Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp 1919–1919 | Cite as

Response to the letter to the editor by Tsatsos et al. “To remove or not to remove (the AC-IOL)? This is the question. Letter regarding article Endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a retained angle-supported intraocular lens by Droutsas et al.”

  • Konstantinos DroutsasEmail author
  • Apostolos Lazaridis
  • George Kymionis
  • Klio Chatzistefanou
  • Dimitris Papaconstantinou
  • Walter Sekundo
  • Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
Letter to the Editor
  • 268 Downloads

Dear Editor,

We thank colleagues Tsatsos et al. [1, 2] for sharing their experience on this controversial topic. Indeed, on the one hand, performing keratoplasty while leaving a stable anterior chamber intraocular lens (acIOL) in situ may be considered as the least invasive choice. On the other hand, exchanging an acIOL for a retroiridal one prior to keratoplasty restores the anterior segment anatomy to a better degree and may offer a longer graft survival.

The combination of endothelial keratoplasty with IOL exchange and fixation of the secondary IOL by gluing through scleral flaps as proposed by Narang et al. [2, 3] is a promising new technique that has been performed on a small number of cases up to date. Thus, regardless of the fixation technique (i.e., sutured or glued), studies reporting long-term graft survival are needed to confirm the superiority of sclera-fixated IOLs versus acIOLs.

We also agree with the comment of Tsatsos et al. regarding graft thickness in eyes with acIOL undergoing DSAEK. Indeed, as mentioned in “Results” section, we used thin or ultrathin DSAEK grafts with a diameter below 100 μm [1].

Finally, also in our case series, a well-positioned acIOL and a deep anterior chamber were prerequisites for leaving an acIOL in situ as suggested by Esquenazi et al. [4].

References

  1. 1.
    Droutsas K, Lazaridis A, Kymionis G, Chatzistefanou K, Papaconstantinou D, Sekundo W, Koutsandrea C (2018) Endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a retained angle-supported intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0899-x. (Epub ahead of print)
  2. 2.
    Tsatsos M, Athanasiadis I, Ziakas N (2018) To remove or not to remove (the AC-IOL)? This is the question. Int Ophthalmol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1021-0 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Dua HS, Kumar DA, Jacob S, Agarwal A (2015) Glued intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens with pupilloplasty and pre-descemet endothelial keratoplasty: a triple procedure. Cornea 34(12):1627–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Esquenazi S, Esquenazi K (2010) Endothelial cell survival after descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty with retained anterior chamber intraocular lens. Cornea 29(12):1368–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantinos Droutsas
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Apostolos Lazaridis
    • 2
  • George Kymionis
    • 1
    • 3
  • Klio Chatzistefanou
    • 1
  • Dimitris Papaconstantinou
    • 1
  • Walter Sekundo
    • 2
  • Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of OphthalmologyNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyPhilipps UniversityMarburgGermany
  3. 3.Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, Faculty of Biology and MedicineUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations