (2019) Determinants of corneal endothelial cell loss after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. J Glaucoma 28:61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishida K, Moroto N, Murata K, Yamamoto T (2017) Effect of glaucoma implant surgery on intraocular pressure reduction, flare count, anterior chamber depth, and corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61:334–346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0512-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omatsu S, Hirooka K, Nitta E, Ukegawa K (2018) Changes in corneal endothelial cells after trabeculectomy and EX-PRESS shunt: 2-year follow-up. BMC Ophthalmol 18:243.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0913-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tojo N, Hayashi A, Otsuka M (2018) Factors influencing the filtration-bleb volume after Ex-PRESS((R)) surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 12:1675–1683.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S172400 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Varadaraj V, Sengupta S, Palaniswamy K, Srinivasan K, Kader MA, Raman G, Reddy S, Ramulu PY, Venkatesh R (2017) Evaluation of angle closure as a risk factor for reduced corneal endothelial cell density. J Glaucoma 26:566–570.  https://doi.org/10.1097/Ijg.0000000000000669 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rowsey JJ, Gaylor JR (1980) Intraocular lens disasters: peripheral anterior synechia. Ophthalmology 87:646–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35189-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasegawa Y, Nejima R, Mori Y, Sakisaka T, Minami K, Miyata K, Oshika T (2016) Risk factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Clin Ophthalmol 10:1685–1689.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S106661 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourne RR, Minassian DC, Dart JK, Rosen P, Kaushal S, Wingate N (2004) Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 111:679–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.07.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soro-Martinez MI, Villegas-Perez MP, Sobrado-Calvo P, Ruiz-Gomez JM, de Imperial Miralles, Mora-Figueroa J (2010) Corneal endothelial cell loss after trabeculectomy or after phacoemulsification, IOL implantation and trabeculectomy in 1 or 2 steps. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:249–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1185-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gagnon MM, Boisjoly HM, Brunette I, Charest M, Amyot M (1997) Corneal endothelial cell density in glaucoma. Cornea 16:314–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith DL, Skuta GL, Lindenmuth KA, Musch DC, Bergstrom TJ (1991) The effect of glaucoma filtering surgery on corneal endothelial cell density. Ophthalmic Surg 22:251–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayaki M, Noda Y, Yaguchi S, Koide R, Iwasawa A, Inoue T, Inoue Y (2009) Cytotoxicity of antiglaucoma ophthalmic solutions for human corneal endothelial cells. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi 113:576–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto Y, Uno T, Shisida K, Xue LQ, Shiraishi A, Zheng X, Ohashi Y (2006) Demonstration of aqueous streaming through a laser iridotomy window against the corneal endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol Chic 124:387–393.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.3.387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sihota R, Sharma T, Agarwal HC (1998) Intraoperative mitomycin C and the corneal endothelium. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:80–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Storr-Paulsen T, Norregaard JC, Ahmed S, Storr-Paulsen A (2008) Corneal endothelial cell loss after mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 17:654–657.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181659e56 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macdonald JM, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF (1987) Effect of inflammation on the corneal endothelial pump and barrier. Curr Eye Res 6:1125–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sagoo P, Chan GL, Larkin DFR, George AJT (2004) Inflammatory cytokines induce apoptosis of corneal endothelium through nitric oxide. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3964–3973.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-0439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tojo N, Hayashi A, Miyakoshi A (2015) Corneal decompensation following filtering surgery with the Ex-PRESS® mini glaucoma shunt device. Clin Ophthalmol 9:499–502.  https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S81050 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamanaka T, Kasahara K, Takemura T (2011) Histopathology of the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:8849–8861.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu KY, Wang HZ, Hong SJ (2008) Mechanism of mitomycin-induced apoptosis in cultured corneal endothelial cells. Mol Vis 14:1705–1712PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zarei R, Zarei M, Fakhraie G, Eslami Y, Moghimi S, Mohammadi M, Abdollahi A (2015) Effect of mitomycin-C augmented trabeculectomy on corneal endothelial cells. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 10:257–262.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.170345 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leahy KE, Madigan MC, Sarris M, Watson SL, McCluskey P, White AJR (2018) Investigation of corneal endothelial changes post selective laser trabeculoplasty. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46:730–737.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13172 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kasahara M, Shoji N, Matsumura K (2019) The influence of trabectome surgery on corneal endothelial cells. J Glaucoma 28:150–153.  https://doi.org/10.1097/Ijg.0000000000001128 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations