Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 12, pp 2749–2755 | Cite as

Reduced vascular perfusion density in idiopathic epiretinal membrane compared to macular pseudohole

  • Luisa Pierro
  • Lorenzo IulianoEmail author
  • Alessandro Marchese
  • Alessandro Arrigo
  • Alessandro Rabiolo
  • Francesco Bandello
Original Paper
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the retinal capillary perfusion density by means of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular pseudoholes (MPH).

Methods

This observational cross-sectional study examined consecutive patients affected by ERM and MPH presenting between June 2017 and December 2017, as well as the 30 eyes of 30 healthy subjects. All patients underwent swept-source OCT-A examination. For each patient, vessel perfusion density and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area were measured.

Results

Twenty-five eyes of 20 patients with ERM and 28 eyes of 24 patients with MPH were enrolled. Thirty eyes of 30 age-matched healthy controls were included. The perfusion density in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) of ERM (0.401 ± 0.012) turned out to be inferior that MPH (0.419 ± 0.018) and controls (0.415 ± 0.017) (p < 0.01), while no significant differences were evident among the three subgroups in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) (p = 0.1). The FAZ area in the SCP was smaller in the ERM group (0.168 ± 0.123 mm2), respectively, than MPH (0.295 ± 0.013 mm2) and controls (0.213 ± 0.107 mm2) (p < 0.01), otherwise no difference were noted in the DCP (p = 0.14).

Conclusions

OCT-A morphological features differ between idiopathic ERM and MPH, showing lower perfusion density in idiopathic ERM compared to MPH.

Keywords

Epiretinal membrane Macular pseudohole Optical coherence tomography angiography Perfusion density 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Luisa Pierro, Lorenzo Iuliano, Alessandro Marchese, Alessandro Arrigo, and Alessandro Rabiolo declare no conflict of interest. Francesco Bandello is a consultant for: Alcon (Fort Worth,Texas, USA), Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, Georgia, USA), Allergan Inc (Irvine, California, USA), Farmila-Thea (Clermont-Ferrand, France), Bayer Shering-Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Bausch And Lomb (Rochester, New York, USA), Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Hoffmann-La-Roche (Basel, Switzerland), Novagali Pharma (Évry, France), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sanofi-Aventis (Paris, France), Thrombogenics (Heverlee,Belgium), Zeiss (Dublin, USA).

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen AW, Gass JD (1976) Contraction of a perifoveal epiretinal membrane simulating a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 82:684–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S et al (2013) The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology 120:2611–2619.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sebag J (2004) Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:690–698.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0980-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang LK, Fine HF, Spaide RF et al (2008) Ultrastructural correlation of spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic findings in vitreomacular traction syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 146:121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pierro L, Iuliano L, Bandello F (2016) OCT angiography features of a case of bilateral full-thickness macular hole at different stages. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 47:388–389.  https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20160324-16 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pierro L, Rabiolo A, Iuliano L et al (2017) Vascular density of retinal capillary plexuses in different subtypes of macular hole. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 48:648–654.  https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20170802-07 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pierro L, Iuliano L, Gagliardi M et al (2019) Higher vascular density of the superficial retinal capillary plexus in degenerative lamellar macular holes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 50:e112–e117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Govetto A, Lalane RA, Sarraf D et al (2017) Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 175:99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Samara WA, Say EAT, Khoo CTL et al (2015) Correlation of foveal avascular zone size with foveal morphology in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 35:2188–2195.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chidambara L, Gadde SGK, Yadav NK et al (2016) Characteristics and quantification of vascular changes in macular telangiectasia type 2 on optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol 100:1482–1488.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307941 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nemiroff J, Kuehlewein L, Rahimy E et al (2016) Assessing deep retinal capillary ischemia in paracentral acute middle maculopathy by optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 162:121–132.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.10.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelis P, Alten F, Clemens CR et al (2017) Quantification of changes in foveal capillary architecture caused by idiopathic epiretinal membrane using OCT angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:1319–1324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3640-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R et al (2004) Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 138:732–739.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.088 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pierro L, Gagliardi M, Giatsidis S et al (2014) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography evaluation of vitreoretinal adhesions in idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:1041–1047.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2546-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    La Spina C, Carnevali A, Marchese A et al (2017) Reproducibility and reliability of optical coherence tomography angiography for foveal avascular zone evaluation and measurement in different settings. Retina 37:1636–1641.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001426 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabiolo A, Gelormini F, Marchese A et al (2018) Macular perfusion parameters in different angiocube sizes: does the size matter in quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:231–237.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22359 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marchese A, Miserocchi E, Modorati G et al (2017) Widefield OCT angiography of idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis. Ophthalmol Retina 1:567–569.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2017.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific InstituteVita-Salute UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations