Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 12, pp 2843–2849 | Cite as

Ocular manifestations in patients with cerebrovascular accidents in India: a cross-sectional observational study

  • Suchit DadiaEmail author
  • Chhaya Shinde
  • Roshani Desai
  • Archana Gupta Mahajan
  • Sourabh Sharma
  • Bhupesh Singh
  • Sudhank Bharti
Original Paper
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To assess ophthalmic manifestations in patients with stroke and emphasize the importance of a formal screening for visual problems in stroke patients in hospital and rehabilitation settings.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 50 newly diagnosed patients with stroke with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) > 8 examined within 3 days of onset. A detailed ophthalmic examination was performed for each patient including visual acuity, fields, ocular motility, slit lamp and fundus examination, line bisection tests and cranial nerve assessment. Radiological investigations were reviewed and anatomically correlated.

Results

A total of 50 patients (41 male and nine female) were included in the study. Mean age of the stroke cohort was 51.36 years. Twenty-nine patients (58%) had a subcortical stroke, while 42% (n = 21) patients had a cortical stroke. Nineteen patients (38%) demonstrated visual field defects. Twenty-one patients (42%) had a gaze palsy. Vertical gaze palsy (n = 8) was more common in cortical stroke, while internuclear ophthalmoplegia (n = 2), horizontal gaze palsies (n = 4) and Parinaud’s syndrome (n = 1) were seen more commonly in those with subcortical stroke. Twenty-four percent (n = 12) patients had nystagmus. Twelve percent (n = 6) patients had diplopia. Thirty-eight percent (n = 19) patients had convergence insufficiency. Sixteen patients (32%) complained of visual impairment. Retinal abnormalities were seen in 58% (n = 29) of patients.

Conclusions

Ophthalmic manifestations were seen in 90% of stroke survivors. Their presence in majority of the patients in our cohort suggests that earliest routine ophthalmic examination should be mandatory in all patients with acute stroke.

Keywords

Stroke Hemianopia Visual neglect Screening Rehabilitation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M (2015) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update. Circulation 131(4):e29–e322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dalal PM, Bhattacharjee M (2007) Stroke epidemic in India: hypertension-stroke control programme is urgently needed. J Assoc Physicians India 55:689–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacIntosh C (2003) Stroke re-visited: visual problems following stroke and their effect on rehabilitation. Br Orthopt J 60:10–14Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stone SP, Halligan PW, Greenwood RJ (1993) The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age Aging 22:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rowe FJ, Wright D, Brand D, Jackson C, Harrison S (2013) Profile of gaze dysfunction following cerebrovascular accident. ISRN Ophthalmol.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/264604 PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallagher M, Yip B, Virdi M, Martin BJ (2004) Retinal screening in patients attending a fast track TIA clinic. Age Aging 33(Suppl. 2):ii44Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shresthaa GS, Upadhyayaa S, Sharmaa AK, Gajurel BP (2012) Ocular–visual defect and visual neglect in stroke patients—a report from Kathmandu, Nepal. J Optom 5:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Ravensberg CD, Tydesley DA, Rozendal RH, Whiting HT (1984) Visual perception in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 65:304–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta R (2004) Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens 18:73–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhagyalaxmi A, Atul T, Shikha J (2013) Prevalence of risk factors of non-communicable diseases in a District of Gujarat, India. J Health Popul Nutr 31:78–85PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sridharan SE et al (2009) Incidence, types, risk factors, and outcome of stroke in a developing country the Trivandrum stroke registry. Stroke 40:1212–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allen CM, Marshell MJG, Wade DT (1988) The management of acute stroke. Castle House Publications, Kent, pp 172–176Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, Cumming RG, Currie J (2002) Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke 33:2417–2420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falke P, Abela BM, Krakau CE et al (1991) High frequency of asymptomatic visual field defects in subjects with transient ischemic attacks or minor strokes. J Intern Med 229:521–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cassidy TP, Bruce DW, Lewis S, Gray CS (1999) The association of visual field deficits and visuo-spatial neglect in acute right-hemisphere stroke patients. Age Ageing 28(3):257–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Townend BS, Sturm JW, Petsoglou C, O’Leary B, Whyte S, Crimmins D (2007) Perimetric homonymous visual field loss post-stroke. J Clin Neurosci 14(8):754–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rowe FJ, Wright D, Brand D, Jackson C, Harrison S (2013) A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: prevalence, type, rehabilitation, and outcome. Biomed Res Int 2013:719096PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nijboer TCW, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G (2013) Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study. Cortex 30:1–7Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sunderland A, Wade DT, Hewer RL (1987) The natural history of visual neglect after stroke. Indications from two methods of assessment. Int Disabil Stud 9:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Geminiani G, Berti A, Cappa SF (1991) Visual and non-visual neglect after unilateral brain lesions: modulation by visual input. Int J Neurosci 61:229–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1997) Hemineglect in acute stroke. Incidence and prognostic implications. The Copenhagen stroke study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 76:122–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weintraub S, Daffner KR, Ahern GL, Price BH, Mesulam MM (1996) Rightsided hemispatial neglect and bilateral cerebral lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60:342–344PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vallar G, Perani D (1986) The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia 24:609–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Barker PB, Beauchamp NJ, Gailloud P (2002) Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain 125:1094–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Newhart M, Heidler J, Barker PB, Herskovits EH, Degaonkar M (2005) Anatomy of spatial attention: insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. J Neurosci 25:3161–3167PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karatas M (2009) Internuclear and supranuclear disorders of eye movements: clinical features and causes. Eur J Neurol 16(12):1265–1277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pickett L, Rowe FJ (2010) Enhancement of quality of life in progressive supranuclear palsy: a review of clinical practice elements. Brit Ir Orthopt J 7:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cowey A, Heywood CA (1997) Cerebral achromatopsia: colour blindness despite wavelength processing. Trends Cogn Sci 1(4):133–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beauchamp MS, Haxby JV, Jennings JE, DeYoe EA (1999) An fMRI version of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test reveals multiple color selective areas in human ventral occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 9(3):257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baker ML, Hand PJ, Wang JJ, Wong TY (2008) Retinal signs and stroke: revisiting the link between the eye and brain. Stroke 39:1371–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Joint National Committee of Prevention Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (1997) 6th report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 45:360–372Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Michelle L, Wang J, Gerald L, Hand J (2010) Multicentre stroke study group. Stroke 41:2143–2150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and HospitalMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Bharti Eye Foundation and HospitalsNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Roshani-I CareMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations