Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 11, pp 2449–2457 | Cite as

Macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography values and correlations in healthy children

  • Andrea Passani
  • Angela Tindara Sframeli
  • Chiara Posarelli
  • Domenico Lisi
  • Gianluca Guidi
  • Giamberto Casini
  • Antonio Ferreras
  • Michele FigusEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate potential correlations between age, gender, spherical equivalent and optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal parameters among healthy children.

Methods

A macular spectral-domain OCT was performed in all patients using a Spectralis® OCT device, and the macular thickness and volume of each of the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) subfields were analysed.

Results

Ninety-four children were enrolled. Mean central macular thickness was 274.968 ± 18.28 µm, while mean central macular volume was 0.216 mm3. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between the factor age and central macular thickness (F(3,90) = 4.96, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.14) and central macular volume (F(3,90) = 4.98, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.14). Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between the factor gender and macular thickness/volume of several ETDRS subfields. A significant correlation between refractive error and macular thickness/volume was also noted.

Conclusions

This study shows significant correlations between macular thickness/volume and the factors age, gender and spherical equivalent. Paediatric spectral-domain optical coherence tomography ranges need further investigations since many significant correlations are still to be confirmed.

Keywords

Optical coherence tomography Paediatric ophthalmology Retinal imaging Healthy children OCT values 

Notes

Funding

The authors of this manuscript have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Availability of data and materials

All the data used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.
    Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP et al (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254:1178–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fercher AF, Hitzenberger CK, Drexler W, Kamp G, Sattmann H (1993) In-vivo optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 116:113–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP et al (1995) Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 102:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wojtkowski M, Leitgeb R, Kowalczyk A, Bajraszewski T, Fercher AF (2002) In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 7:457–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, Pierce MC, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE (2003) Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 28:2067–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choma MA, Sarunic MV, Yang CH, Izatt J (2003) Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 11:2183–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drexler W, Sattmann H, Hermann B et al (2003) Enhanced visualization of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 121:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salchow DJ, Oleynikov YS, Chiang MF et al (2006) Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal children measured with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 113:786–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Z, He X, Zhu J, Jiang K, Zheng W, Ke B (2011) Macular measurements using optical coherence tomography in healthy Chinese school age children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:6377–6383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leung MM, Huang RY, Lam AK (2010) Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal Hong Kong chinese children measured with optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 19:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Othman SF, Sharanjeet-Kaur, Manan FA, Zulkarnain AI, Mohamad Z, Ariffin AE (2012) Macular thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography in relation to degree of myopia, axial length and vitreous chamber depth in Malay subjects. Clin Exp Optom 95:484–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turk A, Ceylan OM, Arici C et al (2012) Evaluation of the nerve fiber layer and macula in the eyes of healthy children using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 153:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yanni SE, Wang J, Cheng CS et al (2013) Normative reference ranges for the retinal nerve fiber layer, macula, and retinal layer thicknesses in children. Am J Ophthalmol 155:354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pérez-García D, Ibañez-Alperte J, Remón L, Cristòbal JA, Sanchez-Cano A, Pinilla I (2016) Study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in children: normal values and influence of age, sex, and refractive status. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elía N, Pueyo V, Altemir I, Oros D, Pablo LE (2012) Normal reference ranges of optical coherence tomography parameters in childhood. Br J Ophthalmol 96:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barrio-Barrio J, Noval S, Galdós M et al (2013) Multicenter Spanish study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in normal children. Acta Ophthalmol 91:e56–e63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsai DC, Huang N, Hwu JJ, Jueng RN, Chou P (2012) Estimating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal schoolchildren with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 56:362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hwang YH, Kim YY (2012) Macular thickness and volume of myopic eyes measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Optom 95:492–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università di Pisa-Dipartimento di patologia chirurgica medica, molecolare e dell’area criticaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria PisanaPisaItaly
  3. 3.Miguel Servet University HospitalUniversitad de ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations