Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp 2089–2095 | Cite as

The impact of duration on the recurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: optimal cutoff value

  • Mehmet Murat UzelEmail author
  • Mehmet Citirik
  • Çağrı İlhan
  • Kemal Tekin
Original Paper
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of symptom duration on the recurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and to determine the threshold symptom duration for recurrence.

Patient and methods

In this non-comparative, observational case series, a retrospective evaluation was made of the records of patients with RRD at baseline and during the postoperative follow-up period, in respect of postoperative anatomic outcome, prognostic factors for recurrent retinal detachment and the cutoff value of symptom duration.

Results

Recurrent retinal detachment was detected in 33 (17.8%) of 185 patients following primary retinal detachment surgery. The surgery type in phakic patients and preoperative symptom duration had a significantly high odds ratio for evidence of surgical failure. According to the ROC analysis, the threshold preoperative symptom duration was 20.5 days.

Conclusion

Our results showed that early reattachment surgery is necessary to lower the risk of retinal redetachment. The threshold at which RRD recurrence significantly increases is 20.5 days.

Keywords

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Recurrent retinal detachment Prognostic factors Symptom duration ROC analysis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Feltgen N, Walter P (2014) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment—an ophthalmologic emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:12–21Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, Campbell H, Singh J (2010) The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol 94:678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van de Put MA, Hooymans JM, Los LI (2013) The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in The Netherlands. Ophthalmology 120:616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuhn F, Aylward B (2014) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a reappraisal of its pathophysiology and treatment. Ophthalmic Res 51:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sullivan PM, Luff AJ, Aylward GW (1997) Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: a prospective audit. Eye 11:869–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanderson Grizzard J, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, Taren D (1994) A multivariate analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kon CH, Asaria RH, Occleston NL, Khaw PT, Aylward GW (2000) Risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after primary vitrectomy: a prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 84:506e11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erakgun T, Egrilmez S (2009) Surgical outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy with silicone oil injection. Indian J Ophthalmol 57:105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ, Garretson BR, Kuczynski B, Williams GA (2002) The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula- off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 109:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ho SF, Fitt A, Frimpong-Ansah K, Benson MT (2006) The management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment not involving the fovea. Eye (Lond) 20:1049–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitry D, Awan MA, Borooah S, Syrogiannis A, Lim-Fat C, Campbell H, Wright AF, Fleck BW, Charteris DG, Yorston D, Singh J (2013) Long term visual acuity and the duration of macular detachment: findings from a prospective population-based study. Br J Ophthalmol 97:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tseng W, Cortez RT, Ramirez G, Stinnet S, Jaffe GJ (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment but no previous vitreoretinal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 137:1105–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diniz B, Fernandes RB, Ribeiro RM, Lue JC, Teixeira AG, Magalhaes O, Maia M, Humayun MS (2013) Analysis of a 23-gauge ultra-high-speed cutter with duty cycle control. Retina 33:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farah ME, Maia M, Rodrigues EB (2009) Dyes in ocular surgery: principles for use in chromovitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 148:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Regler R, Sachs HG, Hillenkamp J, Helbig H, Framme C (2009) Long-term evaluation of anatomic and functional results after complicated retinal detachment treated with pars plana vitrectomy and heavy silicone oil tamponade. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 226:707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozdek S, Yuksel N, Gurelik G (2011) Hasanreisoglu. High-density silicone oil as an intraocular tamponade in complex retinal detachments. Can J Ophthalmol 46:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quiram PA, Gonzales CR, Hu W, Gupta A, Yoshizumi MO, Kreiger AE, Schwartz SD (2006) Outcomes of vitrectomy with inferior retinectomy in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 113:2041–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeck C, Kellner U, Bechrakis NE, Kreusel KM, Helbig H, Krause L, Schüler A, Bornfeld N, Foerster MH (2006) Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goto T, Nakagomi T, Iijima H (2013) A comparison of the anatomic successes of primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with superior and inferior breaks. Acta Ophthalmol 91:552–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alexander P, Ang A, Poulson A, Snead MP (2008) Scleral buckling combined with vitrectomy for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with inferior retinal breaks. Eye 22:200–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martinez-Castillo V, Boixadera A, Verdugo A, Garcia-Arumi J (2005) Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic retinal detachment without facedown position. Ophthalmology 112:1222–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tabandeh H, Sullivan PM, Smahliuk P, Flynn HW Jr, Schiffman J (1999) Suprachoroidal hemorrhage during pars plana vitrectomy. Risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 106:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    James M, O’Doherty M, Beatty S (2008) Buckle-related complications following surgical repair of retinal dialysis. Eye 22:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wickham L, Ho-Yen GO, Bunce C, Wong D, Charteris DG (2011) Surgical failure following primary retinal detachment surgery by vitrectomy: risk factors and functional outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1234–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caiado RR, Magalhaes O Jr, Badaro E, Maia A, Novais EA, Stefanini FR, Navarro RM, Arevalo JF, Wu L, Moraes N, Farah ME, Maia M (2015) Effect of lens status in the surgical success of 23-gauge primary vitrectomy for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study (PACORES) group results. Retina 35:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Enders P, Shick T, Kemper C, Schaub F, Fauser S (2017) Effect of symptom duration until surgery on first year outcome in pseudophakic primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 237:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sethi CS, Lewis GP, Fisher SK (2005) Glial remodelling and neuronal plasticity in human retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:329e42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abrams GW, Azen SP, McCuen BW, Flynn HW Jr, Lai MY, Ryan SJ (1997) Vitrectomy with silicone oil or long-acting gas in eyes with severe proliferate vitreoretinopathy: results of additional and long-term follow- up. Silicone Study Report 11. Arch Ophthalmol 115:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hammer M, Margo CE, Grizzard WS (1997) Complex retinal detachment treated with silicone oil or sulfur hexafluoride gas: a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 28:926–931Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SB Afyonkarahisar State HospitalMerkez, AfyonkarahisarTurkey
  2. 2.Ankara Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research HospitalUniversity of Health ScienceAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Hatay State HospitalHatayTurkey
  4. 4.Van Erciş State HospitalVanTurkey

Personalised recommendations