Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- 86 Downloads
To compare postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy conducted as day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
One hundred eighty-five consecutive PDR patients (185 eyes) who underwent primary vitrectomy (27-G in 64 eyes, 25-G in 121 eyes) were analyzed.
The 27-G and 25-G groups did not differ significantly in preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score, age, or preoperative intraocular pressure. The proportions of simultaneous cataract surgery (27-G vs. 25-G: 59.4% vs. 62.4%) and air-filled eyes (76.6% vs. 85.1%) were not significantly different between two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in ETDRS score at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months (all, P < 0.0001). Mean gain in ETDRS score from baseline was apparently better in 27-G group than in 25-G group at 1, 3, and 6 months, but there were no significant differences (1 month: 20.3 vs. 13.1 letters, P = 0.0703; 3 months: 22.9 vs. 17.5 letters, P = 0.1561; 6 months: 24.3 vs. 19.3 letters, P = 0.3313). Operation time was apparently longer for 27-G vitrectomy, but there was no significant difference (54.0 vs. 51.1 min, P = 0.3676). The same was observed for postoperative intraocular pressure at postoperative day 1 (19.7 vs. 18.1 mmHg, P = 0.1353). Incidence of postoperative retinal detachment (1.6% vs. 0.8%) and reoperation due to vitreous hemorrhage (6.3% vs. 6.6%) was not different between two groups.
The 27G system is as safe and as useful as the 25G system when used for PDR and can be expected to achieve earlier recovery of postoperative visual acuity.
KeywordsDay surgery Operative time Proliferative diabetic retinopathy 25-gauge vitrectomy 27-gauge vitrectomy Visual acuity
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Nihon University School of Medicine.
Before surgery, informed consent was obtained from each patient following an explanation of the vitrectomy procedures and potential adverse effects of the procedure. For the retrospective study, formal consent is not required.
- 1.Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sato T et al (2010) A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 117(93–102):e2Google Scholar
- 11.Caporossi T, Finocchio L, Barca F et al (2017) Scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using a noncontact wide-agle viewing system with a cannula-based 27-G chandelier endoilluminator. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001891 (Epub ahead of print) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar